Andrewbassg

Well yes but it is good to keep in mind that "modern" stuff ( that includes components) is designed around and with much tighter tolerances in mind , hence less.... "gorgeousness". Arguably 80's and early 90's stuff still fall into that category. Sound engineer, bass and keyboard player here:).

They should have left the flag rewards in place...

Avoid as much you can the digital stuff. Or the "modern" editions...

Back to the topic, the date marks the end of hostilities in Europe aka peace . Given that peace is .....yeah. Also just imagine the outcry....

Drums?

Hmmm........

it seems that NA is perplexed as well..... https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/254728-new-survey-i-closed-it-after-first-question/ Edit: Dis one is more funnier... https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/254736-next-weeks-survey/

Wat?

Generally speaking.......

Erm......EA? Just kidding....

Remember comrade, curiosity ki....hkhmm... sunk the cat

That's actually a not half bad point. Still you are missing some key elements, namely 1) They have no clue what role they should fulfill, therefore they cannot design an interaction. 2) it is a classic, bad example of speadsh#t based analysis and decision making. it is always in reaction and never in anticipation. It doesn't matter how much one spread it, it is still sh#t.

As per the title. It is no secret that I consider Cv spotting their most toxic and also outright retarded "feature" and I'm also not alone . If that would be removed I am willing to agree to a meeting at Compiègne, tho.....definitely not Versailles. But no AWACS or minimap. Just begone. There is a video in which arty from Wot(!!) is presented as a positive(!!!) example, also makes a compelling case for why that feature is outright toxic and retarded. Ahskance;s' comment on that video who nobody can call a Cv hater, lolz was..... "The video states that if Person A does <Stuff> to Person B, that it should be an interaction that both parties should enjoy. It might be an attack that A wants to do damage with. If A hits, they'll enjoy that, but B needs to be able to avoid the damage. If the damage is avoided, B will enjoy that. It has the ability to send enjoyment both ways." .

Op.....you are talking about a ship which was designed to do that. Those are 2 battleships. And......this is actually nothing special. Tho it was nice.

Are there other allied ships who can shoot at her? We can play this forever btw :P Edit: Nah, actually you said this.... ....so my bad.

No, not really. What if that BB is on the J line and there is a red dd capping? i mean.... somewhere else...

All ships could be strategically important. However just because a ship has 500 HP and therefore is vulnerable, does not make it the best target. And if he is "getting away" meaning there is no allied ship in the vicinity, could make it a strategic target You missed this part. In the end team composition and the continuously evolving tactical situation dictates what is the best therefore strategic target. All targets are moving and mobile there are no land , therefore fixed targets in wows so....

And still no. A BB with 500 Hp just battle influence has no more. Cvs are a strategic class therefore one attacks strategically important targets. Which means Dd's, radar cruisers and targets which are hard to reach otherwise. That's a good cap.

And I had another game this time was much much worse. Oh boy what i wrote to the poor cap afterwards.......

Soo......who was that bright minded genius who thought that having Cv's in 5v5 is a good idea? Please introduce him to me for a....nice friendly chat it is already retarded to have them in 7v7, tho it is a bit mitigated by the tier disparity. But in 5v5?? Yo....

Actually.. yes, tho it could depend This game is also played for caps and a sub properly backed up and played well.....oh boy. Btw attacking the most vulnerable target in Cv = bad cap, in terms of battle influence.

Erm...... like fair, fun and engaging game experience? I never suggested that those factors are not mutually inclusive. Because that's what Wedgie has done for the last 2 years, crammed ship lines after ships in the game, all the while also selling them, so ....yeah. Its the same tendency so now we should make an exception? i cant unrecognize the wiseness behind that call.

Erm......that's not a fight. We are discussing things. Otherwise the forums can be quite funny and entertaining, sometimes even a LOT more than the game. A1. Yes and no. We are giving feedback. If it is listened .....¯\_(ツ)_/¯ A2. Ditto. Yo yeah Bobby is dope. More ships = even less balance

I know. There are many many reasons for which to held in Wedgie in contempt.