Andrewbassg

Yes I know. Look, l'm actually wanting "you" to succeed in restoring the good relation with the player base. I'm just not painting a rosy picture because, things are not. At all. Until now we didn't have a direct communication channel, so....... there is a LOT to put up with. I will quote a discussion from NA because it is pertinent to the bigger picture. There is a problem namely "you" are not players of this game. For "you" it is a job. In russian it is called "robota". Yeah..... So there is a very wide pov difference. The most "important" outtake from that conversation is that the company needs " boots on the ground" and I don't mean the...."loving kind" but those who can and willing to be impartial. I would argue that LWM and Flambass were ( perhaps are!!) ideal candidates. They are widely respected and for good reasons. "You" need the input of players who are actually playing the game and who are balanced enough, to provide you with a clear picture and "you" need that picture. Desperately. I'm actually trying to help, even if I'm not smiling at "you" and I'm not pretending that A is somehow a B.

Hmm ..... Changed the rewards under the "Naval Community" tab: Removed the bundle with III Katori. However, this ship is still available to purchase in the Armory for 2,550 Doubloons. With the release of Update 0.10.9, Premium Ship V and Premium Ship VII containers, as well as the Restless Fire commemorative flag,will no longer be available in exchange for Community Tokens. They'll be replaced by new rewards. The full details will be announced when the release of Update 0.10.9 is near. Getting back to biz as usual ? I mean......

or... AKA

To continue the educational series of videos.....

Directly from the Salt Mines. With some guests

Soo..... Ise's, Cv's subs possibly together .....definitively not my kind of fun. Add to that the very bright and genius teammates.... The recipe of the success right outa Weegee's playbook. Fun is not included......

........ Of course I "don't" have. its like a wife asking his husband "honey I want to go...f.a.q. around a bit, what "safeguards" you recommend"?? Just ...lolz...

Look, the problem isn't that a company wants to make money. From my part, the more they make, the merrier. But they are using excessive, predatory type monetization tactics, sacrificing the reputation of the company and their product on the altar of greed, destroying their relation with the player base, the community and the game itself. First of all, given the niche nature of this game it should be run as a hobby company, not as a game company. And the switch should have happened years ago. Meaning that maintaining the player's numbers should have been paramount. Healthy, friendly relations with the community. Stuff like that. But instead somebody made the decision "to go after the cheese" no matter what and now they are the "victims" of their own "success"

Like I said you really suck at this..... I mean, you know that they are like vending machines, right?

You mean... like this? https://www.paysafecard.com/en/ I never really understood this credit card fetishism ...... But they didn't said a word nor corrected nor attempted to intervene. Granted, they are not responsible for other people's actions. However they are responsible for the reputation of their company and their product. Ah da irony... And like I said before a singular event is passable. But we talk about a recognizable pattern, a repeated behavior. There is a reason why juvenile sex offenders are registered, because they are known to engage in repeated, pattern like, predatory activities, which are very dangerous. While the comparison seems really far fetched its actually not. Because of the "repeated, pattern like, predatory" behaviors. even if those behaviors are incomparably different. Like I said, repeated, pattern like, predatory" behaviors. Being an activist is not defined by "holding hands and singing Kumbalaya". However those are recognizable.

No offense buddy but you really suck at this. The age rating of this game is 7 ( I know but not yet). Which means that it literally has a sign on it which says children can play here. Yet as you said, "we have traffic" here. So who tf is to blame? The parent? Really??.....sigh Buddy.... you really don't know what you are talking about. i already told you that all you gonna accomplish is giving me talking points. PR was deceitfully advertised as a free to get ship for which the missions would be not to grindy. It was a scam. Before Kong, the long lasting policy was that if a ship played one battle no refund will be issued. I wonder why that had to be changed. It was again deceitful advertising. Missouri was intended as a scam. And actually it was a scam WG repeatedly said that they didn't wanted to clone the ship because people wanted THAT ship. Of course if people who'd have seen a different name would have been asking question. The only reason why didn't succeeded was because of the giant scandal and shitstorm. Removed*

You mean...PR, Satan Crates, Kong, Summer "Sale", Missouri ....? those were all examples of exemplary conduct of Weegee..... Look, I don't want to spoil your little Veronese balcony scene, but....you are not Romeo and WG is certainly not Juliet....just sayin.... Lol... that's what you are arguing for in this whole thread....top to bottom .....so ... Also, what is the rating of this game? And you were saying...... what again?? No bud. I know what activism is. He is not.

This is just ,,,, buddy you are so far off that you can't even imagine .......Illegal is not the same as dishonest.... ...kids don't know what's legal.......that's why they are ...kids.....And who tf cares if the child is dead?........ Jesus..... he is not an activist. He is a simple human, sharing with us his life experience. Ya know... that's what ......normal humans do....they share their experiences with each other. That's why this forum exists.......

Oh boy.....how quickly I was proven wrong...... Ah da irony....... First you accuse LWM of all sorts of things, then you talk about individual responsibility which she assumed when she jumped ship...... its just amazing how many times you are capable of contradicting yourself in one single thread .... and actually in one single post...... But please by all means continue. At this point whatever you say its only gonna be funny......

Ahhhh......no "smartass" comment could ever rose to the level of that moment........

Why not? He seems exceedingly happy...... I mean gustus not disputandum.......

But.... its ok to put up razor wire.......around a bloody play park. Coz........ play parks are not actually meant for children...... I wonder if it could get any better than this.....

Lolz.....yeah they actually got to hold something in their hands vs......

I will leave this here, pertinent to the.... transparency Also third party sites were referenced in the latest ( developer)Q&A, yet.....

I noticed that it seems harder to ping friendlies and enemies alike. It seems that the aiming has to be close to the center of the ship whereupon before that wasn't an issue. Given that we had all sort of experiments and reworks related to that the, coincidence seems unlikely Anyone else noticed this too?

Erm....we are getting a bit oftopic here but... even in the example given .... When you drive you must wear a seatbelt. . ...still implies the presence of the choice. One can choose to not comply. It is a bit like the difference between "freedom" and "liberty". Freedom exists only in the context of a society whereupon liberty is independent of it and is a personal choice. One can take the liberty to ignore the constraints of freedom. Edit: If anything "must" signals an urging and "have" is an outright enforcement.

Well in my case, I'm here to deliver the helluva spanking what they deserve Wg holds all da cards so.... it is on them.

No. In that phrase "must" still implies the existence of a choice. I mean you can disagree but....

Lolz.... Buddy A is an A not a B.

Oh my..... do you know the difference between "must" and "have"?? A friendly advice, don't start a debate with me or engage me in a debate. especially not over words. But since we are here 'must" implies the existence of a choice, whereupon "have" is putting emphasis on the lack of it. So, like I said.....All you gonna achieve is to giving me talking points.....