Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Yosha_AtaIante

Players
  • Content Сount

    8,032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    19168
  • Clan

    [HAKUY]

Everything posted by Yosha_AtaIante

  1. Yosha_AtaIante

    Citadels in the current state of game

    Or just play Shoukaku
  2. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    well... it will prevent potats from suicide rushing (not really they rush regardless) but overall make the game last longer I think. Tbh.. m. I wouldn't mind random games lasting a bit longer because full hp BBs are still at 1 / J line
  3. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    yeah it was quite toxic knowing that only way of dodging homing torps on top of that is by kiting meaning BBs rather go further away from the middle instead
  4. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    who are you again? It can't really be said yet, testing has just begun and we will have to wait for ranked.
  5. I agree with you in that it's weird that since they added depth charges as global change to all DDs and admitted mistakes on 2, why they can't add to okhotnik is weird unless they see that the models for those are missing and use that as explanation. All this of what I say of course is just speculation. So I will leave this discussion for now. I mean I don't really care to much if they change the model. I just wanted to point out that it really can be something someone on this world on the playerbase might have a problem with and therefore could fight WG for changing their purchase like that.
  6. Yes but a global change doesn't add something to a single individual ship right? also by saying "just disguise it as global change" you open the door for WG to openly nerf premium ships without hiding it with codename "global change" which they already did. But no need to normalize it further
  7. I'm not sure either, I don't play for that long yet. I know for a fact that they do visual improvements though to older models sometimes. So maybe they can sell adding depth charges as visual improvement. But yeah I think it is a bit complicated.
  8. Yosha_AtaIante

    General CV related discussions.

    they don't if by mistake you graze a flak? only the planes actually touching the flak which is usually as el2a explained 1 or 2 at most get damaged at best.
  9. I appreciate that. But yeah, just adding things isnt that easy. Now if they said they would add it without adding the visual depth charges then it should be possible though
  10. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    I hope they don't. Then there will be another chance for people to tell us how they will quit when they actually never quit. credit to Europizza though he really did quit :D
  11. I bought that ship and I will be angry if they change the okhotnik I love the way she is. I paid for her in exactly the state she is in now and altering her means it's not the same thing anymore.
  12. Yosha_AtaIante

    General CV related discussions.

    that's okay. But we should really talk about high potential of what CVs can do and could do. So realistically it should never matter that your Yoshino kekked on some pepega CV players squad. It would matter however if that same thing happend against me regularly for example. Then I would be able to come to an agreement with you. But since me striking a Yoshino in a similar situation is basically not possible because I know that I will be wasting time it's automatically like arguing on the effectiveness of AA in a bad scenario for the CV and the state of the CV players skill. That's why I said any ship besides Yoshino would have been effective in your example with flak. However no ship would be effective if the CV player was me or el2a
  13. I never talked about animations. However all DDs that have visual depth charges also have them Ingame. And it seems like that type of ASW is pretty much finalized is why these DDs have it with possibility of EU DDs getting mortars as ASW on top of that in the future.
  14. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    Of course I love it, peak entertainment. People should know me by now
  15. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    pretty obvious attempt at trying to say something akin to "By replying you are defending WG". Also your opinion on Coop being like Halloween is just that, an opinion. They are clearly different. One is always a fixed scenario.
  16. Not going to make that search now. But altering the appearance of a product like that that isn't improving the quality but adding potentially unwanted features is certainly product altering
  17. I'm not reaching. They are about to alter a product that they promised no alteration on. It's difficult to make that decision. Just because you feel that it needs something doesn't mean they have to make it happen.
  18. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    not defending blindly. Halloween event wasn't in coop or ranked. This right now is the first LIVE TEST of subs I actually Player populated mods that resemble actual wows game play instead if fantasy Halloween crap. But yeah I'm not defending WG just standing on the sideline pointing at people adding their own feces to the salt.
  19. Well yes the model can be changed. But that doesn't mean it needs to be and by changing the model they are altering the product others might like without the depth charges. So what now?
  20. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    Looks like its been done that way for at least 2 years now with CV rework and many other things they add slowly. It works quite well for WG
  21. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    first day of testing on live servers in love game modes, do I really need to add every little obvious bit of info? Just proves my point how tunnelvisioned the community on this forum is to seek drama
  22. Yosha_AtaIante

    General CV related discussions.

    topkek, I see what you did here
  23. I'm not arguing irl I'm arguing by Ingame model. By your logic we could add more torp launchers to more BBs too. BBs after all had at some point underwater launchers. As it seems the Ingame version of the ship doesn't have them and that might be that reason why it doesn't get any. also you arguing about "it carried mines why not depth charges?" is also arguing "Irl" just throwing that ball right back at you
  24. yes because the hull doesn't even have depth charges ready anywhere on the ship. As it seems okhotnik just isn't armed with any therefore it doesn't have any ingame
  25. Yosha_AtaIante

    Subs: I had low expectations but damn

    Well they will go to random at some point in the future no matter what. That this is a test and the first day of testing and people already loosing their crap is to be expected of certain individuals who proclaim all over the place how happy they would be to finally quit when subs arrive.
×