Miscommunication_dept

Losers Cruisers Many Destroyers Secondary battleships Bigger losers Large cruisers Small gunned cruisers Winners Sniper battleships CVs

It’s base secondaries have increased to 7.95km but so has Agir’s. Agir has more secondaries so is now the better secondary ship. WG should have buffed the range accuracy to maintain Siegfried’s unique traits. They could have done this without changing their rework. It could have been baked into the ship or even on a special one off module like the one you can mount on Yubari. They made an interesting secondary ship into a boring sniper. Very disappointing!

Confirmation from developers that it is the value as seen in port. Therefore including modules and skills.

Apparently, Happa is stating that the standard concealment used for dead eye is without skills and modules. Yet in yesterday’s stream they said it was the standard concealment as you start battle.

Commanders are really best only if you have excess coal. They are expensive.

Can we get the 4 who voted ‘wonderful’ cancelled? @Jack

That test was before German secondary dispersion was increased by 22.5%. @LittleWhiteMouse suggested that now German battleship secondaries have 10% worse dispersion compared to before the rework. I didn’t work the numbers myself but LWM is a good source. 10% worse dispersion would mean something like 17% Lower hit rate. Just take 10% better main and secondary reload over the 35% dispersion increase. It’s the better brawler skill.

As someone who even likes to take my Slava in fairly close at the start to capitalise on ships showing broadside as they position, I disagree. The reason I moved close was to improve my chances of hitting the target. That reason is no longer true. What puzzles me is that WG nerfed the +7% AP damage skill for cruisers but left this, much bigger buff in.

New Henri build 20.3km concealment. Lovely. Also, reload with ships within that range is 9.3 with legendary.

My Henri currently stands at 18.3km concealment with the bionic camo... Ive been thinking about taking concealment expert away from it and my Moskva.

Slap on the wrist followed by: ‘ Don’t do it again’ WG had already stated they would change the crates next year. We’ll see.

Bought Lutjens, buffed him to 21 points for the GK. unlike my devious GK secondary build it has greasers gears (expert marksman as well as secondary range, aDrenaline rush,CE, FP, and top grade gunner. I think the trick with the new secondary build is to build tank with secondaries only as and extra addition. Manual secs is not worth it anymore.

Not terrible for torp boats. Bad for gunboats.

This skill is just too naughty. My Slava says yes but every cruiser I have:

So fire does not effect the skill, nor do unspotted ships. Article here: https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/commander-skills-update/

Dead Eye: reduces the dispersion of the battleship's main battery shells if there are no visible hostile ships within your ship's standard detectability range. Complement this skill with Concealment Expert and Concealment System Modification 1 to make it even more effective.

Fen yang? Should we care? Looks like a nerfed Akizuki to be honest.

No you are correct. German secondaries were buffed so, with all skills, the accuracy would be 50% better than it was under the first iteration of the commander skill rework. Secondaries will still be less accurate then in the old system. As mentioned above, 35% is just not enough for a 4 point skill when you can spend those 4 points on 10% improved reload for secondary and main guns when ships are within secondary range, I'm sure that would be more effective.

It's @MrConways magic button. Press it and your torps will automatically home in on the nearest friendly ship.

Vanguard is the choice of connoisseurs. Simple people cannot play her well! ;)

Finally! (100hp from a Kraken) Now bed time!

Painful evening in ranked. Fortunately I was top scorer for all but one so didn't lose too much.

Very very different ships. Z-35 is a gun ship while z-44 is a torp boat. Neither is worth it.

Someone at Wargaming:

Source please?