Andrewbassg

And you still don't get it..... We talk about just how failed and how retarded this season is. Reducing the team line up and including Cv's while make it easier to potatoes to promovate...how dafaq that is not an exercise in retardness?? I mean from the pov of quality coz otherwise... I'm sure that is a resounding success. Otherwise... please people make up your mind would you? . A bum rush is by definition a team effort and yet both of you argue to not rely on your team. You can't have the cake and eat it, it doesn't work that way. Thanks for the link. .

Absolutely correct. However people argue, quite wrongly, that the numbers doesn't matter. In a team game mode Ermm....yes and no. I repeat, in ranked one has to bring his contribution to the win. Sometimes you have to do stuff for which the ships is ill suited. You can't just leave the free cap alone, because it could cost the team time, points and the win.

Of course:). But the others have gone to the other cap. So by your reasoning he should not have capped, right? So the red team is already ahead on points and the one cap gets the red teams full attention. Yo.... gg. The morale is that in ranked you have to actually do stuff you can't just sit around waiting to be carried .Having less people in a supposedly team game mode is retarded.

Nope. If the team have split up and the two potatoes have died losing the cap how dat squares out with carrying? Like I said we talk about the whole season's flaws. No amount of mental exercise will change 1+1=2

And I'm pointing out the flaws of the current season. Which includes everything, from saving a star to the inclusion of Cv's. But... let me give you a concrete example An Agir is forced to cap alone coz the others went for the other cap Cv spots him and the whole red team is shooting at him preventing him to cap and he is melted in the process. There is nothing he could do to prevent this. What he did wrong? Is this good game design or an exercise in retardness?

Unless it is 1v1 you have to "rely" on your teammates. If nothing else, to provide targets/tank. So... what is your point? Otherwise... it depends on other conditions, like maps.

You are absolutely entitled to your opinion, however it doesn't make it a fact. Me? Absolutely nothing. I'm pointing out the shortcomings of this ....."ranked" season with reasons and facts. Specifically just how retarded is the implementation. Whether it is intentional or not... that is debatable Congrats for what? Being lucky?

Yo....the base conditions were altered in this season so yes, absolutely.

Yeah sure ..... ....tell that to the poor Musa . He is a 61% WR player. If you think that I cherrypicked.... just look at the timestamp.

Because, like I said in the other thread, a loss of a ship (whether actual or just being AFK) is much more felt. Also you have no control over team composition as classes Otherwise one surely can try, but it is just pure luck if you get usable teammates or not. In 7v7 it was a greater possibility to actually carry people , not so much in this current setup. And Cv's were banned from 7v7 CB's yet here they are.

Nah comrade......you know better than this. So..... nice try, but nope, try again.

Oh comrade....I already told you..... don't conflate your sekrit desires with mines......

That's actually a very good point. Still the conclusions are all wrong, because teams still have to split up, ergo the influence is localized. But it is true that a loss of a ship will have a much more deterministic effect on the outcome. Not to mention two. And also the influnece of the inbread class in this line up actually grows. I know that this is probably the official explanation, nevertheless it is completely retarded and quite false.

There is the reddit thread. Note the trollfarm is downvoting negative comments. Just how pathetic is that.... And the NA thread https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/255387-econcamo-separation-qa-2-second-devblog-dropped-today/

Neither do I. But I'm convinced that this is the actual intention. I mean if you have to hire a frakkin accountant firm for a frakkin game.....the idea is to make it as complicated as possible so you can farm the living begeesus out of the potatoes

Coz I want to actually play the game and... win on merit?? Ya know....aka... fun?

Oh.....Please don't confound your sekrit desire with mine :)

Oh no. In 7v7 one could turn around things with 3 ships down. Ranked now is just what Brawls should have been. I mean other than usually being quickly over, there is no other benefit. Brawl is a fun a sh#tshow. Dis ain't. Also, you have to remember that, I'm convinced that MM is being actively manipulated, even if lightly.

Ofc it was. But not just ranked. The whole shebang. But Wedgie, true to his reputation as being inept, keeps delivering. I mean at this point it is clear that they hate us, with frakkin passion.

There is no tactic which you could reliably use. Wedgie made sure that the mode is as retarded as it can be. With 6v6 they given up on any pretense that people could play for the win, ditto the maps, and the inclusion of the inbread class. It is a complete and utter sh#tshow , intended to make long standing and serious players to give up on this mode.

Don't even get me started on that one...... "Just sail around monke in your ship and do pew pew. What ....thinking??? Nah monke don't do that. Just sail around and do pew pew..."

Oh come on. We both know full well what is the reason for that. In Narai at least you can make some decent earnings without having to bust your [edited]and risk losing time, flags, camo's and fun .Unlike in Newport where even if you manage the 5 star the earnings are nothing but pathetic. And if you don't 5 star, which is kinda the likely outcome just ..... ugh..... I pointed out this repeatedly. for example to Ahskance and he kinda tried to downplay this very real issue, saying that "what I would feel as being equitable for a PvE ( i.e bot played) fixed scenario" when I yet to see him 5 starring out from Newport. So quite naturally, all you will see there is "if Narai", even if this is not the players "fault".. I didn't called your post pathetic. I called out the mimimi.

One thing I learned is that I will NEVER EVER touch any game in the future which is ....hkhmmm...."developed" in St Petersburg

Actually I count Aegis as one of the most boring scenario. To me the top is Narai/Raptor, Newport and then the rest. NEVER ASK AGAIN REMOVAL OF OPS!!! Edit :Otherwise your mimimi is quite pathetic. Scenarios are good, because by them people learn to play their ships, their usage their weaknesses and could develop tactics.

This. WHAT is wrong with this people?? A LOT of players play operations to escape from their failed and frakkin braindead mechanics.TF they want to bring this into ops?? I mean....