Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


About MrFragz

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. MrFragz

    Allgemeines Feedback - Update 0.8.7

    Die Haida wird im Forschungsbaum des Commonwealth nicht mehr angezeigt; nur noch die Perth.
  2. MrFragz


    @Allied_Winter, der Yolo ist stark seit die Credit-Direktiven aktiv sind :-) Ganz oben steht das Rammen von gegnerischen BBs, gefolgt von Torp-Rush... :P
  3. MrFragz

    Wettbewerb: Starfall

    Coole Sache, 3 Supercontainer und ne große Menge an Signalen. Gerne wieder, WG!
  4. MrFragz

    König Albert

    Ab heute!
  5. Hi! Installed the new update as every friday ;-) Your efforts are outstanding! Many thanks! Unfortunately the credits calculation is now more confusing than before. I noticed the following issues: - there are camos with prices of 375.000 or 600.000. These are reward camos and often can't be bought ingame so its wrong to subtract these credits from the income as there are no credits spend. - finding another way to do the math manually i tried to subtract all costs and 22.500 credits for type 5 camo (using this 99%); then realized that "consumables price" is always empty. I'm always using premium consumables, at least repair. So dead end. - same for flags; shouldn't be incluced in the calculations of net income, because you can't buy them for credits The goal is to get values equal as shown in the after battle scoreboard. Perhaps the state before with the additional values added and corrected comsumables. Kind regards, Stefan
  6. Hi, camouflages are not incluced in the column "net income". Just did an analysis which ship get most credits and i have to manually subtract the camo cost on net income to get the right results as ingame shown. Kind regards Stefan
  7. Works like a charm! Have a nice weekend!
  8. Hi Maxim, thanks for the fix. Works fine for the replay mentioned above. But i got two additional replays with parsing errors. Perhaps you can have a look at these to fix the errors? Regards, Stefan 20180429_032541_PGSB107-Gneisenau_50_Gold_harbor.wowsreplay 20180428_221857_PZSD506-Anshan_50_Gold_harbor.wowsreplay
  9. Hi Maxim, many thanks for the update! Highly appreciated! I have two issues: 1) I'm using Steam version of wow. So the installation path is: C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\World of Warships The replays are stored in this folder (0.7.4): C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\World of Warships\bin\336247\replays So i always have to copy them to this folder for mxstat to find them: C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\World of Warships\replays Is this intentional? 2) By analyzing a replay i got the following error: "Traceback (most recent call last): File "mxstat.py", line 1671, in OnReplayRead File "wg\replay.py", line 107, in parse File "wg\replay.py", line 339, in processPacket File "wg\replay.py", line 547, in callEntityMethod File "wg\replay.py", line 558, in callMethod File "wg\replay.py", line 591, in receiveDamageStat _pickle.UnpicklingError: invalid load key, '\xff'." Other replays are doing fine; i added the affected replay. 20180428_020305_PZSD506-Anshan_20_NE_two_brothers.wowsreplay
  10. Hi, just tried this tool for the first time. Looks great with nice features! Mxstat found logfiles only since 2018-04-15. My game installation is older than that. What's the reason for this? Is there any option for logging i accidentally activated on 2018-04-15?