Andrewbassg

Look who I encountered helming a sub :)

Lo Hi :)

Actually I have to revisit this whole dumbness again because a) the actual range is less, around 1.1 to 1.3 depending on ship. b) having such a.... ridiculous range means that if you try to chase a sub....because that's were your ASW will shoot 1) you will not catch him. 2) no depth charges will ever land near him, instead they will explode around your hull as you advance. So 1.3 vs 14 km And then again... this range actually translates to zero because you are going towards your target so.... when the depth charges explodes it will be under you. Summa summarum you have a weapon....which is not a weapon.... Gj Weegee. How you managed to come up with that degree of retardness..... I have no clue. Image spam removed. Arty_McFly

I don't need proof to state my opinion based on personal experience and on facts. Lol. Whole countries were and are tricked by simple sentences, so they should stay away from interacting with other countries? Correction: it is not just math. Otherwise, why not?. If we keep crossing red lines... why not? Lolz..... I didn't. However in my experience ( meaning the posts that I did see) that's your main thing. If you are disputing the validity of my observations you should reference your posts critical of Wedgie. And you need around 400 to cross the 1% mark. No I'm not. I do believe that RNG is being manipulated.

I should add 3) the +/-2 tier Cv MM makes impossible to balance AA 4)The fact that one strike is guaranteed, makes it dishonest.

No I'm not. You are siding with Wedgie in 99% of the cases. Why are you doing that...idk. But you doing it..... is a fact. Otherwise you have a point and....you don't. No human can be free of bias and is inherently part of the human nature, but it is good to recognize a bias and its possible consequences. And no requirements lol. other than accepting that truth never harms. No the "propaganda" trick is how you formulated your opinion, not the fact that you have an opinion. Otherwise I unconsciously recognized the problem in your post and i pointed out. Now be a good boy and take to own advice. Yo see that's the problem with the so called bias. You keep telling me that correlation is math, which is true. But I'm telling you that correlation as a concept exists in every other scientific field also , which is also true. But you keep telling me that correlation is math, which I never disputed. and that math is a science which also didn't dispute. Lol. And that is yet another example on how propaganda works. You tell me. I never brought up sleepiness. You did. By...reading the forum? How much of your 34k post are critical of Wedgie? So.... how many posts of you are critical of Wedgie?

The problem is that we don't know when they say the truth. How many times you stood in the queque longer when there were clearly enough players in it? Oh I do understand :) What you are not understanding is that's not how RNG manipulation works. Also I never pretended that skill doesn't play a part. But increasing likelihoods is how RNG manipulation works. And where the shells are landing is still determined by the server, right?

Good one:). in fact every human is a prism, after all.

And that's literally what I said all along. There could be casual correlations and there could causal correlations. And those two a very different. And there could be just correlations if there is not enough evidence to support neither one or the conditions are such that preclude a definitive answer. And no correlation is not just math, but it is applicable to every field of science. Tbh I fell victim to your "propaganda" trick. I didn't realized what was off in your comment. That's the problem with propaganda and indoctrination: tries to rewrite definitions which preclude and hinder communication. Because it "works" destructively both ways. Not if they in the process distort basic 'things" like declaring math as being the only real science. Then it becomes a bias. It doesn't change the fact that 1+1=2, however could negatively influence and hinder development. And your case clearly proves that.:) For example in the USSR it was accepted as a basic scientific fact that capitalism therefore liberalism and democracy would be superseded by their societal organization. Well ....it wasn't the case right? And the effects of that distortion we still see today. I was subject of that distortion so I know why it is harmful for development. So, again, no if in the process of teaching they distort basic facts. Like math being the only real science :). No, I'm not. And I would advice you to relay that suggestion to Wedgie instead. We are both players of this game, yet you side with Wedgie in 99% of the cases. So what statistics says in this case?:) Are you a player of this game?:) But tbh as a human I can see human reasons for why you are doing it. Nevertheless it is pretty much a fact. Yo ,we need a debate on facts. :) Otherwise "things" are accepted as facts if they are able to withstand the process ofscrutiny either scientific or otherwise. Petting your belly is not a process of scrutiny.

Gotta love this community..... To be honest I'm quite fascinated by the gaming culture. Otherwise: yo, "girl" don't substitute your simpleton motivations to mine's, lols..... That's actually a good point. It is correct that being chatbanned hinders communication. Mostly I found workarounds so.....it is manageable. However it is a good argument against disabling chat and putting people on blacklists. Otherwise : yes I'm mad but not for what you think, girl.

. I repeat to you if two things happen in the same time, in the universe, they are correlated by the time factor, even if nothing else. That can happen even repeatedly and then you have a casual correlation. Yo, I think that you need to get your head out of math. Math is good and important, but is time to learn a bit more. A LOT more. Which I never disputed. However like I said in case of RNG based mechanics this is not how things work.. Reread what I wrote. "Because causality implies only a binary result as an outcome while Mm being RNG based is not possible to manipulate it in this way. However RNG absolutely could be manipulated by increasing the likelihood of a certain outcome i.e. altering the chances. As a modus operandi RNG can be manipulated by what data is fed into it. You know why there is after every update an influx on report of bad dispersion? Because RNG has not enough data to calculate it because it resetted itself , so the extreme cases are more prevalent. Wegie;s RNG doesn't spit out numbers it spits out chances." But it is an asset, especially in case of teacher-children relationship. Because it could hinder their development. Instituting values is very important, but it is equally important to evaluate what values are instituted. Learn to scale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness Yo that's not math, bud. I'm not judging you, I'm judging your actions. Every person can learn from past mistakes and correct his ways.

Well the problem is that Wedgie have lied about an awful lot of things. Of course it can be. Lets say that you withhold the number five, 5 times out from 10. You are are assuming that the same RNG is used everywhere. To be honest I kinda see a tiered system. No doubt about it. However, I stated that I based my conclusions on personal experience and some facts. Whatever you may think I'm not a flat earther. Did Wedgie lied to us repeatedly in the past? Of course. If it was de facto can be disputed. However not that it was in effect.

Of course you did. That's why the colonel is a "sh%t teacher".

Ofc it does. Two events can happen at the same time, yet not be correlated by any other condition. Therefore they are casually correlated. See wat? In this case I see a causality. They absolutely can be. They can be worse teachers, per se. They can talk sh%t otherwise. And stop colluding exact sciences with wows. lolz... Lolz. I'm not the one who is colluding sleep with consciousness. That's you. Same as above bud.

Yeah ofc I'm the troll when Wedgie tries to insert Cv based stun bombs....brilliant.....

So...... I came to the conclusion that there is a not so hidden correlation between being chatbanned ( or being naughty in other ways) and having the "blessing" of being on the loosing team by having....hkhmm..... (how to put it politely..._ _lets say.....) "potatoes on your team. While my conclusions are based entirely on personal experience, we already know that MM can be manipulated in various ways.. There is plenty of evidence for that anecdotal and even otherwise. So.....wazzup Wedgie? Want to have fun with us ? Then lets have some.

Ermm...are you familiar with the concept of a closed system? A closed system's performance could only be evaluated by, in our case, by personal experience. More so, personal experience still stays at the very basis of science if it is coupled with scientific rigor and scientific method. While I never pretended to present bullet proof evidence for what I'm talking about, which is of course impossible, I've seen enough evidence for the possibility of it. Indeed it is based on personal experience.

Yo, both of you forget that we talk about Wedgie here. How about that stun sh%t combined with some DOT generating capability? Ya know......just for.... "fun" .....and to guarantee that people will actually start playing them.

Because correlation could be casual not just causal. I started a thread not a debate. Because asserts the value of the explanation. Did you see some of those messages? How much of them are perfect "grammatically"? I wonder why is that. Did you heard about sleepwalkers?. They make decisions, choices and some are even capable of talking. But are they conscious?

Of course I do . And that's why in the title it is appropriate to use the word. Because causality implies only a binary result as an outcome while Mm being RNG based is not possible to manipulate it in this way. However RNG absolutely could be manipulated by increasing the likelihood of a certain outcome i.e. altering the chances. As a modus operandi RNG can be manipulated by what data is fed into it. You know why there is after every update an influx on report of bad dispersion? Because RNG has not enough data to calculate it because it resetted itself , so the extreme cases are more prevalent. Wegie;s RNG doesn't spit out numbers it spits out chances. Lol we are on page three because you keep trying to "explain" to me what correlation is when I made it clear what actually is.. No bud I love the game too just not the company. As a comparison a math teacher could love math and yet hate the book from which he must ...'teach' I would love to but.....you seem to not letting me. To you maybe. Actually he did. He tried to point out that decision and choice could be misinterpreted. And he is correct.

No. You see i'm not speculating about things i don't know. like what would be their motivation behind doing something like that. t talk about my experience and I talk about, things that we do know. If we believe what they are saying. The problem is that their words and actions are in a stark contrast. They said that they will look up and test ways to improve Cvs spotting and yet they seems to be scrapping that idea and instead insert more CV's with even more retarded mechanics. You are assuming that the mechanic was not part of the game from day one.

Nope. You see that's how propaganda works. Otherwise my first explanation to you still stands. Of course you are.:) Explanation would imply impartiality. In your case you lack credibility in that department. Derailing a thread is well known and employed forum tactic. I''ll let you do that because the more you talk the more talking points you give to me :) We can argue on definitions if you want, but a human absolutely can perform various task while paying little to no attention to what he is doing.

Oh yes now I see the problem. You see I knew unconsciously that something was off and weird. I fixed for you. Not to mention the follow up spin. I don't want to debate. I'm stating my personal experience. You want to debate those and my conclusions ( of course in order to discredit my stance. It is also known as veiled ad hominem :)) While we are all humans, we are not the same and we are quite varied.. Otherwise no, choice is not always conscious. An urge and a choice from the outside could look the same, however they are not. For example we don't know for sure that Wedgie's decision to disregard their part in creating toxicity is conscious or not. That being said it is still their responsibility.

Btw can you do that trick for cv's too? i mean.....waving is not such a big deal isn't it?. And......I don\t mean RNG or stuff, but proper implementation. A LOT of people will thank you for that :)

Typing, yelling, spoking are all forms of communications. I have no problems conveying emotions in writing. Nope. It is a choice, but is not necessarily conscious. Please stop spinning all sort of wheels. it will lead nowhere.