NothingButTheRain

Why not the Dutch 1047 battlecruiser design?

So I asked and one was barely able to complete the first directive while another friend decided to speedboost near the end and barely managed to get the Gorizia, but he was unable to complete the Gorizia mission chain. Mind you, this person is even more experienced with WG games than I am, thought for WoWS he is quite average

This, due to their ability to smoke up more often. I'm grinding Fletcher now and it's kinda doable, but mostly if the enemy carrier can't be bothered to hunt you.

This

I read: EU 154 NA 84 CIS 221 SEA 98

The 2 buttons got moved closer together. I have looked into modding it out myself, but at some point I didn't feel like wanting to bother with this anymore. I found this thread using google.

There are multiple solutions for that though. Or well, potential solutions would be a better way of describing it

I cut out the rest since your reply was rather long and it is rather late. In this game, nobody can do much without good support. This is both a blessing and a curse.

Oh, how sweet. I was mostly just copying your own style of writing, it's not really a hard thing to do. Just holding a mirror in front of you so you can look at yourself. Well, if you say so about the being an average joe at best, I guess you must be rigth about that. The point of a rant is usually to vent. Since your rant was (well, this is what I can make up with you saying this here now) to get me emotional. Or something. It was not really a rant. The thing is however is that I knew your 'rant' was an abssurd one. Something along the same level of /s I've claimed this many times before. And why? because it is true. DD is probably the hardest class to play well (cruiser comes awefully close, if you're a good player of course). Yes, BBs are the easiest class to not potato too hard in. It's just too bad that many of the potatoes prefer to play ships in which they feel more powerful, these being mostly DD and CV. And these people we wouldn't want in the classes that matter the most. But obviously they are not gonna play a class in which they feel more powerless. This is why I think, if only to spread the potatoes more evenly, it would be good for the game if the loss of your DDs at the start of the game should not be synominous to "game over because the other team now has the influence".

Effectively being the operative word here. And at least you can shoot the DM, but it is unwise to challenge a DM to a duel with a DD most of the times.

EA killed so many good games out there.

Only for as long as the relevant armor thickness isn't added into the game at which point 510mm can overmatch where 4600mm cannot. Btw, I wonder if these ships will get a different gunsound or if they will just get the standard Yamato-esk gunsound?

Can't even torp or shoot that camping Stalingrad from outside his maximum radar range with my Fletcher

If this happens to be a carrier main, it is not unthiunkable this is an alt account meant to be timed to play against the real account so the player (who controls both these accounts) can boost his winrate and have an easier time farming the reds.

No. The DDegenerates just need to git gud instead of cryharding and not throw games because they get matchmaking they don't like, as is the reason this thread was created in the first place. Yes, you won't like it but it's true. This thread was really created to complain about the DDs that actively go kill themselves even beforte the so called bbabboons managed to even get to full speed. Your rant sounds more like a typical DDegenerate blaming his own potatoness on the entire team and his pizzadelileryboy and his mother's cat. hey look, I can make certain parts of my sentences bold as well! And I can think of catchy phrases too! And don't forget about tier 10 carriers being able to dumpster whoever they want. Yes, this sounds like an awesome idea.

I already answered your 3rd question,. You're just calling it impressive how I keep trying to dodge your questions because of your misplaced sense of entitlement. You haven't even bothered to respond to my answer to 1/3rd of your questions, nor have you responded to calling me dumb while you yourself were the one being dumb, nor have you given me any apology for insulting me multiple times now. And if you want to know about the stats of the lower tier ships, perhaps you should look up when I actually played them. Here's a hint: Anyway, since I don't like being insulted multiple times, off to my blacklist you go after I reported your posts.

I would like the stats also mentioning the percentages of damage I done to all ships in addition to the standard total damage numbers, I vote in favor

Maybe you would want to rephrase this here first instead of trying to hit me with your puny insults. And to call you out on another compehentional mistake of yours, I wasn't the one calling it 'extremely well thought out' ideas, it was that elitist DD main that created the term. Or maybe you need to use more bolded text next time you reply to me, just maybe you will then impress me.

Repost: You are just an elitist DD main who doesn't want his precious OP toyz nurfed! O gosh... This at least explains why you come with ridiculous suggestions to nerf the 2 ship classes that you already perform worse in. Yes, so much logic hidden within your comments. But I guess this is just your own personal logic. Again: How about you first try any of the 2 other classes before complaining about them? You never play them anyway.

I'm not sure why you are calling me dumb when I have in fact answered one of your questions. Looks like you're the one being dumb, but whatever.

But isn't there literally tons of people saying all kinds of stuff like "Me no like! Wallet closed!" etc? I always seen this as a bit whiney and a bit ridiculous. If someone doesn't want to pay, then that's fine with me. But it's comments I typically scroll through. Now otoh I do like to be able to make an informed decision about what I do and what I spend my money on and in this regard I would not like to get purposefully mislead by whoever at all.

Because the CL gets outtraded by the DD directly when the CL is supposed to be the DDs counter. This in itself is already ridiculous. No, if a DD gets too close to his main counter, he should be the one getting deleted instead.

Might as well argue that all classes are harder to play now and that it gets exponentially harder on higher tiers. I know it's not impossible, even in a Fletcher. These nerfs did make much of a difference in high tiers. Wooster used to be able to click radar whenever it got spotted and the CE nerf effectively removed that aspect from the game, just to name something. You wanna talk OP? Then how about DDs outright deleting CLs ina 1v1 fight. How ridiculous is that? But this is how powerful DDs have now become. Sure, go ahead and claim that BBs and CAs need to be nerfed and DDs need to get buffed. But it will only show that you haven't thought it out as 'extremly well' as I have. But at least you get cracked up because of this. No, it really shouldn't. My extremely well thought out idea about limiting the influence of the class that has the most influence of all surface combatants cannot as easily be copypastaad to the 2 other classes that already have less influence. I am not sure why this would be sucha good idea in the first place, but it is up to you to support your own stances anyway, so go ahead if you care enough to elaborate on this stance of yours. EDIT Well now how interesting this is. You play exclusively DD, that's why you prefer DDs to not get nerfed, but other ships to get nerfed instead. But your stats wouldn't be as purple if you actually bothered to play the other classes. Maybe try playing the other classes first before stating stuff you have no 1st hand knowledge with.

I would btw like to point out another factor. It is relatively minor, but imo should be taken into account here as well. Since DefAA has been made kinda useless, more people are taking hydro. This is also to the detriment of DD players and mainly the ones that rely more on their torps. Let alone that bad overall AA means that enemy carriers need not fear scouting around and getting their planes deleted instantly when approaching too close to a Mino or an Atlanta (ha! remember those days? Those are long gone now, suhc a pitty). So DDs get spotted earlier and easier, as carrier planes need not fear overextending with their planes. Buffing DefAA could therefore be an indirect buff to DDs (and particularly the torpers).

I'm unsure as to how proceed with making teamplay for DDs more rewarding, if only because I fail to see the full picture here. We can blame WG for being not transparant enough about this issue.