Andrewbassg
Players-
Content Сount
3,800 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
25837 -
Clan
[OZYR]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Andrewbassg
-
Can somebody explain to me why the counter didn't reset itself? I mean how we are supposed to know where we stand? Just sayin....
-
No its not. 1. Of course it is. However it is not implemented in wows. 2. Nobody claims that wows is a simulation game, However there is a not a small difference between a simulation game, and our case where AA magically stops dealing damage to an attack run. Not to mention the release of the RU cv line which is specifically designed to circumvent attrition and its supposedly beneficial effects. 3.And?. I never said that Cv's should not deal damage. Who would play them then? Furthermore I said that nerfing Cv's was never the answer. However there is a long way from not doing damage to what we have now. Tell me how it is possible to balance AA if Cv's can see +/-2 tier ships? Or ships without any AA? 4. You mean where the TB's got quite famously massacred? That one? Yes and no. Actually persistent anecdotes can turn into quite powerful arguments Then there is the question why they are persistent And attrition is irrelevant when there is a whole line designed to circumvent that. Look.....I don't have a problem with..."planes". However how Cv;s are a implemented, I have a big problem with that
-
Except.... "On the night of 4–5 May 1942, Błyskawica was instrumental in defending the Isle of Wight town of East Cowes from an air raid by 160 German bombers. The ship was undergoing an emergency refit at the J. Samuel White yard where she had been built and, on the night of the raid, fired repeated rounds at the German bombers from outside the harbour; her guns became so hot they had to be doused with water from the River Medina. Extra ammunition had to be ferried over from Portsmouth. This forced the bombers to stay high, making it difficult for them to target properly. The ship also laid down a smokescreen hiding Cowes from sight. The town and the shipyard were badly damaged, but it is generally considered that without this defensive action, it would have been far worse. That was one, meaning 1 DD. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORP_Błyskawica#Operational_history
-
Erm.....there is no P2W in wows. Furthermore there are people who play just T1. Otherwise... nobody. Well except Wedgie to...... make money. Questions? Erm....are you sure about this chief?. I can respond, but I'm not into..... abusing minors.
-
I've read your idea when you posted it. It is a good Idea and obviously you put a good deal of thought into. The...problem is that Wedgie will not implement something, which doesn't have a monetary gain attached to it.
-
Ermm...and what would that be? There are no T1 premiums..... Exactly how being defenseless in a PvP game equals to you 'good game design"? Yo......
-
Not to mention the fact that no Cv games exist.
-
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
False. False. I never said they should be banned. False. Cv threads were actively censored, banned and obstructed. For years. How can u present a solution If it is silenced?. No sht Furthermore why anyone should even try to think a solution, if it is deleted? Again false. For the aforementioned reasons with the addendum that a) it is not the players job to come up with a solution .b) The very number of them should start ringing alarm bells unless they are intended this way Again false. I never said "moo" not at least because even if Wedgie looks upon us as milkcows I'm not one of those. Tho to be honest perhaps I should do that to every devblog announcement from now on. Actually.... it seems like a good idea. So how many falsehoods can be crammed into one comment? it seems that the answer is::.... Yes!! Yo no......unless they are willingly ignore their own users. But even in that case retard is much more appropriate Still we have no direct proof for that tho ...we have strong circumstantial evidence. Or the game is used for something else...... -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
So I just had a ranked with an Ru Cv which reminded me in no time just how much lies, falsehoods, misinformation and a good amount of "victim" blaming ( which should came as no surprise..... given the obvious), had been said in this thread masquerading as..."player opinions'. Just the sheer amount of shamelessness put on display ..is just breathtaking and also inane. Gj "Wedgie", the more you talk, the clearer the character flaws will be. -
Nyet comrade, it needs careful balans studies, in the form of spreadh#ts.
-
Classic......
-
Ahh ......yes it seems so...
-
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
No, the problem is that WG is thoroughly uninterested in player experience or in actual work. They just interested in da moneyz. -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
We don't shout. That's shouting You want the megaphone version? I did take action. During our Potiemkin event I realized that having separate communities played into Wedgie's hand so I I kinda "coordinated", cross posted news and threads between EU and NA. You really don't want that example, because a) it didn't succeeded b) it was nothing more than a bloodbath. You want us to run around and hunt down WG staff? Just....lolz There were endless discussions and proposals about Cvs, only to get dutyfully ignored or actively censored, so people are kinda tired to not being listened to. And every sane company, seeing the inane amount of feedback, should have a long time ago at least have a good look at, why it is talked about soo much for this long. No....this is just pure old laziness and unwillingness all on Wedgie's part. People have pointed out constantly and consistently that tying DCP to defeating ping is just simply wrong, since it was introduced and yet Wedgie still gives a flying frakk about it. So don't blame the players quite falsely for Wedgie's failings -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Oh come on now....I'm just having fun . Why have to be such a kill joy?:P And I fully diagnosed at least two bugs. Thank you for your service. -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Look... I don't care if Wedgie makes a sh3tload of money from the game. in fact the more they make, the merrier is. Just don't frakk up the game in the process. Otherwise.... it s too late for that. The damage has already been done. And that's one of the problems with spreadsh#t based decision making, its is always acts in past tense and in reaction. Yes I know that Wedgie tend to react to Cv problems rather.... quickly:) Otherwise, please provide at least half amount of the posts asking for harsher ec as posts about Cv's being "bad" . Deal? -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Yo....I swear, your posts are getting funnier by the second now . Isn't the problems with Cv;s are a bit older than that? And who put up for sale T9-T10 for moneys, me? Which also conveniently circumvent the protected MM Yo..... -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Well.... I couldn't care less if it is hilarious or not. I'm interested in the game being in a better shape and place. If that means delivering a helluva spanking to Wedgie...... Tho I'm not gonna deny, that in itself could be fun. Tho i try to not abuse that. Are you frakkin kidding me?? Roadmap video ' we will remove.....ermm... separate the ec benefits from cammo;s and flags, possibly remove the possibility of stacking them, because..... it was requested by the players" Dafaq are U talkin about?? -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
One could assume that someone .........actually pays attention or care? -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Oh.....A screenshot is factual. Now if there are other accounts..... but that's just unproven speculation Btw isn't that lovely how he/she keeps insulting me in order to the thread to be closed....:P -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
-
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Ermm.... As context Turry who is a streamer pointed out with sceenshots that the devs, on their official accounts have very low number of battles. And you.... because I was certain that you know the whole ordeal. Then you You talk about WG staff streaming. But.....I didn't said WG I said devs. So..... To which you Just.....lolz. Are U trying something or you just play dumb? -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
now I have to explain to you what humor is? You have yet to prove that. Of course it is. Again you have to prove that. Yes that is indeed the problem. -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
I must have dreamed them, right? Otherwise I wasn't specific but you were so.... -
Seems that Wargaming staff have stopped commenting on submarine threads.
Andrewbassg replied to The_Angry_Admiral's topic in General Discussion
Of course it is. The amount of them itself mr Data. :) BTW removing Cv;s is not the solution. Nor nerfing them. Proper implementation is.
