Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Andrewbassg

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25837
  • Clan

    [OZYR]

Everything posted by Andrewbassg

  1. So.....as per the title says ,now after playing bronze and some silver, I can say that subs, at least how Weegee implemented them, are total garbage. Who tf thought that implementing a class which can virtually outspot everyone in the whole frakkin game..... is a good idea? Who tf was dat brilliant genius who thought that introducing a class which can stealth fire, with no frakkin penalty is a good idea? With... homing..... torpedoes......Who tf was that brightly illuminated mind who thought that having ships, in ranked, which have no ASW is somehow..... a good idea? On top of all of that who was that brilliant genius who thought that all of that have to happen in ranked, with fixed tiers?? Tbh bronze wasn't that bad. I would say that even...balanced. But....silver? What is this ......?!?!
  2. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Btw to all the people who saying CC's this and CC's that: Some people don't feel comfy when they are associated with a company which does all sorts of shenanigans. Just like when WG didn't liked it when some CC's were talking..... all sort of...things. Its a two way street. And also there is the responsibility part. CC's being connected to the company have to talk about the various in game events. Now if those events are.....hmm....let's say "funny" then they have to chose between the company and honesty. Shure thing it can be a...'nice talking point" and some virtue signaling can happen. But some people actually feel responsibility toward their audience and can't in good conscience be a part taker. Otherwise "Weegee people" pay attention because That being said there is a nice educational video for you on how to treat the player base
  3. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Yeah, but watching them under a microscope and delivering the well deserved spanking is...
  4. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    And....
  5. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Just no. There is a pattern present which precludes that. If this would have been a singular event then let's say, "yes", but.....it isn't. There is a pattern here and an increasing one too. CC's left partially because of the excessive monetization. And actually..... words matter. A LOT. as Weegee themselves "found out" So.....
  6. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Just... nope. First of all she will be literally the last person on Earth to say 'we have to assume" because frankly it is belittling. It assumes some form of control and also disrespect to the other person(s) intellect and capabilities. i Yes you are. She observes facts and convey that in from of information. Nobody who share information does anything malicious. Actually withholding information could be considered malicious Then comes the question of motives and circumstances. A is A not a B..
  7. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    You are again factually wrong. She is saying that there is a possibility that they acted with premeditation. How strong that possibility is..... that is subject to personal interpretation. .But the possibility is factual.
  8. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Well... now I'm waiting for Crysantos to respond, before posting it on NA. He said that he needs to consult with the devs..... Btw its odd because on stationary ships... it seems there are no problems...at least in training room.... Edit: Actually it seems that there are no problems at all in training room......what a....
  9. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Thank you. I was about to post an addendum saying that I will post the response in them . I will now wait for your response before posting on NA.
  10. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Speaking of which it seems that there is a rework of the in game communication system ( pinging) and is not mentioned in the patch notes. Is this true?
  11. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Oh my...... and it was in the patch notes?
  12. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Mate.....WOWP isn't dead also, right? Oh wait...... And.....your metric and mine could be a lil different.
  13. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Lol. U mean da Satan crates?? Or the Dutch containers??
  14. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Oops... I was a bit missing and... this happens... 1. I don't know what language you spoke but a lie is a lie. LWM was polite. I'm not .Repeat after me. It was a lie. Everybody ,who was in that period in the game was lied to. Period. 3. Ermm... you don't know the facts. Like at all. Based on the preliminary data LWM ( correctly) predicted that 17% will not compensate the loss of the ship's special credit earning which. they repeatedly and publicly claimed. On 12th August she proceeds to confront them over this and get ....disrespected in various ways The WG staff member start to backs down only when several CC's jump in and and point out the correctness pf LWM's findings. 13th of August LWM resigns and several Cc's follow suit. And then after a week or so we get an insulting nonapology from WG and only then they start to to adress the credit earning by raising the mission to 20% Which still wasn't producing the same results under all circumstances as before,. So actually you can claim that only because LWM jumped ship. It would be nice if you document yourself a bit before you start talking from your rounder parts. I mean other than what's on your neck.. Otherwise i dont know what you are smoking, but it seems efficient.
  15. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Erm ......you mean the whole list of them? Otherwise ...the question is if WG plays evolution or involution. The odds seem to favor rather heavily the latter.
  16. Andrewbassg

    Do we have another bug?

    Now that we are speaking about I did noticed that too. I mean the secondaries. I don't play them regularly so....but when I did, I noticed that too . it seems that they are hellbent to destroy this game.
  17. Andrewbassg

    Subs are complete garbage in ranked. And not only.

    Quite an understatement :)
  18. https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/203 Coz...yeah.
  19. Andrewbassg

    Important message for the community

    Hello miss Mouse:). I'm glad to see you here. Bandi73 on NA :)
  20. Andrewbassg

    General CV related discussions.

    But they cannot pretend that they listen to feedback. When Sub oct responded to one of my questions, he said that a "LOT of people asked for subs". In the same vein they can pretend ( because pro Cv posts exist) that a LOT of people are ok with the current situation. Which is obviously false. Those are all facts. Meaning that those are not feelings. Objective, unquestionable truths. Look. I'm not interested in mental exercises or forum thingy's. Again every class is subject to certain conditions. Just Cv's are "exempt and excused" from them. As for your example, you want me to look up a T8 dd with the smallest HP and compare it to MVR? As per the consequences of fires on them? Really? Of course, if it fits their interest :). Which is not the necessarily the health of the game or balance.
  21. Andrewbassg

    General CV related discussions.

    It doesn't matter how moderate you are, because every pro post gives excuses to WG. to not change anything. And how about those who for various reasons actually want the class to be superior to every other class?? Well the Earth is revolving around the Sun, right? So, its a fact. In the same vein Cv 's cant burn or flood easily. Cv's can't detonate. Cv's can launch planes when under direct fire or on fire. All three of them. Cv's don't take module damage to their plane regeneration capacity. Let alone the destruction of that capacity. All of that in a PvP game, in which every other class is subject to all of that. Its just absurd and obscene. And the question of AA which can't even be attempted to properly balance ( i.e not favoring neither side) because of the MM. Cv 's should see only =/+1 tier ships. If you think that WG is not aware of all of that... well try again. All of that not taking into account the inherent differences resulting from the different playstyle. I e doing damage by planes, with all the tactical advantages which that confers. :Oh my....of course they won't. But you did, right? I'm just sayin...
  22. Andrewbassg

    General CV related discussions.

    Yes it is. Because WG can point to these posts, and play the pretending game, which they actually did for 2 years(!!) Cv's are a dishonest class, because they are dishonestly implemented. Period. This is as factual, as the Earth is wandering around the Sun. Because, like I said above, it gives Wg all the excuses they need to not take a good look at the class with impartial eyes, and dismiss any and all critical points as" muh the player base" and "muh Cv haters" even if they are well founded and based on facts. Make no mistake, I do "hate" Cv's but I don't hate planes. Still, I don't want them removed. I want them properly implemented.
  23. Andrewbassg

    And subs are becoming more stealthier....

    Of course. Tho weakened, the kokutai must be preserved.
  24. Andrewbassg

    And subs are becoming more stealthier....

    Welcome(d) to the Underverse!!
×