Andrewbassg

Yeeeah... Guilty as charged. Moreso I started the thread about 100K FXP and didn't even noticed the other missions.... Good advices. However... That's what I'm gonna do. + some nice randoms with Nevsky. i have her built for range and fires Coz that's what I'm gonna do anyways....

Umm......what? Edit: Ok so I logged in to take a good look (this time) at the missions..... oopsie. 350 k dmg in spotting... 40. mil potential... 57k BXP...... The rest is exchange. Hmmm..

Yes, but that assumes and requires PvP setting. Try replicate that in coop, coz yes there are coop only players of this game.

Hey there. Well, the requirement of the mission (i.e to gather 100k FXP) it seems a bit rather excessive. Don't get me wrong, the company has every right to determine what asks for its stuff, however.... it is a bit steep. There are people, particularly on NA, who play only coop and to them......yeah. One wonders what's gonna be the requirements for the next dockyard ship, which is much more famous, is a premium and is some tiers higher. Also there is no "or" condition. To make it clear, I personally have no problem fulfilling the mission.

Such a shame that this company doesn't really appreciate the loyalty of its playerbase.... Otherwise, good for you.

I don't understand...Is this an actual question ? Coz...is there a problem with me playing the game just for fun? Is there a problem with playing the game and feeling comfy? Like I said I'm trying to actively avoid grinds. Otherwise, I don't have gazillions of flags or camos, so I want to spend them when I feel and deem as being necessary. Is this a..... problem?

And I don't :) I didn't even know what were the missions:). I just wanted to finish the daily's on NA and I had left like 150 BXp So I said coop and let's see what are the missions. And .....yeah.

Yeah...Well....I'm gonna make my stance crystal clear. Wargaming is a company. It needs money to run and ultimately.... deserves money, so I never gonna call for not spending on this game and also because this is a personal decision and in that realm, I have no place. However, what I don't like is how they always (frakkin always!!) tend to cram multiple goals into one ...lets say "directive" (and I'm not talking about "missions") in order to achieve "maximum efficiency" while completely ignoring other aspects. This is always the case be it about subs, Cv rework, ec rework or even "simple" missions. It certainly doesn't inspire any kind of respect, sorry, it just makes me puke. For example this mission could be used for: a) as a metric to analyze how many people pay attention or want to fulfill the mission also how far they advance b) as a tool to "get rid people" of their flags and camo's c) to "make" people play more ....... And I could go on and on. IF they would use just half of this capacity to actually make the game better.....oh boy....

There is no problem, tho I was a bit shocked to see THAT number. Yes I know. But you do need to spend flags and camos, right? Of course if you want to finish it

Have fun with it.

Well..... to me the first (and probably the last) dockyard ship was Anchorage. I'm trying to avoid grinding as much as possible. But I don't think that you are wrong....

You misunderstood me. This isn't a mimimi post, I know that there are alt means, however I was genuinely shocked to see THAT number. I didn't analyzed the package before hand and when I saw it..... WTF?

That's not an issue at least for me. I crunched 500k less then one week for Laska reasons, but......dat was for Laska reasons. Otherwise are U kidding me? Burn out da stash for a.... tech tree??

Umm..... Cv's are not OP. CV's are 1. A strategic class in a tactical combat game. Their capabilities and strengths lies where every other ship's vulnerabilities and weaknesses are. 2. On top of that they are completely dishonestly implemented, not because they are different and play differently, but because a) they don't have "natural enemies".( not even their own kind!!) b) they have all sort of artificial protections put in place which none of the other classes enjoy c) they are designed in their current form with one goal in mind, to appeal to people who just want to shat on other people with impunity and no consequence to them So, in essence we talk about a frakkin uber, master, "slave owner race" and when people come here trying to talk about their weaknesses the "slaves" don't frakkin quite like it, to put it very mildly. Pretty much like "a rapist complaining about getting harder to find victims", to the victims, while this being a state approved and sponsored activity. And no I'm not exaggerating. For years, any kind of discussions on this subject were censored and actively suppressed, on this very forum, precluding even the possibility of having a good, honest look at the problems, under the disguise of keeping the forum a "friendly place". Like I said there is not one single argument which can be made in the defense of the class no matter by who. The Cv rework represents the biggest failure of Wows and its devs, (well...to date) which literally crippled the growth of this game. Edit....lol this sounds like some very woke thingy, but thats the truth...

Across the board.

I put out 10 to test the waters...

Yuk, guilty as charged :) I had no way to communicate being chat banned.

And the vast majority of players don't. Moreso the problem is that Wedgie persistently refuses to address the issue called Cv's and until recently refused to acknowledge even the existence of a problem therefore people really don't like em. There is not one singular argument which can be made in the defense of them, by anyone, that including any dev of this game. Put it bluntly, they are dishonestly implemented.

Absolutely. Meanwhile in wows.......yeah. Actually..... the fighters arrived first. And the first wave had multiple targets to deal with and also the ships not being yet hit were more maneuverable and faster. No comment.

Well..... People kinda know what a turd is in that respect so.....

Ermm......what do you mean? IRL? The whole IJN task force shot down 10 planes during Ten-Go. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_96_25_mm_AT/AA_gun#Effectiveness If in game..... Poor AA defenses, aircraft carriers will have no trouble striking Yamato https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Yamato

Don't tell me, you love that Cv's dont have ASW.....

Very nice. However I repeat, getting good players on the team is luck. Getting lets say fair ship type compositions is luck. Absolutely. We are all humans and we could have all sorts of situations and we can overcome those situations. Otherwise Neptune is my fav ship so GJ. Yes it should be. However only if that's possible. I'm not blaming the players. However I do blame Wedgie for creating this situation and I do blame Wedgie for compounding it with bad decisions regarding this season. 1.No we don't. Steamrolls are the proof. Otherwise, yes I do believe that MM could be manipulated, however that's not what I'm saying as being the cause. One is solely responsible for his own actions. Still.... this is a team game. 2.No, because individual performance is not a democracy. And again steamrolls exists .Also I'm seeing constantly lols moments but on both sides. And again this is a team game 3.I can pull off things , but not every single game coz I play to have fun. And.... I don't want to be Mbappé :) Especially not in a middle school team:) I play for fun. In my field, in my country I was "Mbappé": I know what it takes to find the strength in oneself, while also just being a game :) , In the past season I very much had fun even in Gold. Still NA is very much frakked up compared to EU. What I started to see on NA 6 moths ago in terms of degradation of the playerbase's quality I'm seeing it now on EU. And I don't like it. And like I said in the other thread, talent is a completely different story.

You have a good point, still competitions tend to have a qualifying round in place. Yes, but that would be contrary to Wedgie;s primary interest of selling stuff.....

Never said otherwise. However if I see a Cv I see red. Especially in ranked.