Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Ronchabale

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    10002
  • Clan

    [RODS]

Everything posted by Ronchabale

  1. Ronchabale

    The Smaland Dilemma

    I would like to get the Småland (have been on the ship (museum) several times as it is in my home town) but the 2 million FXP has always seemed too much Think I "payed" 750k FXP for the Missouri so where they came up with the 2000000 FXP for a 1 tier higher DD is beyond insane I have several tier 10 and am working towards both Harugumo and Shima so no.. FXP is of more use elsewhere PS.. Have u considered the Hayate ?
  2. Ronchabale

    Are you buying the new ARP content ?

    I already have all the ships they offer Total waste of money for some different pixel configurations
  3. Ronchabale

    ARP Yamato breaks the premium shop!

    Now that would be something
  4. Ronchabale

    ARP Yamato breaks the premium shop!

    Great but no thanks Since I have the Yamato I am not interested Musashi cammo is nice but no extra gains so I am not spending 6k dubs for some different pixel configuration Yeah.. buy a tier 10.. lol.. Given the potential earnings its a miracle they don´t sell Coal and Steel in the premium shop.. (yet)
  5. Ronchabale

    Suggestion: Show people's commanders in game

    Why not, any info can be good as long as it isn´t in the way But.. Having Lütjens, Kusnetsov or some other commander doesn´t mean much either way as the human behind the controls may be a On the other hand.. Have also seen "naked" ships with stock modules do very well
  6. Paying money for a virtual ship is something you should never do but totally irrelevant if you have lots of money You cant buy coal for money (yet) You can get OP captains Kuznetsov, Lütjens etc. for coal If you have money to spend/waste then saving your coal for commanders makes sense
  7. Have u played it ? Haha, yeah it is Have u played any of these ships ?
  8. So many ships are missing.. Puerto Rico, Missouri, Salem, California, West Virginia, Alabama, Arizona, just naming a few, none of them are exactly "new" This is just one line and I am sure I forgot some ship too Lazy ?
  9. Ronchabale

    No DD on - 43 is to blame (aka Radarhack

    Dunno if the addition of 1 radar cruiser has changed the "fun" with DD:s much
  10. 4 DCP + 4 heals (5+5 with superintendent) 20 sec reload on DCP 80 sec on Repair party
  11. Yeah them mobile coastal batteries (that can sink) are next level
  12. Okt Rev is in no way a weak ship but it has weaknesses If you can work around the issues (stay angled) it aint bad Actually it has a load of armour just about everywhere I would say that the Okt Rev is way more fun to play than Texas (but that is me) Alternatives: Giulio Cesare (unobtainable) Arp ships: (unobtainable) Viribus Unitis: Rubbish, I mean there is more action in watching paint dry (lets see who gets offended )
  13. Ronchabale

    Harbors !!

  14. Ronchabale

    Belfast 43 incoming!

    Value of money is relative to the amount you have, easier to buy and admire your "investment" than fiddling around with some ing 3:rd party website (That is if you have the money to spare and dont give a about WG:s pathetic earnings)
  15. Ronchabale

    Kansas need downtiering

    So its a mobile coastal battery that can be sunk.. Great
  16. Ronchabale

    Santa

    U will have to be very lucky to get any real nice ship in a box, for me the good ships all came in the last boxes when all other "lesser" ships had dropped Same pattern both years I bought a lot of Christmas crates 2018-2019 2019-2020 One exception.. Kamikaze in second batch of ten crates 2018
  17. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    Her ya go..
  18. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    Ok, so why is Ägir, Massachusettes, Lenin, Roma and Gascogne in there ? And not the rest ? Alaska is in there too and Vanguard.. (+ several others that I couldn´t be arsed to include) None of these are silver ships
  19. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    If u took the time to read all the posts in this thread u would see that I have been running the mod for years also u would see what I am getting at To me it doesnt make any sense at all cos if I want to quick and easy compare Armour schemes, AA values, He damage between lets say Lenin, and Masschusettes, Pommern and Puerto Rico I have to find them all in the carousel with filters, so what is "TECH" with the Tech tree ? Yes I can find some ships but not all and yes I can list the specs of ships WG has had time to add to the Tech tree but that is it. Should at least be able to list the ships I have in port
  20. Ronchabale

    Is matchmaking broken?

    MM has been broken forever Skill level differences.. All radars on same team. 3 Mushashis vs 3 of any other tier 9 BB:s All glorious Russian ships on same team.. Etc.
  21. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    That is the one answer that does make sense
  22. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    I pretty much have them all so no worries Still doesn´t explain why some are there and some not Only possible reason is that WG are lazy and the techtree doesn´t make money
  23. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    Well to make it simple, why are Massacusettes, Ägir, Meinz, Lenin, Roma, Gascan, Vanguard (just to name a few) in the unmodded techtree and not Puerto Rico, Missouri, Salem, California, West Virginia, Alabama, Arizona (again just to name a few) I have been using Aslains mod to see the full techtree for a couple of years
  24. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    Wasn´t Texas some reward ? Massa tho ? Ägir, Meinz, Lenin, Roma, Gascan, Vanguard
  25. Ronchabale

    Why dont WG fix the "Techtree"

    There are plenty of ships that disprove that statement, Texas, Massachusettes (But not Alabama)
×