Miscommunication_dept
-
Content Сount
5,512 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
24438 -
Clan
[SHAD]
Everything posted by Miscommunication_dept
-
I’ve been think about this: Why not have a battleship with 8x 4 127mm guns? In this game I think it would be a very effective ship. I wonder if the Navies of the world regret always trying to make the biggest guns...
-
Massachusetts vs Bismarck/Tirpitz secondary damage numbers
Miscommunication_dept replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion
Incorrect. Even shatters give the usual fire chance. -
Massachusetts vs Bismarck/Tirpitz secondary damage numbers
Miscommunication_dept replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion
Interesting. Only the upper bow and stern will be affected by IFHE every other part will either be penned without IFHE (superstructure) or not penned even with IFHE. I do run my Bismarck and Tirpitz with IFHE but I specced my GK out of it once the Russian battleships arrived. When I was grinding the GK legendary with IFHE I would regularly get more damage from secondaries and fires then from main guns. At tgss a t time the new ships were french and they melted beautifully, as will anything but the Germans if they bow on to you! -
Massachusetts vs Bismarck/Tirpitz secondary damage numbers
Miscommunication_dept replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion
Was the Vlad bow on to you? -
Massachusetts vs Bismarck/Tirpitz secondary damage numbers
Miscommunication_dept replied to Ocsimano18's topic in General Discussion
IFHE won’t make a huge difference against the Vlad as it has very little 32mm plating. Try it again with something french or British. -
PSA: You can stock up the discounted upgrades (currently 50% OFF) on "rental" Tier X ships you got for the "Clan Wars"!
Miscommunication_dept replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Great PSA. Thank you. -
Sugestions for the best build for Bayern
Miscommunication_dept replied to Butterdoll's topic in General Discussion
Have you tried them since the dispersion buff? Their accuracy is fine now. I would go PT, AR, SI and CE for the first 10 points. Then you can choose whether you are going secondary or tank and choose either Fire prevention or AFT. secondary build is ok at tier 7 but very effective at T8. Most good players seem to go for a tank build at T9 and 10. -
ST, Patrol Fighters consumable, Loop and Bering Sea maps
Miscommunication_dept replied to Sehales's topic in Development Blog
Sounds good for protecting friendly DDs. -
Will Legendary De Moines be nerfed
Miscommunication_dept replied to Puffin_'s topic in General Discussion
I think Des Moines should get a range buff so it’s at least on par with the light cruiser Worcester. It seems odd that the Worcester has a longer range. The Des Moines could also use a small buff and this would make the most sense. -
Directive 2 - Luna Warriors
Miscommunication_dept replied to pzkpfwv1d's topic in General Discussion
These ships don’t look very good really. Shame they didn’t include the Irian as that IS a fun ship! -
just curious as I have 60,000 RP and am thinking about the Ohio. The consensus of what I have read in the NA forum is that it’s less accurate and it’s worse reload means the improvement over the Georgia is less than that of the Montana over the Iowa. So I’m just wondering where it looks better tier for tier?
-
Dispersion or rate of fire nothing else is worth it. If the secondary reload increase was 50% I'd say the same thing. If it were 100% things might get interesting
-
Yes Kronstadt has battleship dispersion. Alaska has battlecruiser dispersion like the Georgia but has 2.05 sigma. Can you imagine if the Georgia was as accurate as an Alaska as the OP seems to be suggesting...
-
Did you happen to look at the dispersion number? 193m at 20km with the 11% module. The Ohio is 245m at 21.6 km.
-
Hayate - WG responds to the community feedback
Miscommunication_dept replied to Vbeest's topic in General Discussion
Heal? Defensive AA? Smoke? Shell arcs? Grozovoi looks better for now. -
T9 Large cruiser Agir and comprasion against other T9 large cruisers
Miscommunication_dept replied to CaptainKreutzer's topic in General Discussion
I loaded up my kronstadt yesterday and the guns kept trolling me. I realised this when I was happy to get 6k on a broadside battleship! That should be 15k! Kronstadt: battleship dispersion Alaska: Battlecruiser dispersion Azuma/Yoshino: cruiser dispersion. mall with 2.05 sigma. Kronstadt belt does work well for baiting the shots and feels amazing after the Azuma of course. -
Will Legendary De Moines be nerfed
Miscommunication_dept replied to Puffin_'s topic in General Discussion
I would barely use that extra range as the shells get far too floaty. The legendary is fantastic when moving around mountains. So far it seems very strong but only in certain situations such as if you are stopping to fire over islands often. As the enemy ship moves you move to block line of sight, this mod is great for that. I do wish it allowed some open water play though. Does the range mod give you enough range to kite or do you still find the Des Moines to be too squishy? -
Will Legendary De Moines be nerfed
Miscommunication_dept replied to Puffin_'s topic in General Discussion
Just finished the grind and it’s fantastic though you’d be foolish to sit waiting for someone to fire before accelerating. It only works once and the Desmoines citadel is big! -
The Henri, still strong but without speed boost it feels like a GK. If Wargaming nerfed the Kremlin in the way it nerfed the frenchies it would have removed the soviet close range dispersion buff or reduced the sigma to 1.6 like the Vlad. Instead a nerf that is not huge even in a CV game and as most T10 games seem to be without CVs, it's no nerf at all. Apparently the Russian server thinks the Russian battleships are underpowered. Is this why the Kremlin nerf is so underwhelming?
-
Balance. The Venezia has better armour and more guns.
-
How to spend 1,000,000 fxp; Need some advice.
Miscommunication_dept replied to Migantium_Mashum's topic in General Discussion
It will be the first tier 10 premium to be sold for freeXP so you should keep saving. hoping they’ll buff either it’s concealment or manueverability. It doesn’t seem to gain much for what it loses in comparison to the Shima. -
How to spend 1,000,000 fxp; Need some advice.
Miscommunication_dept replied to Migantium_Mashum's topic in General Discussion
I’ve been thinking about the uniqueness of the experience. There is no tech tree ship like the Alaska. If you want a Dakka dakka ship the daring has very similar dpm to the Friesland as well as torps and a heal. The HE needs IFHE to pen superstructure but the AP has ridiculous ricochet angles And will be your primary ammo. For that reason my vote goes for Alaska. -
How to spend 1,000,000 fxp; Need some advice.
Miscommunication_dept replied to Migantium_Mashum's topic in General Discussion
Friesland is great but as others have mentioned, no battleship or cruiser is scared to charge you down in smoke. It’s a strong ship but having no torps is a big downside. Alaska is very strong and a real cruiser killer. It’s armour is also fairly effective against battleships. Both are quite unique experiences and very fun. -
Submarines are here! Montana edition.
Miscommunication_dept replied to Blixies's topic in General Discussion
It’s a big ship.... -
I’m not a big fan but this ship is highly resistant to HE. The GK has 50mm plating so a number of ships such as the Hindi can pen it. The Kremlin has 60mm stalinium and is immune to anything but battleship HE. The GK also has a much larger superstructure that doesn’t seem to saturate. I’m not a big fan of the Kremlin but it’s HE resistance is ridiculous.
