Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Andrewbassg

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25837
  • Clan

    [OZYR]

Everything posted by Andrewbassg

  1. And I already explained to you why correlation is the proper word in the title, but not in your comment. And again I made it crystal clear what I meant by that. :) Thank you. Now can you do that for everybody?. Like I said equal chance. As for RNG.... I already explained the..... odds :) Otherwise I'll report back on my findings:)
  2. So... yelling at someone because of anger reasons is a......conscious choice?
  3. I don't want to be special. I want equal chance. I want what's mine, not of others. Otherwise....let's just say that I know what being a VIP means. All on merit, no moneyz involved.
  4. Yes. But not what you wrote. Also because we talk about an RNG based mechanic we cannot speak about direct causality. So yes correlation was the proper word. That's what I wrote. If they by inaction or by other means cause the rise of toxicity, they are100% responsible for their inaction. and their decisions.
  5. Lolz......isn't the gaming industry is supposed to elicit emotional responses? Like every other form of entertainment? Which is quite ironic like how Wsdgie manages to perform in that area.
  6. Yes and no.. I see in prism of mounting personal experience a hidden correlation. Erm... nobody can "rig" RNG. However one can increase likelihoods, ergo to manipulate it And we know that Wedgie likes that..
  7. I said hidden correlation. I have no evidence other than personal experience, which means that I cannot claim. as fact. a causality.. They are not responsible for other people\s actions. However they are 100% responsible for their actions. Or inactions.
  8. Btw...nope. In most cases is not a conscious choice and more so, reducing the likelyhood of the occurence of toxicity should be the primary choice. Which Weegee simply refuses. Also, it would improve gaming experience.
  9. Oh.... i just merely anticipated that spin. Remember Otherwise, again your assertion implies a loose two way "connection" while I stated a more direct connection. They are both.. "connections" but not of the same kind. How is Weegee not responsible for Cv's?
  10. Undoubtedly. But I start to see more and more a direct causality. Across two servers.
  11. And that was my point. Of course it does. If the source is from within the game, then the devs while not guilty, they are 100% responsible for it. As an extreme example, if your car's breaks fail and as a result people die, you are not guilty however you are responsible for that if it was caused by your negligence. Period.
  12. Ermm.....this is not about politics. However the comment is interesting in many many ways. Yes propaganda is about manipulation, but it is also a form of disrespect towards other people. Because implies an inferiority of those who are targeted by. However in my case I consider everyone my equal.We all are players of this game . Also only misinformed people can be manipulated. and I want more information to be accessible to everyone .Many posts of mine are about sharing and disseminating information.
  13. Absolutely. Nope. It is a causality not a correlation. The latter implies two way. Nope. Someone "being" toxic could be for a good number of reasons. For example in game Cv's. Or personality problems. Or having an earlier argument with the wife.
  14. Again depends on the definition. Some people's failure is other people's success. For me getting 4 stars in AEGIS is a failure. For others could be a success. Otherwise, like I said coop. I doubt that Wedgie's port is limited in any way.
  15. That kinda depends on the definition of being.... "naughty" For a hooker for example will have a very different meaning vs an old school housewife.:)
  16. Well lets see, we already know that MM could be manipulated. There were attempts at using skill based MM at various times and modes like brawis.all officially acknowledged. Then we had all sort of goal specific missions, which were quite hard to fulfill , because MM just refused to give the condItions necessary. In english there were missions in which one had to deal DMG (or destruction) to specific ships based on nation or other criteria's. Yet even if people took in the respective ships MM refused to cast them. Repeatedly. While in coop that is kinda mirrored. So the question of MM being 100% neutral is already answered. Meaning nope. Then it is simply a matter of credibility. Well....lets;' just say that Wedgie is working very hard ( and quite efficiently) on squandering that.
  17. So.... I played some T10 randoms and ....omg. I was used to subs I played lots of ranked so it wasn't like a first encounter. But man the sheer amount of retardness which went into the development of this sh#t. is just....unbelievable. There are ships who have only forward firing ASW and their range is at max 1.5 km . Sub torp range 14 km 1.5 vs 14 km Who TF was that retard who thought that this is a good idea?!? WTF that ship is supposed to do?? Yo press G homie let's join the party??
  18. Comrade....I already told you do not question the wisdom of the Great Designers. It is not healthy. Rest assured everything is working as intended and is going according to the plan. Also keep calm and don't believe the fake news on various medias, chose to listen only to the trustworthy news outlets.
  19. Come on guys....its just business as usual
  20. Andrewbassg

    Support carriers closed conceptual test

    It could be viceversa. At this point...
  21. Andrewbassg

    Support carriers closed conceptual test

    Yeah. But not engine Boost coz Weegee needs more press W monkez...
  22. Andrewbassg

    Support Carriers Сlosed Conceptual Test (DB 305)

    Hey Yabba is Subbo back??
  23. Andrewbassg

    Support carriers closed conceptual test

    Yo remember we all have been there at point or another...... Weege "we are testing and working diligently on Cv plane spotting". Also Weegee: "in the meantime we decided to add some more Cv's"
  24. I wonder WHEN will Wedgie address the problem with the AI? I just had a run in which Raptor stopped in open water and we lost. I had to bump him to start moving , but it was too late. Not to mention the fact that now even when one tooks out the Cv his plane are still attacking. The last time it was on rotation sanking the Cv "demoralizedȚ his planes so there was a certain reward doing that. And I wonder if Wedgie is actually trying to make us hate the frikkin pos dishonesty even friggin more. if that's even possible. Why Wedgie? What is this idiocy? Edit: I reviewed the replay to see what was the cause Really? I don't understand we already know that scripted bots CAN push even if there are wreck lying around ( i.e Convoy) So.....What the....??!?
×