Andrewbassg

Try to log out and log in. Worked for me. Otherwise what you see is the results of the conversion. What you had and what you gonna have. No options. It is not meant to calculate how you use those bonuses

Well marxism itself came from western culture so ... But I meant more like in the case of the fall of the Third Reich, when the victors got their hand on the german research on a wide range of subjects ( ex operation Paperclip) that included even Mengele's "research" and alike as repugnant as it is. Absolutely. However it is marxist countries that were the forerunners on materialism and also on mass manipulation. Democracies could hide significantly less dirty laundry, opposed to autocracies.

Which was my point I never claimed otherwise :) In fact... However, I'm quite convinced that in 7v7 his team would have performed much better. I'm judging the change from a wider perspective, as I do usually with everything. Still.... patterns, while do exist, they can be changed and then sees to be patterns. They exist only if the subject is not aware or doesn't care. Unlike in the case of exact sciences.

I know and pretty much I made both points. However reducing the team line ups I don't regard as being good call .up to the poit of calling it a frakk up.

Oh...poor baby ..you just wish that :). You see I'm what you can call a witness. In school we were taught what marxism is, what "scientific" socialism is etc etc then I participated in my country's anticommunist revolution and then I lived thru the transition period from that sh#t to democracy I'm very much seeing the same mentality ( which means forms of control) creeping up into westerns democracies relegating human experience to second place. 

And you are entitled to your opinion. However it won't change the fact that I consider this season frakked up. Very much still yes. I don't consider ranked as being high end competitive, however a comparison and a judgement very much can be made. And still very much yes. That was the original comment to which I replied. Wedgie by its own admission knows full well that the player base is less than stellar. mainly because of their own actions. And yet still proceeded with these changes Oh yes it is. I'm from a marxist country. Yo, nope :). Humans have the ability to change their ways, consciously, if the they chose to do so.

Try to log out /log in.

It does work now. I had to log out/log in and than worked :)

And I'm not anymore. Especially if they reduce the team line ups. It is what I consider frakkin up. Lolz......which directly contradicts the assertion, right? Otherwise no, that's why I like play reduced team line ups. And I consider further reducing the line ups yet another frakk up. Well...I'm not a native english speaker. Otherwise still very much yes if that's what the line of argumentation was actually about. Yo, game design is all about creating possibilities. Also statistical analysis is simply irrelevant, inadequate and outright misleading regarding individual personal experience. Cherry picking would be if I would have that pic stored. However then, it just happened. Yo again that frakkin fascist horsesh#t.... People learn frakkin somethin, humans are not numbers, they have the ability to rise up to challenges and can beat odds. Stop doing and using that reetardness to anything related to humans, let alone individuals. It is wrong from top to bottom, if not outright criminal and murderous. This whole frakkin crap has crawled from former marxist countries into western democracies and now everybody, especially companies, is corrupted by it. Lolz..... I had no idea. But then again, I tend to do this "bullzeye thingy" quite often. We are all gifted in a great many different ways

Thanks. I was. Oddly it works on NA but not on EU....

1. And who said that it was ok? 2. Kots Cb pick your fav. 3.Oh.....there are many many issues. I tend to "cut to the cheese". From my pov it is. And again, who said that it was ok? Their spotting is still in place, so until that will be removed I reserve the right to calling that out. Yes! Otherwise it would be reflective of my capacities so wazz your problem with that?? 1. My bad. Obviously I meant protected MM. Still selling ships which actively circumvent MM ( i.e hybrids) is wrong 2. What you find odd is a "you" problem, not a "me" problem. We obviously attribute different meanings to cherrypicking. I didn't picked out his performance, I pointed out his situation, because of his "team" A is an A not a B. The difference in team size is a and the most significant difference. I mean..9v9 is a brawl or is just randoms? Yeah. no sh#t... And I already explained to you that a) the presence of Cv;s until they can spot will never be ok with me, b) the reetardness of reducing team line ups while increasing it in brawls is also not ok with me. They were equally bad calls. Otherwise I find highly offensive, misleading and outright false your assumption, that teams have no influence on anybody's winrate, because that's exactly what you are implying. I have no problem assuming what is mine, however unless you have a frakkin crystal ball or some frakkin prophetic powers, you should refrain from predictions, concerning my or anybody else's performance. In other words "back" of pal. Capisci? Still just being curious what makes you think that having fun and winning are mutually exclusive concepts for me? Like ...lolz... WTF??

Doesn't works for me.

Yes there are many issues with the game and in extension, also in particular, with ranked, so I'm pointing out them. Whether you agree with those..... that's another question. That's what debates are for. Otherwise, like I said that particular example was intended as a double edged sword, a sort of tit for tat :) Still playing the objectives is actually part of any strategy. How to do that....that's a different discussion. Yeah :).... of course.... that's why I'm arguing for even stricter rules :) Tho quite admittedly I play for fun. To me that means applying and employing combat tactics in and to this game. But I also believe in fair chance, therefore I'm not running any MMM sort of thing, because it distracts from the fun and also tend to act as a self-fulfilling prophecy. The singular, most defining and recognizable trait of a good player is consistency. We except from this, talent, because that is a whole another level.. By that metric indeed I'm not a good player because I put fun before it. Indeed fun is quite a subjective term, but I already defined what is fun for me Otherwise, yes of course, there should be obstacles to overcome, however what should and could be considered obstacle....that's where my assessment differs radically from that of Wedgie's.

It was to counter the argument that a "good player always finds a solution", which is obviously false in a team game. Also in a Musa you are pretty much on the top spot to save a star. And that is supposed to make me feel.. warmer? Around my heart ?While reducing the team line up ergo making them exert even moar battle influence?? Yo..... Yes and that's one of the problems, the second being the absence of qualification rounds into ranked and the third the state of the playerbase to which Wedgie contributed by selling high tier ships which circumvent MM. You want me to continue? Lolz....I'm saying literally the opposite....in the wider context of the state of the game. Coz.... we cant really separate the Moon from the Earth, can't we? What having fun has to do with..."ease"? :) As for the rest... just... lolz... I like(d) ranked for a good number of reasons. And I'm bemoaning the lack of understanding behind the changes, the lack of tier separation. and a LOT of other things. :) I'm am where I deserve to be, right?

Yes. That is very correct. And I keep pointing that out and I keep getting told, as being wrong, lol. Making the team line up even smaller then arguably high end competitive and also more team dependent, how dat squares out with the current state of the game? The example was a double edged sword :) A.... horse from a certain place if you like. Yes. That's the very essence of playing the keep' em busy game. Which I very much like to play in my Neptune or Ibuki. However that tactic relies 100% on the team to succeed.. That in the context of Wedgie selling high tier ships, which also circumvent protected MM. What they are doing now is too little too late and still wrong. And that's the point. Still no pizzaa :)

Nope. At the time of the discussion literally had that battle. Also I never look up stats, to me an opponent is a ship. And to me the measure is how good you do in that battle. Randoms is one thing, ranked is different. And it proves that in a team game, the team does matter.

Well... not only statistically. That is a very good point. As is Krohnstadt.

Lolz ...ok buddy, whatever. I'm trying to point out how many things are wrong with the current season and you are obviously in love with Wedgie so let's call it a day. I cant stop you loving Wedgie nor do I want :)

Yes of course :) Nope. Being critical while being reasonable ...one can't be wrong. I will.

Lols.......You mean 9v9 "brawls"?? The other reetardness ?? You keep trying to bring it down to simple numbers when you full well know that's not the case. Either try for real or don't. Also remind me what is the format for CB battles?. Yo no sh#t.....

WAIT A MINUTE!! He is a staff member?? Yo buddy the reddit trollfarm is bemoaning your absence!! How frakkin pathetic for a company to rely on sh#t like that......

Absolutely is. You look at this problem like a doctor who treat one symptom at a time when you have to look at the bigger picture. Which is wrong. The more players you have the more time you have and the loss of a potato is proportionally less impactful. Yo....

Yes and no. The thing is the less .."bodies" so to speak, less time you have. So while this is nice in theory it doesn't work in the current state of the game and the playerbase.

So you arguing for relying on the team. How that squares out with the argument to not rely on the team? Yes keep'em busy but again how that squares out with the argument to not rely on the team? Coz "team numbers doesn't matter"... And my point was that a loss of a ship is much more felt in a reduced line up so....thanks I guess.