Andrewbassg

Yes. Which bring back us to interest and motivation, hence metric. How rational is from long term game health pov what they are doing? That's not € too? New maps, operations? Double Cv games?? True. But there is also the third that everyone is affected, but not by the same...metric :) Like I said its not...Cosa Nostra. I don't know the metric. It could be even plural You mean like Flambass? Constantly joking about MrConway?:)

Yes I know. Still different conditions could be set forth. Hence my earlier comment.

Thank you. I'm just good at debating:)

Erm.......more than what Weegee does lately? After all, is all about interest..... We don't know that.:) But...to make it clear, I don't think that my stats have anything to do with me being on a "list" or not. Like I said is partly for personal reasons. Also I'm not a gamer, I like ships, navies, history and it took a while until I figured out the game. I mean when I first played dd's I started to escort Bb's left and right, coz....IRL.....and that's how naval tactics and.....you can imagine he outcry from teammates :) Wows has a strong PvP shooter character attached to it which was entirely lost on me. But, again, my stats are mine and I'm entirely responsible for them. I'm not playing the blame game. Oh I play RN Cl's :) I like challenges.

No :) Besides, RNG also can be manipulated:).For example by what data is fed into :). No :) I don't generally approve what Weegee does, but I like this game. We are not discussing theories. We are discussing personal experience. Besides, we can't have all the relevant information. Weegee is a company. Fact Companies are driven by their interests. Fact. Interests dictate certain course of actions. Fact And.....I can go on... But you are mistaken my name is not ...Julian:)

Which also requires a certain metric. Which is different from person to person. And companies are managed by people, so.... Its not a theory. It is personal experience.:) Besides, its not like this is about a ....criminal enterprise or Cosa Nostra :) Which is the very core principle of "designed frustration" :)

And those are the visible ones. Yet.... But you get my point.

:) Game design is all about creating possibilities. Possibilities are a "clean", they are not personal. Evaluating them ( properly) requires objectivity which is again, not personal. I think you are asking the wrong "guy" about that.:) And....the effects could actually go both ways, isn't so?... :)

Erm.....did you hear about "designed frustration" in da gaming? And...did you get your Mckarrow?? :)

Who said anything about a ...."guy"? It could be an automated process or even.... a cycle. What I'm saying is that the possibility exists. And not a too remote one.....

Coz...she is lookin'!!! Edit: Also maybe she is playin' on other servers too....:) Edit2: Not to mention the fun factor when red players get devstriked by a seemingly inferior opponent :)

Meet Dasha!!!

Yes. But we have intent and also means. Besides the possibility. What we don't have is certainty. And we didn't know that gravity existed until formulated as such. We had instead "personal experience".

Which is what I said. However, can denote intention and also means. It certainly doesn't exclude the possibility.

It seems that I can't find it. I think they changed the wording. It was something along the lines of " you will distributed with players who's performance will match yours" and I think it was about brawls. I even recall that there were some posts/threads about it. Anyway, on a side note you could learn some manners, like not to eat when you talk, and also if you engage in a 'discussion" then abstain from reacting to the post which you quote. You know, basic stuff....

These two folks like to act like some kind of neighborhood watch aka "fun police" if you know the type . I think you know what is the way to deal with them :)

That's not what I said. I said isn't neutral .Which means it can be tampered with. In what way and to what end..... Just a sec...

Actually the MM already isn't neutral, By Weegee's own statements, so.....

Yes. I thought that I was the culprit. While this still could be definitively the case, I noticed this in ops as well. And there....let's just say that....is highly unlikely. Maybe the desync got worse, idk. But it is there. Up to the point that affects my aim. Hi Iossi :)

Hi Apollo :) No I will not.. 5v5 at T10 with Cv's?? No thanks

The idea is to make them the moneyz. No more game health, not to mention balance. Balans at its finest...

Oh dat one is also braindead. For different reason tho. I mean..... planes which just spawn inside the targets Aa range ...not coming from somewhere ....lulz..... Apparently Weegee is making a sport out of collecting them...

That's strange.. That's what i consider the main issue, related to .....planes All the other stuff is just the icing on the cake,..... however valid they are..

Could be. I thought that you were ironic :) Well yes. But the problem is ( from a game dev pov) that the DC is the same "object"/action/condition across the board. Its the parameters that are different. So ...

So actually the arguments were perhaps ....just a tiny bit....disingenuous? Nerfing dmg is actually the worst way to balance. Especially in this particular case.