Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Miscommunication_dept

Players
  • Content Сount

    5,512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    24438
  • Clan

    [SHAD]

Everything posted by Miscommunication_dept

  1. Miscommunication_dept

    [PSA] From Reddit: 3 days Premium, Camo and 3 Containers Code

    Well yes, they want you to register, but without giving them relevant details, we certainly haven't registered!
  2. Miscommunication_dept

    [PSA] From Reddit: 3 days Premium, Camo and 3 Containers Code

    No ones registering, just putting random words in the boxes.
  3. Will farm steel
  4. Miscommunication_dept

    [PSA] From Reddit: 3 days Premium, Camo and 3 Containers Code

    I feel so naughty! It works.
  5. I haven’t played one brawl. I did enjoy the previous 1v1 though.
  6. Miscommunication_dept

    Is the spotter plane so BROKEN?!

    I'll use Wows ballistics to show you https://jcw780.github.io/wows_ballistics/ Here we have Yamato with no mods (Purple) vs Yamato with spotter, +20% firing range (Mauve) The first graph is vertical dispersion alone, the second is total dispersion area.
  7. Miscommunication_dept

    Is the spotter plane so BROKEN?!

    It’s just so small it’s not worth worrying about. There some perculiarities in vertical dispersion in some ships such as Petro and Napoli, they benefit to a far greater extent.
  8. Miscommunication_dept

    Is the spotter plane so BROKEN?!

    Yes. Just as range mod gives a slight reduction to vertical dispersion. It is simply the way vertical dispersion is scaled against horizontal dispersion. I’ll try and find the post that explains it better than I will. I reiterate, it’s a small reduction. Edit: here it is: https://amp.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/l1dpzt/reverse_engineered_dispersion_ellipse_including
  9. Miscommunication_dept

    Is the spotter plane so BROKEN?!

    It gives a tiny boost to vertical dispersion. Its not huge abs for most players The different camera angles makes them less accurate.
  10. Miscommunication_dept

    Napoli vs Marceau ( & Commanders)

    Yes but don't just take my opinion on it. It took me at least 30 battles to learn how to use those bombs.
  11. Miscommunication_dept

    ST 0.10.8, new ships (DB 186)

    The term "flat-topped ballistics" confused me as to what it means. I now see in the Q&A that WG used the same term to describe Zao's firing arcs.
  12. Miscommunication_dept

    Napoli vs Marceau ( & Commanders)

    I’ve got nearly 300 in the Immelmann and I do really well in it. I don’t do well with the tech tree carriers and early indications are that I will perform worse in the FDR. Once you learn to hit destroyers with the bombs your game impact skyrockets. Better CV players than I do not seem to like her though.
  13. Miscommunication_dept

    Napoli vs Marceau ( & Commanders)

    I've had nearly 80 battles in it. It's still a lot of fun but I would still recommend Marceau as it's even more fun and probably more competitive.
  14. Miscommunication_dept

    Full price Marceau or Lutjens?

    In WG speak, ‘too popular’ means ‘overpowered’
  15. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    Looks pretty good: Ragnar will be available for 27,000 Steel.
  16. Miscommunication_dept

    Pobeda Planes (or russian planes in general?)

    Well on the rework CVs we’re made so they would always get one strike off but good AA might prevent a second. They also made the attacking flight return to safe altitude much faster than recalled planes. Soviet CVs take full advantage of these two things.
  17. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    Aside from 32mm overmatch the Incomparable compares poorly with Thunderer.
  18. Miscommunication_dept

    PSA. Its official. The torpedo bug hasn't been fixed.

    They also fixed the druid submarine view when both guns are incapacitated. Not surprised that the haven't fixed the torps, I am disappointed though.
  19. Miscommunication_dept

    General CV related discussions.

    Looks like Hidden menace is being fixed this patch: Hidden Menace Bonus added: –50% to the height at which aircraft return to a carrier after an attack or upon pressing the F key. Squadrons will now soar up to a height where they are invulnerable to AA fire faster.
  20. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    Id take smoke/hydro over this radar.
  21. Miscommunication_dept

    ST 0.10.8, new ships (DB 186)

    Oh dear
  22. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    7.5km max concealment and radar. so when a radar is available the concealment is not a big problem. When it’s on cool down it’s a problem.
  23. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    The AP pen is more Druid than Elbing and it does not have improved ricochet angles.
  24. Miscommunication_dept

    Ragnar coming for steel!

    It does look a bit of a long range spammer. When radar is on cool down it’s clumsiness and concealment will be big downsides. It also doesn’t dispatch destroyers as well as I expected, Druid certainly does it faster.
  25. Miscommunication_dept

    The latest "balancing factor" for IJN ships featuring Flamu

    They are breaking the game faster than they can fix it!
×