Miscommunication_dept
Players-
Content Сount
5,512 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
24438 -
Clan
[SHAD]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Miscommunication_dept
-
Best ships for Coal in 2021
Miscommunication_dept replied to bardic2000's topic in General Discussion
It's surprising how much more durable Moskva feels now. Destroyer HE spam is no worry in the Moskva, the Stalingrad has become one of the best targets for small calibre HE spam now being in most cases stationary with 4 fire nodes and 60s fires. In the Stalingrad, you are forced play far more cautiously now. -
ST 0.10.9, Novorossiysk (DB 205)
Miscommunication_dept replied to YabbaCoe's topic in Development Blog
Yes but this soviet ship has supercruiser dispersion. If they gave it an equal sigma, it would be better than the GC. Truth is it should be a bit better but as GC is very strong, it can only be a little bit better. -
Agir is better, Azuma just does normal cruiser long range HE spam but with more health and worse agility. However, as @MacArthur92 stated, information on a new freeXP ship might come out today.
-
General CV related discussions.
Miscommunication_dept replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Looks like they will be like the Immelmann with people getting frustrating at a lack of plane kills. looking at a lot of Pobeda play, there is potential here and a unique play style. Im interested in the RU CVs but not yet excited. -
Best brawler in the game?
Miscommunication_dept replied to totally_potato's topic in General Discussion
Just at brawling? probably Pommern is a good choice. For an all round brawler I would far prefer the Ohio with its nice guns -
Best brawler in the game?
Miscommunication_dept replied to totally_potato's topic in General Discussion
I don't think hiding behind the biggest man in the room counts as brawling! -
Why does Bismarck not have anti sub planes?
Miscommunication_dept replied to DerpyMcDoom's topic in General Discussion
So you think half the ships in the game shouldn't play ranked? Please continue to make your important contributions..... -
He did it a while ago. Surprised it's still there as I expected WG to ask him to stop and deny API access if he didn't.
-
Why does Bismarck not have anti sub planes?
Miscommunication_dept replied to DerpyMcDoom's topic in General Discussion
In WGs infinite wisdom they only give ASW to long range battleships. Brawlers get nothing. Does that not seem logical to you? -
PSA: Last opportunity to reset all captains for free
Miscommunication_dept posted a topic in General Discussion
On Monday the button will cease to work. I personally will be resetting everything on Monday and I will bump this thread on Monday morning. Link is here: https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/resetting-skills-for-all-commanders/ -
Is there any expected upcoming coal ship(s)?
Miscommunication_dept replied to O3EE's topic in General Discussion
Yes, it doesn't look good enough for steel -
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
Miscommunication_dept replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
2.6million potential damage.... In a Druid! -
Important message for the community
Miscommunication_dept replied to Crysantos's topic in News & Announcements
I was mildly impressed by their apology, at least compared to previous apologies (if you can call them that). Thank you @LittleWhiteMouse for shattering those dreams The most exciting part for me is that it would take a year to fix their lootbox odds so they might be ready for our eyes to see. Looks like the bundles DID have weighted chances of landing the Missouri in either the first few or last few bundles to divide people into 'advertisers' who get it first and share on the forums how good the drop rate is, and 'spenders' who start it and will not stop until they get the ship. Add to that the shortlists that have been proven and I think confirmed and they clearly have a lot of work to do. One could say that reputable company would be able to release odds immediately as surely they would have been upfront and not hidden anything from their customers. Of course, WG instead decide that they don't want to give us 'too much' information as it might confuse us..... -
PSA: Last opportunity to reset all captains for free
Miscommunication_dept replied to Miscommunication_dept's topic in General Discussion
With the dead eye change they just allowed battleship to have a free reset, they might do the same for subs. -
PSA: Last opportunity to reset all captains for free
Miscommunication_dept replied to Miscommunication_dept's topic in General Discussion
Thanks, I adjusted the OP. -
Is there any expected upcoming coal ship(s)?
Miscommunication_dept replied to O3EE's topic in General Discussion
Yes Carnot dpm is far lower than Alaska or Azuma. Without reload booster, I’m not buying it. -
Is there any expected upcoming coal ship(s)?
Miscommunication_dept replied to O3EE's topic in General Discussion
Marco polo looks weak. Napoli is fun and unique, I don't think its that strong though. Immelmann is very good if you like carriers, also fairly unique. If you don't like carriers, don't buy it! -
Is there any expected upcoming coal ship(s)?
Miscommunication_dept replied to O3EE's topic in General Discussion
Carnot probably -
ST 0.10.9, Novorossiysk (DB 205)
Miscommunication_dept replied to YabbaCoe's topic in Development Blog
Just noticed that the sigma of 1.40 is the same as the Marlborough, could it have been accidentally put on this ship? @YabbaCoe -
ST 0.10.9, Novorossiysk (DB 205)
Miscommunication_dept replied to YabbaCoe's topic in Development Blog
Just noticed, this is supercruiser dispersion rather than normal battleship dispersion. That sigma is shockingly bad though. 16mm plating is odd as T6 battleships usually have 26mm. T4/5 battleships have 19mm so i expect this plating reference is a istake and actually the plating on the superstructure. -
Advice needed for a spending spree
Miscommunication_dept replied to Camperdown's topic in General Discussion
Groningen is a good freeXP ship especially at killing DDs with its hydro/smoke/dpm combo I don’t think any legendary I’d worth it when you still have ships to buy. Even the best ones are only small improvements. Cossack is a very solid T8dd I don’t have Plymouth or Ragnar but to me Ragnar looks very good. For coal, Neustra is very good. very low concealment with nice torps and a super heal. DPM is low but arcs are very good so you really want longer range gunfights . That said, it is expensive. Do you have Marceau? That’s one of the best tier ten DDs and far cheaper. Coal upgrades, I only bother with the speed boost one really. -
Why some T9 ships are better than the next T10 iteration?
Miscommunication_dept replied to BanzaiPiluso's topic in General Discussion
I could only possibly agree to Kitakaze vs Harugumo as it feels more mobile. -
ST 0.10.9, Novorossiysk (DB 205)
Miscommunication_dept replied to YabbaCoe's topic in Development Blog
Sigma 1.40….. -
Sounds like fun but this might be naming and shaming.
-
Original Missouri Earnings are Restored
Miscommunication_dept replied to _HomTanks_'s topic in General Discussion
They also know exactly how the previous Missouri credit enhancement worked. They still screwed it up many times They also know the exact odds of their loot boxes but claim it will take more than a year to ensure they are compliant.
