Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Miscommunication_dept

Players
  • Content Сount

    5,512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    24438
  • Clan

    [SHAD]

Everything posted by Miscommunication_dept

  1. Miscommunication_dept

    IFHE rework IJN gunboats

    It is a nerf but considering the size of the guns it feels a bit silly.
  2. Miscommunication_dept

    PT: IFHE, HE shells penetration, and balance changes

    I really appreciate how these buffs and nerds are small and incremental. I’m also pleased to see the Kremlin getting another small nerf. Scharnhorst getting secondaries that can actually own battleships is quite nice also. IJN guns are still hard to explain
  3. Miscommunication_dept

    Problem with japanese Premium BBs

    Ishizuki is a very strong ship but it is really a long range HE spammer. Ashitaka is strong since they improved its guns. Mutsu, Mikasa I agree with you. Kii is a worse Amagi, for some reason it’s much easier to citadel. Musashi is probably still the strongest tier 9 in the game.
  4. I thought it would be interesting to see what plans we have for light cruisers as the IFHE rework is incoming in 0.9.2. SO what are you going for? Fire/superstructure damage or hull penetration?
  5. Miscommunication_dept

    Problem with japanese Premium BBs

    They're all the same when it comes to fire resistance but Yamato is more resistant to HE damage.
  6. Miscommunication_dept

    Tier 8 and Up Italians; waste of time or worth it?

    Brindisi and Venezia are borderline OP. SAP is very effective when you get used to it. They are fast. Their armour is fairly trollish Their smoke is a get out of jail free card for mistakes or to cover a turn.
  7. Miscommunication_dept

    Thoughts on IFHE changes vs Hindenburg and Hernri IV?

    I never used IFHE on the Hindi as it pens 50mm already. I will demounting IFHE from my Henri.
  8. Miscommunication_dept

    Cunningham Tokens progression so far?

    582 but the captain doesn't interest me. Does anyone know where the Cheshire is? I thought we were expecting it to come last week.
  9. Miscommunication_dept

    Dreadnought achievement

    Well that's a different issue I would probably agree with, CV/DD balance is horrible at the moment. Being the only tier 8 ship in a tier 10 game is extremely rare if not impossible with the match making changes that came a little while ago.
  10. Miscommunication_dept

    Restoring Premium ships

    As others have said, one request for as many ships as you like.
  11. Miscommunication_dept

    IFHE/ plating changes coming up. What are you doing with your light cruisers?

    On the news page about this Wargaming did mention Rebalancing ships that need it. I fully expect an increase in fire chance for many light cruisers. It will be interesting what happens to the belfast with this. Could they ‘accidently’ nerf it?
  12. Miscommunication_dept

    IFHE/ plating changes coming up. What are you doing with your light cruisers?

    You’re probably right. I’ll be in the Des Moines, one of the few that actually received a buff. The gap between T7 and T8 cruisers will be even more painful soon. Finally the Belfast gets an indirect nerf!
  13. Miscommunication_dept

    Dreadnought achievement

    They have already done that, have you not noticed? Tier 8 is now a nice tier to play, tier 7 on the other hand.....
  14. Miscommunication_dept

    Why the insane resource ship price inflation?

    He's right. It's just a standard tier 10 economy with a premium camo.
  15. Miscommunication_dept

    The Goliath (RN T10 CA)

    Much higher drag then the Henri 19-20km is about 12s for the Henri and 14.5s for the Goliath.
  16. Which tier 8 cruisers would have faired better? To generate the same result of one citadel plus a few full pens they only need bow armour of 27mm or less and an above water citadel. That is every tier 8 cruiser with the possible exception of Hipper and Eugen that could bounce shells on it's lower belt. The only difference of course is that the Albermarle can heal it back fast if you weren't being focused by 4 ships. Regarding your no armour comment, even DDs regulary arm battleships shells that hit frontally. Of course with DD's the game records a penetration but applies the damage of an overpen.
  17. Miscommunication_dept

    How to Chapayev?

    Chapeyev is though. Kronstadt shouldn’t bother unless it has another cruiser or DD to capatilise.
  18. Miscommunication_dept

    Siegfried balance Discussion

    Balancing 6 guns of a cruiser is something Wargaming have to work out for the Cheshire as well as the Siegfried so hopefully they will balance them well. If IFHE changes go ahead there will be very little advantage to 380mm over 305mm though.
  19. Miscommunication_dept

    Want to buy a resource ship to make credits. Advice?

    I forgot all about the Nelson, it seems to earn very well but it doesn't uptier that well.
  20. Miscommunication_dept

    Want to buy a resource ship to make credits. Advice?

    I wouldn’t recommend tier 7 ships after the matchmaking change.
  21. I wold say Russian bias but the angle wasn't great so I'm unsurprised he could get your citadel after overmatching your bow. There was only 1 citadel after all.
  22. Miscommunication_dept

    How to Chapayev?

    Schors has better dpm and manoeuvrability. Better ship for tier in my opinion.
  23. Miscommunication_dept

    Smaland cost

    I was talking in general, look at the armoury and premium shop. DDs are almost always the cheapest ship at tier but I do take your point regarding freeXP ships though sample size is of course tiny.
  24. Miscommunication_dept

    Smaland cost

    DDs are usually cheaper than cruisers or battleships so I wouldn’t be surprised if this ship ended up being very close to 1 million freeXP. That being said, we all remember how PR looked like a great idea in public test but was released at a much higher cost and became a terrible idea. i suppose the lesson we learn is to not pay any attention to the public test server.
  25. Miscommunication_dept

    How to Chapayev?

    True
×