Andrewbassg

No missions :)

Hmm...... so for me personally it does, Don't get me wrong the rewards are nice and much welcomed. Equipped a LOT of my t10's with permacamo's (da steel one). However, what I'm enjoying most is the reduced line up, therefore the bigger influence, Also the turnabouts. In randoms it is not really possible anymore. Things tend to snowball really quickly. And in ranked one has to do all sort of things, even if the ship is ill suited for that task. You "have" to make it work. Otherwise I agree with the rest.

Yes please gibb...

It was? I mean after stun bombs.......the world wonders..... Btw it is good to know that some things would not change....

i was very frustrated at the start of the season and I still think it wasn't a good idea to reduce the line up. Qualification form bronze to silver was a particularly bad experience. Still in a way i learned to cope by playing one ranked - one random/scenario which require very different playstyles so....and I tend to play randoms nowadays exclusively with long range and fire built Nevsky so.... it is a way to break ....

OPerations :) i have 21 pointers on almost all nations. Which produce ECXP :) And also FXP helps.

Oh com' on guys.... go full gangsta. That's her permacamo. With this.

Aaactually.....there is a noticeable uptick in players quality, even in Newport.....

Ii meant the economic changes.... not specifically to ops...

My very first one shot was performed in her ( didn't decided yet to be a cruiser main) A Leander desperately smoked up around 12-14 km but still broadside-ish to me. She did vanished, all right.... Still i would recommend to get ships which are playable in ops first, given the upcoming changes.....

I think that the recent community token give away is related to the FR cruisers missions being a bit over the top. I could be wrong, but... that's what my gut feeling is telling me :)

Someone summoned me? :) Umm.....lets just say that I reflagged certain ships with the Bad Advice flag.....

Its just plain old maskirovka comrade..... Btw "kutykurutty" we use that word too :)

Ummm....crackdown on Twitchers/Youtubers?

"I know there is a lot of hate for subs. To each their own. But please STOP teamkilling your fellows just because you don't like what they're sailing in! Last night, this happened to me. I was in the Cachalot heading for the center cap. Since it's slow as an American BB, I was overtaken by a Furutaka on starboard and Kotovski(spell?) on port. When the enemy appeared across the cap from us, the two ships started taking fire. The Furutaka made a hard turn and T-boned me, lifting the sub up. I couldn't dive. Stuck on his bow, I became a meat shield for him. I asked why and was told "edit." The guy in the Kot turned and hit my stern, keeping me stuck to the Furutaka and taking rounds for him. He said "edit." These were not enemy ships. We were on the SAME SIDE! It would have been different if I was being focus fired on by the red team. But no, they were "team" mates, supposedly fighting the same enemy. This was infuriating! Why? If you don't like subs, then b!tch and complain. But don't you want to win? I did get the last laugh though. The enemy sub sank the Kot and the Furutaka took citadel hits from a BB. I managed to survive the battle, albeit with very low health. Still, it ruined the match for me. I should have written down their in-game names and submitted a complaint, but I was so shocked or surprised at what happened, so I didn't get them. Iss juss a game. Y u heff to be med?" https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/255886-stop-teamkilling-subs/ Removed insults and corrected text color. Please remember that red coloring is only allowed for moderators and WG staff. - SkipperCH

Hi there. I see:)

Well.... the idea was that somebody is trying and I tend to give credit where is due, so.... otherwise I'm not for sale. Too old for that :)

Yes but.....I think a LOT of people had done it already.

We were gifted with 500 comm tokens unconditionally. If you log in. On the the background that the last log of the FR cruiser missions being a bit.... demanding.

Umm....wat? You somehow think what you wrote was a ......proper explanation?? Ugh......ok. And btw that appeared after I quoted you, but I'm sure that it was a honest mistake. I'm not keen on accusing people of whatnots and you are not ill intended based on your posts. I mean you are biased, but not that biased Erm.....you either use past tense or you don't. Otherwise you accused him of the same thing so... wazz the problem?. And if you did educate people then good for you, however I didn't saw those actions. Its not an argument. You accused him of the same thing and I turned the favor back. Literally. And.... yourself are indicating why this is not a valid approach so.....thanks I guess?. Coz.... speaking of double standards, right? Right? I never claimed that you never done it. What evidence? That Cv;s are poorly implemented and in fact enjoy all sorts of artificial protections? Well ....lets just say that facts are facts and 1+1=2. And I'm 100% convinced that Wedgie by not addressing the issues presented by Cv's is making a giant mistake. And ...I'm an agency of one and I have one voice. Wedgie is quite literally everything. Which means quite a bit of "tier disparity", so to speak. Isn't that factually correct? .I'm not responsible for your thoughts. Even if they regard me. I keep telling people to stop calling Cv's OP. They are objectively and factually different, not just OP. Not reducing that gap is Wedgie's primary fault. Well......the jury is still out there, on that one.....

Oh my......ook. Nobody is stopping you to write a field manual on how to "just dodge". In fact... why you didn't do that already? Coz you like to accuse..... Edit: I have no problem putting my semi round part on the line. https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/249862-fair-and-very-balancedyeeah/

I think the scuttling mechanic is missing from the game.....

Erm.....what you have to understand (and that will answer many of your points) is that "freedom" is not the same as "liberty". Freedom is always relative and therefore externally conditional, whereupon liberty is always subjective, therefore personal. One can always choose to take the liberty and ignore the constraints of freedom. The prevalence of double Cv games at lower tiers directly contradicts your assertion. Also the fact that this is still ongoing, means that is not contrary to Wedgie's interests for whatever reason. in fact, reinforces the opposite assertion. So there you go. Erm......absolutely not. Are you telling me that keeping slaves is.... moral? Because..... I pet my belly? Yo..... Still one can decide what degree of morality will personally pursue and under which circumstances. Which points us to the importance of context. And personal education. Are you gonna tell me now that this guy was..... "right" insofar as the supremacy of the law goes? Yo........ and that pretty much applies to every time you bring up the EULA. Nobody defends that. However, dismantling the arguments in favor of maintaining the status quo could leave that impression, even if it is completely false. Of course I know that :) However you rule out the possibility of a wide consensus among players. Which happens to be shared or at least acknowledged by Wedgie. Absolutely. However personal choices still can be called out for the arguments already presented. I agree. However the context is that Wedgie does nothing to address the core reasons for it. Lol. You mean moar childish than Wedgie doing nothing? And in fact compounding it? I never claimed that any right could back that up. Unless there is a wide consensus on the validity otherwise we would still be keeping slaves. Right? You mean like...FCKTRRY? ... And those are the..... judges, right? Not even remotely close. And I never claimed otherwise. Again, the different playstyle is not the problem. You may want to initiate a search for forum posts stating such intents. There is quite a LOT of em. But.... That's exactly the opposite of what I'm doing. I'm not denying the human reasons to play Cv's. However I'm pointing out what they are. Maybe the reason is stemming from Wedgie's inability and unwillingness to properly implement the class. If not that was the actual intent. Otherwise I agree and it makes it even more puzzling and dumbfounding the... motivation. Still there were plenty of Cv players who fiercely defended the class, no matter the means, bringing plenty of contribution to their negative perception. That's not bad however it is incomplete and quite intentionally vague. Also conveniently completely ignores the PvP component of this game.... ....just.... lolz. Oh...I'm ready to meet at Compiègne if spotting would be removed. :) And no I'm not a Dd player. :) One word for you: FCKTRRY. Read above. Again read above. in case you missed: FCKTRRY Otherwise, I agree, the word is not in there. Nope. Tho.... I could probably agree with the last.... "assement"

I'm not.

Erm.....that's not what I meant. So I'm gonna repeat in other form. In the relationship Wedgie - players Wedgie is in an obvious power position. How what Wedgie does and decides is not ultimately "seal clubbing"? That's what I meant. And now separately... Yo, no :). It is not a half bad argument but still no. You see the problem isn't the "different mechanic" which allows you to do X or Y, the problem is the whole context, which again, includes the artificial protections bestowed upon the class and Wedgie's general attitude towards them. In other words using Cv's wouldn't be abusing if the context would be different. While "legal" it doesn't mean that it is moral. Erm....why is that?, You just made the argument that if it is legal, its not an abuse :) Yo, sorry, arguments doesn't work that way, Either you eat the cake or you have the cake :).Pick one. That is 100% correct!. However personal choices, if impact other people, can be legit called out. Like somebody not taking vaccines when there is a pandemic. Neither do I. Yes. And also no. Can you break social rules to point out to people, that they need to get vaccinated, which is otherwise a personal choice? Yes. Like selecting Cv in the port and pressing battle. Yes. And its a personal choice which affects the whole team, which means that it could be called out. Right? There you go. Cv's objectively and factually posses several edges over surface ships, which are NOT resulting from their inherently different playstyle but are stemming from their faulty implementation. Arguably there is no such thing in PvP games, generally speaking. Because one always have to do something, in order to win. That's a good point. However the same argument can be made against selecting a Cv in port and pressing battle for the very same reasons. And I repeat personal choices can be called out if impact other people. See anti vaxxers Yo.... petting your belly it doesn't mean that you actually said something. See above. Actually very much yes. Feel free to provide your definition. And.....how dat contradicts my point? And i agree. However the point is valid concerning what is considered as "being legal" Every personal decision is ultimately subjective, so.... But....that's not the point. The point is the problems what the faulty implementation of Cv's causes. Ermm....not really. Even the legal system recognizes the difference between conscious choice and one forced upon one by circumstances. Also explain that to every independence and/or social movement in the world. Not really. And still very much not really. Actually...no I'm not.