NothingButTheRain

No, I didn't mention players who make some mistake or play dumb and go toxic and won't learn anything. I did mentioned elitist unicorns who give advice to n00bs that obviously could use some advice, that is in essence correct, but given to the 'pupil' in a toxic way, which is why it won't work.

Fine, I'll refrase it for you to "more OP then the other classes, your stats prove this".

It would appear that we agree

In case of DDs, one 'could' add that in reality, most DDs didn't rearm all their torps in a minute or 2. And most couldn't cloak at a distance of 5km I do agree that, when comparing real damage to the ingame damage, perhaps the DWTs resemble reality a bit closer...except I'm unsure what the IRL detection range of torps would be. But then again, steering in WoWS also isn't as it was in reality. So many things to consider...

True, BUT knowledge or knowing better by itself will be relatively meaningless if the teacher doesn't know how to teach. Enter the so called unicorn elitists, of which I've had to engage a couple of times Some will respond by going into toxic mode, which often will simply not help whatsoever. Especially while the match is still being played, it will often result in that player perfroming even worse as the teacher would merely be distracting him. He can't absorb it anyway so why even try? I've seen it on the forums as well (though thankfully not as often), it won't teach anything if you don't know how to. But imo teaching what you know to someone else is a whole other skill in itself.

It is enjoyable

Looks like he has. link: https://wows-numbers.com/player/charts/504700981,aboomination/ Mine isn't 50% right from the start, but actually not that far off. I also kinda agree that it's not actually that hard to get a winrate of 50% or higher right from the start, provided you know how to make the right decisions at the right moment. Mine was even above 53% in WoT, right from the start. Knowing when to do what is at least as important as knowing how to hit the red stuff

This is what I do. Just report the guy and add him to your blacklist and be done with it and continu enjoying the game In the end these people are just a waste of time trying to have a dialog with, they will never change their minds but will try and make yours miserable by texting you with insults lol.

Broke my personal best of credit gain with Musashi, after having played a 1m game with Missouri the previous match. Had 6 kill as well, 2 of which were DDs These new signals are just what I needed And thanks to the friendly Seattle who ended up guarding me from enemy planes for the entire duration of the match

Dude, I'm not on trial here It's actually you who prefers to angrycloud talk to me, are you really believing yourself here? I mentioned your stats as it shows why you want to argue that CVs are not overpowered as a class and prefer to attack me as a person instead (the collateral damage I mentioned earlier). Or is this just some lame joke of yours? CVs are overpowered. They are gonna get changed. They will (hopefully) be less powerful and hopefully be less frustrating to a majority of players. No, being toxic on this forum won't save your ... whatever it is you're trying to save here. Anyway, anyone could cut parts from your posts and pull them out of context. Other then that, I don't know what your problem is, but I don't really care. Go behave toxic towards someone else. Have a nice day.

I'm also waiting on JB. The thing is that I REALLY liked my Richelieu grind! I have both Yamato and Musashi and I do see what you mean with the credit income. But I do get more credits from Musashi then from Yamato, but I think this is to do with the fact that I use that free HSF camo for my Yamato (the one with the blue stripes) and that one is missing +20% credit income boost. It wouldn't surprise me if Yamato with the 5000 doubloons camo is about as good a credit maker as Musashi, but it would cost 5000 doubloons on top of that. I was wondering about Salem, but if it's really such a great credit farmer, I might opt to get Salem as well. But first I will patiently wait to see what happenes next

I just completed the Dunkirk collection for the captain that will end up on my Conq, which I'm very close to unlocking! Only thing I need is credits I had forgotten that this collection gives 2 items each crate, 10 crates was juuuust about enough to get the 10 items I still needed, with no duplicates to spare. I think this feature is very nice! They didn't add all the collections, but I know several people who were permitted to finish these collections at last

This is basically what I try to go for. At very long range doesn't make a lot of sense. You'll usually get spotted, shot at and will need to evade (which means you'll arrive at your destination with quite a bit of delay) while doing a lot less damage and having a lot less influence for your team, because you spend more time traversing the map.

Oh, nice I have 1.4m fxp atm, but I'm missing Kronstadt and Nelson and I kinda might want to skip Seattle so I can finally get Wooster All is well, have a nice day

And I heard what you said, no need to keep repeating it. You'll never be right no matter how hard you try your best to spin it. Carriers ARE overpowered, your own stats prove this. You even cut away the part where I mentioned the name of this thread and you do it simply because it doesn't suit you. Here it is again: I am talking about this. While you are talking about me. Please can that crap, I don't enjoy your personal attacks and I don't enjoy your unwillingness to participate in a constructive way. Instead of accusing me for the 2 lost games above (which wasn't my point anyway), accuse yourself for being arrogant and not want to lose your OP clubbing ships (but you keep your Clemson). You don't care about me. All you care about is the ships in this list: and I don't want to be your collateral damage just because of your personal problems with the changing of the ships in this list. I don't deserve your flak anyway. If you have to be destructive, I'll just end up adding you to my ignore list.

I was talking about about how carriers are not good for the game. Yes I'm serious.

Not Alaska?

Again, this is where you're wrong. See this part? He wasn't talking about me

I think a portion is not actually the Alaska being supposedly UP, but that many of the tech tree tier 9 ships are simply kinda bad.

Yes and this is why the Saipan BY FAR has most of the plane kills? You try to blame it on whoever doesn't agree with you, your own stats prove how OP carriers really are. I'm actually offended by your tenacity as you desperately try to try to convince the general populace of this forum that carriers are in fact not OP and that in both games I was actually the lead cause of the losses. There's hardly anyone who will take your stance seriously, especially WG won't. I'm pretty sure you'd love to be able to fully ignore your own stats of a thousand played battles and prove that the doubts you can cast on the 2 battles I provided are somehow of greater importance. But the truth is that you're fine with carriers being OP and you simply don't want to see this changed. And you don't seem to care about the collateral damage you may cause (like how you're attacking me for supposedly being the cause of those 2 lost games). You selectively ignore proof but seem to love to rip other 'proof' out of context, just so you can make your point more valid in some twisted way. Carriers are OP and they need to go, it's as simple as that. They are infuriating and are a bad influence on the game. Most people probably don't even like carriers in their game, even if theirs is the better player. They need to go and no amount of screenshotpainting you do will change this. I'm not sure how seriously I should take you, it's kinda obvious you're far from unbiased (even though you try to imply you're not unbiased). CVs are gonna get a rework and I hope they will change for the better

wow... The very most I managed to get hold of was 136 of the revolutionary camos. The shark/eagle camos I think I gotten like 60 in total? No way I got 500 of those camos, that's totally awesome!

I noticed recently that the amount of camos seemed to decline, and I've only played this game for a year and a bit. How many camos were people managing to collect back then? And if the rewards keep declining and I find this game less enjoyable, I'll just leave (along with leaving all of my 'assets') just like I left my WoT assets. In the end it's about the amount of fun I can have and having to wait for an opportunity instead of being able to play all fun scenario battles (many of which have been nerfed and became more frustrating and less rewarding to play) and having to do a LOT of grinding for a meager reward. At some point I'll just leave. Shame really, I really like this game. But I'll find other game, just like I at one time found WoWS

Don't get me wrong, I'd probably enjoy the RTS gameplay of carriers more then the arcade style, but battles like these are a wakeup call and remind me why this must be changed. I'm sure gonna miss playing Ryujo in scenarios, but I believe it's for the best of the game.

Objectively judging the stats clearly shows how OP carriers truely are and why they must be changed. These 2 battles I had in 2 days merely illustrate my point. You're not taking into account stuff that is in the disadvantage of carrier gameplay. This was kinda within 24 hours of each other. How is your take on CV OPness objective judging? Frankly, I think you're overreacting. And I don't know what your neptune story has to do with any of this. Even your own stats show how OP carriers are and you keep pointing at me.

Warship Tier Nation Battles Win rate PR Average Damage Avg. frags Avg. planes destroyed Zuiho 5 Japan 1 527 79.37% 2 506 66 571 2.37 21.49 Details Yes, I do know it sometimes happens. In your case it happens 20.63% of all your battles at the most (or you get a better tier 5 CV in your other team perhaps).