Miscommunication_dept

It's been nice knowing you @Humorpalanta. We'll see you after a spell in the reducation camps.

This mod is not too useful as you still have the same amount of cooldown time. If it reduced cooldown time by even 15% many battleship players would use it.

Hmm it's a shame it's banned as the name you chose is not offensive at all. I'm not usually a fan of identitarianism but in this case I really cannot see anyone being offended.

What would 11 and 12 involve? Surely more large ships and lots of missile carrying destroyers? It would be a very different game.

I hope not!

I unfortunately don't have any data before 24/3/20. I'm not sure why. Wows-numbers says i purchased all my ships on that date! I do have all coal ships but the Salem I have Des moines)and I'm looking forward to buying another one after Christmas. Vampire, Z-44 or Plymouth could be coal so I'm looking at how these ships develop. Vampire looks the most interesting so far.

I saw yesterday, a supertester (ST-EU clan) get detonated in his Iowa by torps. In the very next game I dev struck him with Paolo Emilio torps. I felt bad for the poor guy!

WGC doesn't give me the option of installing TST only EU, NA, CIS, SEA and Public test. Anybody else have this issue?

Play odd tiers. I'm not seeing many CVs in my Paolo Emilio. In my Marceau I see a few more. I'm happy with it that way around. Unfortunately the CV rework was really harsh on stealth destroyers. Wargaming was testing reduced detection ranges for destroyers in exchange for throwing all the AA destroyers under the bus - AA on/off being slow, CVs getting a warning before they enter the AA of a ship. You know, like destroyers getting the warning when they enter into a ships radar range......

Do we know how much pen this Sap will have? Should be enough to citadel smolensks I think!!! Two shots and dead! Im ready for this ship!

Gay Santa? I see a pope Santa so that’s relevant I suppose....

If I’m a battleship now I tend to go in only 5-6 km behind my destroyer as he heads to cap. We all know that feeling when you lose your destroyer and you are left perma spotted with no other choice but to turn and kite. Im quite happy to lose 20k health to keep my destroyer alive. If I take too much damage, it can still be healed. This game needs a way to make players focus on victory rather than damage numbers.

Paolo is a lot of fun buts it’s certainly possible to potato in her. It’s a lot of fun when you can get those torps off. It has lovely shell flight times so it can do a bit of long range fire spam. I actually have AFT on mine, though that may change. It’s rate of fire means this is more a backup plan if all the battleships start running away, rather than the best play style for this ship. What I like about the Paolo Emilio and the Siegfried is they are unique ships.

This thing will surely get nerfed, no soviet links at all.

Of course but that surely isn;t the point of this? For those of us who like to play PvP, putting hundreds of ships through coop can feel like a chore. Now we have the choice to play PvP and not worry if we get a losing streak. It's a good move WG.

It always surprises me when battleships don't fire at spotted destroyers. Don't they know that their AP give consistent damage whether the destroyer is damage saturated or not?

300? I must admit, I thought they would ask for close to 1000. That's one random game having pressed the W key a few times.

Look what you made me do! I only went and bought it. I set it up for guns initially thinking it's shell speed (almost french DD level) would make it a good long range gunboat when you aren't charging battleships. How do you build?

A good and unfortunate point. There were only a couple that were too strong and they weren't game changers at all. Now Wargaming are hoping players will buy legendary upgrades when they provide no benefit at all. The Kleber upgrade could have been ok but it would need a whole different captain to maximise that build. Who wants to have two 19pt captains for a single tier 10 destroyer? Who wants to pay 25 doubloons to change between the two playstyles. Wargaming never took into account the fact that if someone has grinded for something, they will want to use it, when they looked into usage stats. Hindi's stats were shocking in this case. Who fears fire in a cruiser with 30s fires, cruiser damage control and 5 heals(with SI)? Yet, so many use the unique upgrade.

Crazy Christmas dockyard event? Edit: Nevermind, Hizen will be the Christmas dockyard ship. Yay.....

Lol, I missed out a sentence but I did, at least, think it!

I really hope Wargaming don't buff my Ohio, Georgia and Massachusetts!!

A lot of discussion about the Paolo Emilio and Marceau. What do you all think about the Smaland? I have 4m freeXP but haven't pushed the button yet.

PSA: farming battleships at range does wonders for your damage numbers but does little for win rate. Taking out a destroyer at the start of the game does the opposite. This is why Khaba has great damage numbers.

The Marceau is actually an experience of that for myself. I previously wondered why anyone would choose this over the Kleber. I cited shell travel times and the reload booster of the Kleber. On recommendation of a few on this forum I bought the Marceau. The shell travel times are not quite the problem I thought they would be and the turret traverse and dpm makes far more difference than I expected. The bonus with the Marceau over the Kleber is concealment. I always try to cap first in the Marceau. I cannot do this in the Kleber. With the Kleber, your team loses a destroyer and gains a light cruiser.