Andrewbassg

Oh.... nope. Look up what guided munition is and than come back..... Edit: actually...you know what? Don't.....

Lolz... At this point it is clear that you are just trolling... Buddy... you don't get to decide what's basic and what's not. That's not up to you. And there is no such thing as basic outfitting. Some people get into battle, with not fully researched ships, so stop talking nonsense. Like I said, you consider only the best case scenario, with 21 point caps and alike so thanks making my point. After all that ...jazz you finally got it. :) FYI I personally greatly prefer maneuverability over concealment. Only on Edin I use concealment, otherwise I use double rudder shift where applicable. And it serves me well. In order to have a meaningful discussion, a common language is mandatory. If you want to reinvent the ABC then please ship also a dictionary. If you point at a white rusty bus and you say" look a nice red cabrio" I will look at you and .... weil I will say "poor guy"........ Well ...you try to present your opinions as facts so...... maybe in your head perhaps they are..... Oh....please go ahead and remove it..... Of course you did. You said that ASW is a consumable, when actually it is a capacity and capability. ASW means Anti Submarine Warfare. If you remove that a ship has no capability to attack those pesky boats, which go, ya know, under And you say it again..... Buddy.....even the game lists it as a weapon. Go ahead and check it out. As a hint you have to go to settings..... Buddy.....lol....radar doesn't counter anything. It extends the spotting of a ship and by that temporary negates any concealment advantage which one ship could have over another. Please repeat this it until you get it. Just lolz.....you want to argue about ship class interaction, but you don't know what radar is..... But....if you say red cabrio and I see white rusty bus, we won't understand each other. I can guarantee that. So try to formulate in a way that is universally understandable. And...you don't seem to understand what radar is, what a consumable is and what a weapon is, so....and believe me I'm gentle...... Erm.......I didn't argued against that. From where you got that idea? Oh my... this whole discussion and the whole thread is about different (ship) class interaction. IDG AF about how subs are. I'm interested in how they interact with other classes.....just....lolz...... white rusty bus...or is a cabrio? A red one? How you could have understand something else is beyond me....but then again ....white rusty bus...

But is with guided ammunition. So no.....because the so called "information" is garbage

Btw.... ...for the inevitable lolzies...

Jesus........mate, you don't know how people fit out their ships and captains...You are talking about best case scenarios. Stop petting your belly and declaring things over which you don't have control whatsoever and declare them as.... facts. Facts are objective. Base detection is objective Fitting out a ship is subjective . Yes, you are talking nonsense. Not at all....it is hard to have a discussion when the meaning of the words are different to the parties. Downside is not weakness. German BB;s not having ASW is a downside. Some ships having poor maneuverability, when in order to hunt a sub the ship have to maneuver, is their weakness. Weakness is scalable, downside is not. Its a binary choice. A is A not a B. And no, facts are always objective and opinions are subjective. You are again wrong. Its not an advantage. Its a necessity dictated by the need of balancing the game And no, at best is a temporary relief, especially in the case of cruisers. Oh my....you are talking nonsense again. ASW is an attack mechanic, radar is a spotting mechanic .A is A not a B. Oh mate.....we are talking in the broader context of interaction between classes. And none of them are a counter. Still both are an interaction mechanic Just nope...that's pure nonsense. Extending the spotting doesn't do anything by it own. Negates their stealth advantage, but otherwise does exactly sh*t.It does not counter anything. Go figure I know. But you still forget to mention when all of that doesn't work I mean RPF and the other stuff. And just for example having not much vision is a downside. Not having much HP is a weakness. You got it now? Weaknessand strength is always gradual and comparative. Also what you are mentioning are all balancing issues. They got all of that still wrong. You still don't understand...we are talking about class interaction. Which is all frakkin wrong. Ermm.....which everybody gets regardless if they play with/against subs. So..... dafaq are u talking about?? A is A not B Btw please stop this "tabletop" "dev explaining" kind of talk. It Is just pure crap.

Nah....This is garbage. You are assuming that the ship is going away from the sub. How about when they push in? And actually the biggest chance to avoid is to go straight at, because the combined speed give less time for the torp to react.... Still without damacon this is just pure crap.

Of course I did. You are talking nonsense. What is the base detection of those two dd's? You never balance by best case scenario. The favorite argument of the pro Cv crowd is that you not balance by the best players yet here you are, shifting the narrative as it fits. Of course it is. It is your opinion. Its not a fact. And there are no...downsides, there are strengths and weaknesses. Lolz. That was exactly my point. But I can see now that you are having translation issues, no offence. No....oh my. Radar doesn't counter anything by its own. And yes you can compare AA with ASW because it is a form of direct interaction (attack/defense) between two different classes. No.....oh my.....Radar simply extends spotting. it doesn't counter absolutely nothing..... And actually that's the problem. There is no consumable comparable to radar, that extends spotting, against subs. Which is B.S How about some frakkin rewards then? If they are not capable of properly think them thru??

I don't mind if a good player do gitgud. Kudos and GG. That wasn't the point. He said something which was.... lolzie.

Oh bud......I've seen subs taking out 3-4 ships....just ....

You can doubt that all day long. Look, I didn't come here after my first battle. I play on two servers. And ranked is my favorite battle mode. That's just your opinion. I dodged quite enough torps from them and I'm still telling, you its crap. Erm.....how about no AA, then ? I'm sure that plenty airbus drivers would quite happy....... I can't believe that you are comparing consumables with ....ASW. Just ....lolz. Tbh I don't see a problem there. I mean subs having a deck gun. But....I doubt that many would use them. I know. But..... that is supposed to give me a warm feeling around my heart? With all the other jazz goin' on around?? That's a good joke.

:) I play mainly RN Cl's. I have no problem to get killed. Well.... except airbuses.

Yeah. Weegeeromance. I can't explain coz...... it will be multliple TOS ....violation(s)

No, not really. Radar can illuminate them, so they are taking a risk. Not so much subs. It doesn't matter if you cant fire back. And a sub can fire its torps and then ping you. So yes it is stealth firing.

Actually.....while the name is random number generator, it can be manipulated.

Also it seems that others are watching too...

Btw...

Yeah......I definitively know the feeling. Sad is that once someone realizes that Weegee's interests are fundamentally different ( if not outright contradictory) to those of the players..... .But they are actually idiots, because it shouldn't be the case. The community should include the devs and the company. Fundamentally the goal should be the same. To maintain the game and if possible widen the playerbase. Then we can have our fun and they can have their/our money. But no....coz "we" have a "hot" latin submarine lover.......

She responded to your questions :) Also, this response I think explains, why she choose to present the raw data vs definitive conclusions. There are simply too many variables (flags cammo's , yadda, yadda) and a too small sample pool to draw an "exact" conclusion.

Like I said above.

No she doesn't. It seems that it is forgotten that initially WG set the "special mission" earning at 17%. Only after she confronted them over this they changed it to 20%. Without, there would be a much bigger difference. And they would have not acted as quckly. In fact she resigned as a direct consequence to the disrespect shown during that ..."discussion."

Idk, I fired only: Tho not in anger......

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/243545-community-time-with-ev1n-and-mademoisail/

Erm...... Pretty much.

Well....it was about time. Still it means two more weeks with it.

Also somebody posted the answers from the stream in a written form. That was a LOT of work!!!