Andrewbassg

Lolz......and what exact sciences have to do with.... witches? Furthermore.... ....which part of this ain't clear?. Yo personal experience created science not the other way around. Otherwise, I can safely say that I know a LOT more than you about marxism. One of my grandfathers was an illegalist. If you want proof we can go on by PM.

Well yes. And...... no. Watching a sport is personal, not at least because you see the and a person not just an avatar And a nick. Otherwise we gonna debate personal taste?

Well.....not exactly. "We" "need" better management and also more motivated devs This is completely wrong and actually in a way dangerous. it is the direct result of the marxian, ergo materialist sociology creeping up into places where it has none. Societies were never created but have always formed. By individuals. Spreadsh#t based anything related to humans is completely and utterly wrong especially used solely or deterministically.

Erm.... no. Sport is sport. and entertainment is entertainment, not at least because there is no " yo those are my bois": identity components attached to it. And there are other differences as well.... Again I'm just sayin...

Yo.... no. That's not how entertainment works..... Also, remind me what is the title of the thread? Anyway i'm just sayin....

Well ...actually it does. i personally greatly prefer flambass for a gazillion of reasons. Most and foremost because he actually likes the game.

Erm........no. Wows is about playing. Kots is about playing it...better. And watching it.

Well.... you need something to set them apart from dd's, other then the... blub blub.... or you want them to just spam torps around mindlessly?. For example a certain con in which the torps are aquire homing more easily, stuff like that Also the beeping sound as the topr close in... ..Anyway it is just an idea. :) Yeah they kinda do that aren't they?

Yes i know. it is clear that they have no idea how to make them work without busting the game or making them dull. Hence the thread.

The biggest problem of the rework is that it didn't go all the way. Cv's will remain in essence no matter what a strategic class, because of the different game play (planes vs guns) Instead of making them more in line with the other ships the rework still puts emphasis on their strategic role.

Yes and...no. The problem is if subs can't do reliable damage then nobody will play them. Then Wedgie will be compelled to make them busted. As we actually see it happening. With auto "homing" torps ...it is matter of balance. Also could provide variety for the different nations.

Oh....ok:). Being bad and being a griefer class is not the same thing. One can be a griefer class, but tolerable making it a matter of bad implementation. So there 's that. Otherwise, tho I did that countless times.... This is a PvP game. 1) Cv's are hard to lit up or to flood. 2)Cv;s can launch planes all three of them when on fire or flooded. 3)Cv;s can produce planes again all three of them when on fire or flooded. Coz Cv 's don't take module damage to those capabilities when every other vessel does. 4) Cv's don't detonate when IRL.......so lolz This is just the base setup. No interaction yet and it is already.... not "bad" but outright dishonest. And then on top of all that retardness we also have spotting. Which admittedly i consider the most toxic part of Cv;s it is laughably easy to point out the failings of the rework. Coz there are waay too many.

So......i've seen some pictures. We definitively need those flag awards back Also they make a pretty compelling case against stun bombs.

I think we need those back.

Well.... he suggested that he needs..... arguments..... You never know with who you are talking to.

Yo...... don't try that sh#t propaganda and misconstruing coz......

Of course they are. So lets see.... this game in essence is about the interaction of three classes. Cv;s are quite arguably a griefer class, meaning that the game is perfectly playable and enjoyable without them, ergo their presence is wholly unnecessary and not required. Period. And then you add a second griefer class and in order to make them.... sellable you throw out any pretense of balance And you "test" them continuously in live game. Yo......lolz.... dafaq is this sh#t?? And the problem is, quite arguably, just like with Cv's, that instead of making them....acceptable the accent is to make them sellable so...

So.....this company and particularly this game is managed very inept. This is a game company but should have switched long ago to a hobby company model. Which is in essence a conservative business model in which values are preserved and cherished not routinely demolished. Why? Because it is and will always remain in essence a niche game. For a gazillion of reasons, starting with its pace, setting and its appeal.No amount of meddling around will change that and doing things which are contrary to that, will result only in short term gains and even that with a big question mark.

You can believe in whatever you want, however the very idea to force a company to do X,Y X things is fundamentally retarded because a) it is coercion which is futile, education works not that b) it is and rightfully should be used as last resort only and only in extreme cases c) in this particular case (I mean Wedgie) it should be deployed frakkin routinely.d) I'm willing to help, but WTF??!!Ii want to play the game, not that sh#t. Subs are a big issue however it is only the tip of the iceberg. I will follow up with some explanations.

Everybody predicted just like with stun... bombs how dumb and retarded the idea was. I stopped playing Randoms as a direct result.

Well..... a LOT. It took an awful amount of time and energy and sacrifices to try to show Wedgie the wrongness of their ways. Some things changed..... some didn't. The problems is one of mentality. One can't change almost a century of mentality overnight.... It is tiresome to keep needing to explain elementary things. Wedgie takes one step forward and three backwards.

Lol. That's not what happened.....

Turry? As..... FCKTRRY? Ffs.....

The very fact that people needed to explain to the devs why this is a bad idea, makes the above comment all more true. And everything i also just said mandatory, not optional. Also... Wasn't something about testing failure? Now I'm from a former marxist country so I'm kinda immune to this kind of sh#t , but is a problem of credibility Well...you have a point and also not. There is also a reason why this is happening, sadly....

All that being said, people, we need to remember, that the people who we interact here, are not the ones who make the decisions. They just drew the shorter end of the stick.