NothingButTheRain

Would take wayyyy too long to get a 26pt captain so I'd rather they reduce the cost of secondary builds or find some other solution instead.

At least now you sound kinda annoyed.

These ships came with an event permacamo.

Time for you to go to bed, you're just too tired to play well anymore

Like I've said before, I only like Mountain Range when playing DD without there being a CV present. I don't play only DD btw.

Before my above coal crates (screenshot from yesterday). Now So for me the calculations were correct. And as a sidenote, the 1st crate of the day I completed my final dailycrate-able collection so I also got some extra credits

There's always a piece of personal preference indeed I do like north and not just because of cb but because of the diverse gameplay this map offers me and I got so many options with whatever ship I play. There's plenty of islands so a push can be obscured so I don't get focussed and it offers opportunities for ambushes

So I have this habit of using a daily container as a blocker to prevent me from accidentally activating a day of premium, but since it was a resource container containing coal my idea was to open it, get the coal and replace it with a TYL crate which typically doesn't contain any coal. and then the TYL container So I got trolled by WG, but in a good way Cheers Wargaming!

This is why the tier 4 carriers also need to get nerfed

Even if the DD there dies, there's terrain which can be used to cover your retreat. If this happens on A cap in Mountain Range, you're basically toast.

Yes, even though their AA is nothing to speak off. Only some of the high tier russian DDs (and a single lost murican prem DD) have decent AA now, afaicu. Though otoh, might say that the brit DDs are (now that AA is basically an almost useless stat anyway) are the least bad ones with a CV meta

I had great fun grinding my Fletcher during the last couple months or so, almost unicum levels even. Took me a long while to figure Fletcher out but at some point it just clicked and I was more often #1 in my team then I was not the #1 in my team (yes I screenshotted all the end results). This includes solo battles. Carriers were not much of an issue to me. They start to get really nasty once either there is more then 2 of them or there's 1 carrier each team but also just 1 or maybe 2 DDs.

ehh...ok it is time for me to slowly back out of this now kinda awkward getting conversation, cya later

How is Blyskavyska in narai btw?

I've had 2 (yes two!) KGVs do this ina single game. They were farming kills for a mission.

Don't forget about the 12km radar

The corridor maps in WoT are designed to be not static but brawling maps. Camping is not rewarded in WoT as the maps are purposefully designed to offer very few longer lines of fire. Personally I like North, especially in cb it's a map for everyone offering various tactics.

Fault Line is one of the better maps out there. Most maps are bad to rush the middle in the beginning of the match and fault line (being a lower tier map) teaches new players to avoid rushing through the middle, just to name one thing. After the start of the match Fault Line becomes very dynamic and knowing WHEN to push is key on this map. I admit that thinking strategically is not everyone's cup of tea. Knowing when to push is perhaps the hardest skill to master in wows. Want a bad map? try Mountain Range. This map is bad with anything that isn't a DD unless there's a CV.

Yes but you don't gamble everything you own, only your life! (and perhaps the stuff you then have on you so others can loot your corpse)

Only the assets you gambled with, but not everying you own

Lol, I typed this in another topic the same time you typed your message here

So is this why WG is doing this? I wouldn't even be surprised anymore by this. I mean it's really not that difficult to revert the tier 4 carrier buffs but WG seems to be too allergic to do so or something. Otherwise I could think it's some measure to limit the kamikazes from being used to club instead but beyond these ideas I could concoct, I have no idea why WG chooses to do this. Because this is WG choosing to do this and I don't understand why from a gamer's PoV. Or maybe it's some weird roleplaying thing. I've seen those odd suggestions in other games before and it would be kinda shady and odd if it were true Or perhaps it is some experiment and they are collecting data. Or it is to the amusement of some really high-up-there WG chief who wanted this to happen for whatever reason.

It would be better for everyone if they could club some bots in operations instead.

I think WG should sinply nerf these carriers so people won't even want to club in them anymore, seeing a hard limit of 1 was problematic for them. The only advantage I see in this is less people clubbing in their kamikazes but I'm literally not sure this tradeoff with the carriers now is better or worse.

Elaborate?