Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

BLUB__BLUB

Players
  • Content Сount

    8,818
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    17199
  • Clan

    [BBMM]

Everything posted by BLUB__BLUB

  1. BLUB__BLUB

    Comparison RTS vs reworked CVs

    Yep. And sort of tactical. In the T4 CV you can just circle a DD with torpedo planes, and CHASE him away. Also, since you have slow planes and not that many of them you need to think what you do to be most effective.
  2. BLUB__BLUB

    Comparison RTS vs reworked CVs

    He doesn't mate. He has >70% unicum stats in all classes.
  3. BLUB__BLUB

    Comparison RTS vs reworked CVs

    Q: did you test RTS-CV against RTS-AA? No doubt you are right though. Reeeeework CV gets respawning. It's as simple as that.
  4. BLUB__BLUB

    Comparison RTS vs reworked CVs

    I like them anyway - because if you know how to use them @El2aZeR is correct. T4 CV is a good LOL. OK probably Langley... you can kill any DD that wants a try though. Easily. T6 CV is harder, but more powerful when you know what you are doing. T8 is where the division is between good/bad. I'm sort of "at the limit". If you are REALLY good, you are OP. If you aren't good enough, you'll lose credits unless you get a premium, in that case you can just murder on. Also, some CVs are stronger than others - waayyyyyyy stronger. T10.... dunno yet. But I'll find out. Which is a had task. Because CVs are not really about ships. But more people WENT CV. Just a lot of them also left CV... when WG nerfed them back to where they should be. Because the fact is that when you suck, you'll bleed money starting T6, and T8 is even worse for credits. Also... it isn't really a ship that you are controlling eh. Just you are SHOOTING ships. They didn't say that - basically they said "well we have sort of ff-ed CV up... cleaned up CV-rework enough, let's start a new one". I can give you another one: WG is putting out loads of HE-spamming cruisers, Russian BBs and such.
  5. BLUB__BLUB

    Submarines: the next step.

    TBH I think WG should introduce something else besides "here's 1-2-3-4 caps fight to t death" mode. Subs and CVs can work... but will never be fun, like this. How hard can it be, they already have most running PvE in Operations.
  6. BLUB__BLUB

    Submarines: the next step.

    Also... guess where the planes that sank Arizona came from. He might be thinking Hirohito spawned them out of his behind. Errr...
  7. Ha, so Brigadier Rosen = Cpt Barney.
  8. Can I kick myself for not seeing you there? I sent the red Baguetteboat back to port there. Uhhhh... this you?
  9. BLUB__BLUB

    Jingles commander

    I might do that in a few more years, if the game lives that long. I think either CV-reeeework or subs will torpedo it. Might be wrong...
  10. BLUB__BLUB

    Say No to Subs

    I can see them work, but I can also see WG making another crapfest out of it. I play the reworked CVs too, but some stuff is just --->
  11. BLUB__BLUB

    Submarines: the next step.

    Agreed. I think that is a very accurate assessment of what is going to happen. I'm not against subs though. I can actually see how they can fit them in and make them work. But the same as CVs, they'll not listen and make something crappy OP or just mega-crap out of it. So far, they have. True they have "corrected"it - but not by actually solving the problem, just using stop-gap methods.
  12. BLUB__BLUB

    Jingles commander

    Meh... I don't want Indomitable, really. If any higher than T6 I'd get Enterprise. I do not see the use anyway of having multiple CVs in the same nation. Better have different nations in that case, to help the grind.
  13. BLUB__BLUB

    Submarines: the next step.

    Well, I tried the test server for the CVs and what I got was: - playing CV, I got other CVs but just B0T-players in ships; - playing a ship, all I got was other B0Ts... ...so that's what porobably will happen unless everybody plays it. I see a "live server test" soon following... See above... ""By the end of the event, it became clear that our players are highly interested in submarines and we should be engaged in full development."" LOL 2018 Halloween event
  14. BLUB__BLUB

    Jingles commander

    Depending on the price. But likely I would, because that would be interesting, sort of. Same though as Warspite, I like the ship but not buying an old, powercrept premium for half a full "class A "" game. I expect the Ark Royal to sell for 20-25 €. If they try €75 including Jingles well guess again... nope! Same as selling 15pt Ovechkin (+30 days Premium) for €45... NOOOoooOoooOoo!
  15. BLUB__BLUB

    Jingles commander

    13 or 11 points might be troll. Or 7 points when he is a "coal captain".
  16. BLUB__BLUB

    Why this CV rework is FAIL

    I'll put word out to my divmate, however he thinks he should get a German DD or a cruiser or something else next.
  17. BLUB__BLUB

    What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?

    Pretty good. I sure can't do it (I haven't got Musashi... ) I'll raise you a couple of Furious games. For once not eve in a troll div, maybe that's why I lost one. Game 1: 3 kills 87k And then this I think Furious is the best CV. Almost killed the rest of them, but time ran out.
  18. BLUB__BLUB

    Why this CV rework is FAIL

    Sims does that regularly (depends on the CV being stupid enough to feed him planes) - but it might be good to prevent T9.
  19. BLUB__BLUB

    Aircraft Carrier Suggestion

    Well yeah you get those, I had a detonation on a cruiser. With a HE-bomb from Ranger... man he was quite salty. But I think it is a good thing CVs can't just delete ships at will. However, I'd also suggest the old "one strike". And then leave the gaps unfilled, like it was. It will be much easier to "balance".
  20. Just met @BrigadierRosen in an Epicentre battle. We won. The reds had one of those French cruisers, first he denied me the cit, but he stayed behind his island. So I moved around the island, flanked him and killed him anyway. Could not keep up with Brigs pace... well played mate, too bad I didn't see it sooner. Would have said Hi.
  21. BLUB__BLUB

    High tier naked ships

    Actually I meant I'm so bad at DDs it would REALLY be a waste...
  22. BLUB__BLUB

    Aircraft Carrier Suggestion

    Even the masterrrr cannot insta-kill a DD with rockets. OK he'll take three strikes then... and kill them anyway But that would be the T8 premium vs a T6 DD, and a stupid DD too. More likely the DD gets the rockets, and loses ~15%HP. I've had some that were impossible for me to hit hough. Then I usually leave them alone and go hunting for a less savvy one. Unless he tries to get my CV, then I'll go get the bombs... Which re actually a wate to use on a DD so I never do unless I have to. Yes, damage to a DD delivers more XP. But less credits. And since I have a tech-tree CV, I must make the battle worthwhile, too. Better start a fire for 15-20k on a BB. But a CV sure can (and will) kill a DD if he wants or has to do it. IMO it's not a CV job to go after DDs - best left to other DDs and cruisers, they have the tools for it. If DDs get nasty or whatever and the green DDs/CLs don't do their jobs... I'll do it though. I'll even manage to shove a torpedo up a DD. Annoy/ignore the CV at your own peril. And if a DD comes after the CV well not complain afterwards, unless very good or sneaky there's only one way it will end.
  23. BLUB__BLUB

    High tier naked ships

    I know... but the kind that goes BOOM in < 2 minutes is usually not "that kind". Probably they think camo is wasted that way, and well, it probably is. For example, I'll not put a camo on a French DD when I play it. (Unless it has a middle finger sticking out the smokestack).
  24. BLUB__BLUB

    The mind-set of the 40-percenter

    AP or HE it is mate, maybe some torps or bombs/rockets. Stones, well maybe in GOT or medievil but not here. But, did you consider what happened if all did "git gud". We'd have no cannonfodder. Lucky for you I'm still playing.
×