Lootboxer

Too much forward thinking involved for WG to pull.

Agree to most but those torps garbage? LOL Those are the same as on Benson torps, T8 DD, hitting hard and stealthily. Flint is hard to play well, positioning is crucial, using island cover is better then relying on smoke and range can be a big issue on some maps vs T9s but it's not a bigger garbage then most of t7 cruises. MM is terrible for them all.

Think is you don't know who and why did compliment you as it's not instantly visible.

Not really, it's nice of course but besides ofthis it does nothing. Only benefit is that when you have more positive karma, you will have more reports/compliments to spare.

This is a joke, instead of spamming us with more and more broken ship ideas, get the basis right first Lesta. Naval battles are more or less broken since months. @YabbaCoe any chances on getting it fixed some day?

Znowu bitwy morskie mieli i mieli i nic się nie wczytuje. Widac sa inne priorytety niz naprawa tego Strona też laguje.

Already very popular, my fist and only game so far. I fear to think what will it be like when higher tier ships with air drops will come

If you airfield can't notice incoming DD and move (preferably in advance) or just kill it you really deserve to to back to port. And no, DDs are not invisible to CVs (at least those aware of surroundings, minimap, spotted indicators and tactical situation) Only times when DD has killed me in CVs was when game was already lost anyway or when I overextended badly with my hull.

And soon wows will suck too, more by hybrids, air strikes and subs then ru CVs though.

Those CV should be played (if ever) with this song looped

Yes, it's venting system bulid to reduce the number of verbal insults and customer support tickets. Now whatever cr@p happens they will just say: We are sorry but use reporting system in game. TY FY.

But it can't go below zero, so what's the issue? And having 0 yo can still think about all those wasted reports on you and just laugh. Mine is somewhere between 150 and 200 and I don't care much about it TBH.

There is a very long way from 10% to insanity...

Sooner or later it would end in a collab with all stars from pornhub

The thing is even if I have 300 millions and I can buy signals I just want to play game, have fun, not to go for tedious task of shopping. By now income of flags from archivements, containers and other means was enough now I had to reduce usage of signals (for randoms at least.) New players can't even afford signals.

I would like to be able to mount heavy AP on my British CLs.

There are other game breaking ideas incoming nowadays under and above surface of the ocean.

No point in investing valuable skill points into something borderline placebo on majority of ships. Those who can make most of it still need other skills against surface warships more as will see surface combat every game while CV is not guaranteed and even if it will be there may just ignore your flank or you. I can take BFT or/and AFT on some dds but it is mostly for guns not AA.

I don't know if they mess with RNG or MM but they are absolutely capable of doing it and they have patents on this. I assume that they should like steamrolls as it means more resources burned in shorter time for lesser rewards this way encouraging spending irl money to replenish stocks. So why not help a bit by creating imbalanced skill wise teams? Not every game, but every 3rd or 5th? We will never know for sure as proving it would be impossible.

You can still (not for long thought) get better, not nerfable boats at T6 that can do this to Ise:

It's also food for CVs.

Oh, it's so simple, if you'll stay out of range you will not get hit

I nawet można by zniżkę na łajby za golda użyć.

I dunno, I moved on to T6 after WG stole half of my torps