Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Andrewbassg

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    25813
  • Clan

    [OZYR]

Everything posted by Andrewbassg

  1. Andrewbassg

    And ....we have have note from Flambass ....

    If one is recuperating, usually see things from a different ( much healthier) perspective. I don't think that Flambass is dishonest, or ever was. And I posted what he wrote..
  2. Andrewbassg

    And ....we have have note from Flambass ....

    Posted 20 h ago....
  3. Andrewbassg

    People who play PTS, did WG fixed the torpedo bug?

    Really? Nnice... Then it is definitively time to resurrect the weekly update thread. In good faith I stopped doing that after Yabba "said" that it will be probably fixed in 10.7 Yeah metoo. I actually fully diagnosed two bugs for them.... I even gave up on PTS....
  4. Andrewbassg

    People who play PTS, did WG fixed the torpedo bug?

    100% correct. Still, in the last semi official communication on this matter it was stated that 10.7. So.....the question is kinda.... semi legit. i think I have to resume "my" weekly update thread on this matter.....
  5. Andrewbassg

    People who play PTS, did WG fixed the torpedo bug?

    Oh I have no illusions... But dat bug is a game breaking one. Well.....miracles do happen. Sometimes....Tho not really in WeeGeeland....
  6. Andrewbassg

    WG Bought my Soul

    Ahhh.....you legit scared me for a second.....
  7. Andrewbassg

    Does anyone have a friend called RON for sale?

    Well, yes, but,..... they want it all!! And......don't forget the hefty.... khmm..... pardon, fair TM conversion fees. Coz.....
  8. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    This the best rebuke I;ve seen yet of the "answer" numero 2 From the NA forum.
  9. While I don't agree 100% with what he says ( for example people asked for 3v3 modes) it is "interesting" to watch.:) Warning: he is using "colorful" language!! ( to put it mildly) :)
  10. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    Yeah....they are full of it.
  11. Andrewbassg

    What is happening with wows in the last years?

    Unfortunately "he" is called WeeGee. And we can't fire "him". But he is just a greedy po...... That kind will break its neck sooner or later. Or will drown in it's own sh....
  12. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    So...somebody on the NA forum posted (finally!!) the Q&A so even people who don't do Discord ( like me) can see the answers directly. Oh my.......
  13. Yeah...... you are right.... The Väinämöinen class ships had 3900 t displacement and were 93 m long. As comparison the Mogador class dd's had 3000 ( 4000) tons and were 137 m long.... On the other hand we have Petro in the game.....and it floats, so... Oh...... it should be read as Veinemöinen :) I'm HU:). Our language was considered (for a good period) as being very close to the Finnish.
  14. Actually...it could be placed at T6 in a cruiser slot. Like the Graf. Having 10" guns .... it would be fitting.
  15. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    Erm.....no. The thread is mainly about the Q&A, with the accent on the A part. There are many people, who don't necessarily read the discord (me included) Also, as Flamu pointed out the reactions to their answers are disabled. They say that feedback is valuable, so..... I tried to avoid making this thread about Flamu because what one personally feel about him.....is not the scope of this thread. Some people denied ( quite vehemently) the fact that the "torpedo bug" even exist, even after Wg has acknowledged the bug, because it was Flamu who first reported it.Which is....yeah. Because every time they claimed "miscommunication" as the reason for those blunders. They cannot say with a straight face, that there is no communication gap, when idiocies like the Yukon debacle just happened. Just...no. Their answers are soo far off from the reality of this game, their past behaviour and modus operandi, that people just don't know how to react. it is literally unbelievable. More so they have literally zero communication skillz. People value honesty and the truth. Tell the effin truth.
  16. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    My personal recommendation is Calcium oxide (CaO), commonly known as quicklime.
  17. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    Ermm... just nope. While what you are saying is kinda interesting, on its own merit. it isn't the point. I repeat it to you they claim that 12v12 is on what and for what ships are balanced and that's why they won't expand the current rooster with the and for arrival of subs. As an explanation, it is pure and immense BS. The whole wows is based on the concept of "imbalanced balancing" Yes they do. And they do that by insulting us. Sajnalom.
  18. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    You missing the point. It is Wg who is the main act.
  19. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    Lulz. I would say that he would handle both. I mean light years better. And I'm not a groupie.
  20. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    Hmm... you see that's the problem with Tldr's Too many important parts are left out. 5. They are asked if they will increase the number of players per team, given that subs are coming. Their tldr answer is " no, because the current ships are balanced and optimized for this number of players" Yes that is their "answer" .You read that right. This is soo wrong, on soo many levels, that it is beyond belief. Then ofc Flamu proceeds to point out almost all of the reasons why their answer is wrong. Just....as an answer. And then give his answer. But the absolutely ludicrous nature of their answer is just breathtaking. Just as if someone just casually writes down an "answer" on a napkin. And absolutely never ever played the game. The....'problem" is that every single answer what they gave, is like this. Still two things to highlight: popularity is the most important factor in balancing. I mean ships. They literally say that. Yes. And.. 1. They are asked why there is such a communication gap between what Weeegee says ( for example between those who do Q&A's) and what WG "actually does". To which they claim that there is no communication gap. None. Whatsoever. And never was such a thing. Ever. Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing you. I'm just pointing out why it is worth either watching the video or read the Q&A. Edit: Ah I almost forget the feedback ( i.e reactions) are apparently disabled for their answers. Just like if they are fully aware that they are full of it.
  21. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    The problems are 1. It is long, 2, Doing it properly (Q + A + Flamu reaction + my comment on it) It will be even longer. Not to mention the fact that I would gather several bans along the way;) if you are interested you can read it on Discord.. Btw i don't do steams stuff either. Like I said in original is on Discord.
  22. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    If you mean overcritical, then yes. If you mean "Weegee is bad" ,just no. Even after he was booted from being a CC he did give credit to Weegee when it was the case. Just no. The point was about both internal communication and between players and staff. Listen/read the question again.
  23. Andrewbassg

    Hmm..... A ..."Flamu" video out. On the latest Q&A.

    I....recommend watching it unless, someone already read it on the discord. I mean the Q&A. Which I didn't. With the fair warning about Flamu being Flamu. :)
  24. Andrewbassg

    When a Musa run from a Nep

    While strictly technically speaking, it isn't 100% correct, that was the end :): 20210729_162806_PBSC109-Neptune_28_naval_mission.wowsreplay
×