NothingButTheRain

It was a fakeboote right from the start. But good thing WG is actually catching up to adding ships like these (still waiting on the USS Blue and the USS Conway ).

It may be better to not use existing names for paper ships. Your way would mean the real Moltke couldn't be added to the game anymore, or at least not using her original name and I'd prefer Moltke on the WW1 ship.

I don't have the B derpitz, but thanks for the headsup anyway. And why hide your stats? I can even remember having seen you ingame on multiple occasions. People will think you're a troll with just the few posts you made

well...if you want to continu down this path, i don't really feel like bothering with this crap anynore. You're being ridiculous again. it goes nowhere. you meant to say this here right? and of course the proof that you are demanding of me should be non-existent, which obviously would prove me wrong. How about you just take a look at stalingrad stats instead since these stats are objectively more significant to your lone example you seem to want to prioritise so much, which is absurd. It's just another smoke screen for me to blow away till some other stalingrad apologist lays another smokescreen. Just to keep attention away from the actual issue here. Nice.

Part of the historical region of Friesland is actually part of germany, but it's called Ost-Friesland (eastern Friesland) and Nord-Friesland (Northern Friesland), part of the latter is in the southernmost part of Jutland. Often the Dutch Friesland is called West-Friesland, but there already exists a region which in The Netherlands is West-Friesland, now part of Northern Holland. Sometimes even Helgoland used to be considered part of the historical region of Friesland. But otoh, one could consider Friesland to be part of Germany when it occupied The Netherlands during WW2.

You know... At first I thought you were wrong, but you may be right actually (may). And I totally agree with an option to disable the automated spam, even though the "I'm using hydro!" messages typically aren't as toxic as the written messages, regardless of weekend or not

But it is what you were implying. Either that or you're saying I'm so totally dumb that I don't know how to angle. And many stalingrad apologists are doing this, I'm surprised this hadn't gotten noticed by you before. Oh yes, DM absolutely annihilates stalingrad, therefore stalingrad cannot be OP. But it is. It's just that the typical stalingrad apologists simply refuse to even acqknowledge this, let anone take anyone who complains about stalingrad seriously because it is easier to ridicule someone who complains than it is to admit he is wrong.

So you think I'm lying when I say stalingrad is OP? Or when my clanmates tell about their stalingrads? Well, if that's the way you prefer to communicate, I guess that's just the way you are.

I don't think WG will be falling for this old trick anymore. Or at least I hope not.

And at what ranges can stalingrad citadel wooster? And at what angles? Or how about stalingrad vs a moskva?

2 of my clanmates are and both of them say that stalingrad is broken. That's personal experience right? And both of them are not the example elitists protecting their premium toys. One even had 4 kills and top spot in a win battle in his first game ever in stalingrad. The other one played a mere couple battles in his stalingrad and it's already better average damage THAN ALL HIS TIER 10 BATTLESHIPS. Are you saying stalingrad is totally fine? because it's clearly not. And I'm kinda done trying to show others who CHOOSE TO STAY BLIND ffs. This BS argument about "You don't own a stalingrad so I'll tell you in a very socially accepted way to STFU" also doesn't go anymore.

And you are talking about people who include the apologists who want nothing but to apose their favorite OP premiums not getting nerfed, regardless of how much collateral damage this causes to the game and its community. I'm not sure how it doesn't matter to me. Like I explained, the platform the radar is mounted on also matters. And about this group that sais they can't kill a stalingrad...well..I dunno what planet that group is coming from but any ship in the game can be sunk? I mean, that's the most basic of mechanics in this game and since you state you're very experience dwith the game we both know this isn't the reason why you are even mentioning this. It's ridiculous to even bring this forward in what is supposed to be not a beginner thread.

They just switch radarship to radarship and permaspot you. And the problem with Stalingrad is not only the radar but also the platform this radar is mounted on.

Well you're wrong about being angled vs a stalingrad being effective at mitigating its guns. Just had a battle in Moskva and he sure could citadel me while I was angled, but I couldn't citadel him back while he was braodside. Was long range but still. And yes I fought a broadside stalingrad in cb the other day in wooster and no I couldn't citadel him. This stalingrad is total BS and WG should remove it from the game. It's a game of "haves vs the have-nots" now and it's as bad a gaming experience as the carrier overpopulation now (especially when playing Mogami). You sure turning into a stalingrad-apologist. You really believe I don't know how the angling mechanic in this game works?

I'm actually kinda wondering when this is gonna be announced

This is what I am faced with when facing a clan fielding at least one of these things. In 1 battle the stalingrad simply camped here: and we couldn't get rid of it. And at some point I caught a stalingrad broadside, but will have to run the replay to get useable screenshots. But suffice to say that I was not able to punish the broadside stalingrad but he sure could punish me. This Stalingrad is one of the most retardproof 'cruisers' in the game. When spotted, you just have to think where the enemy will be (which is very easy in CB) and pot radar along with some of the other radar ships to be almost permaspotted due to this radar. ALL otehr ships cant radar it back and you can't even get near the stalingrad. It's insane radar range (WHICH IS UNMATCHED BY ANY OTHER SHIPS IN THE FRIGGIN GAME) along with the duration of it, the whole ship together, make CB totally unfun for me to play. WG should DELETE that *edit* from the gamefiles and gift all owners 28k steel back, THERE, FIXED!!!!

Dude, you are talking to someone who actually knows the basics of angling

I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE ABSURD RANGE OF THAT RADAR ALONG WITH ITS STUPID RADARDURATION!!!

Which are all inferior to Stalingrad anyway

Hiding is not an issue when playing a ship trat is basically an improved Moskva and Moskva sure doesn't have issues with it's Stalingrad-like conceilment Is that all you had to say? it's conceilment?

Those are all open water cruisers. And Stalingrad can easily wreck these ships back, not? I was talking about Stalingrad overrunning a position, not oberruning open water (even though even in that situation it is easy mode).

I don't think a premium ship for LOADS of credits will ever become a real thing, but how about a (otherwise completely useless and 100% visuals only) special flag with a HUUUGE $ sign on it with lots of diamonds and on it the word "RICH!" or something, make it cost 200m credits and maybe even make more expensive ones, just so you can show how ludicrous your creditpile is Could even give this flag a 1% extra credit income bonus or something. It will actually become wanted despite how semi-useless it is.

Apparently being @El2aZeR's waifu requires being a real enterprise

They are a leftover from 2 years ago. I used to pick them back when I was still a free player and needed the credits above all else, along with some of the other goodies that used to be in those crates. But honestly, I don't know for sure who would benefit from these crates.

Stalingrad with its absurd radar is just click to activate radar, shoot the red stuff and "Oh look I did 20k damage again, I am so skilled! ". The ultimate 'cruiser' for plebs, you just nose in, pop radar and blap some red crap, yes it really requires so much skill and rng, it's totally unworkable. Stalingrad doesn't care about bad rudder shift or conceilment similar to Moskva (which is not as good as Stalingrad) and doesn't care about not having hydro. It has insane radar, it can spot and railgun red DDs out of the water and will know where the torps will be coming from. It can blap Yamato weakspot without the Yamato being able to do the same in return because of the nose and because Stalingrad laughs at Yamato accuracy. And don't start with Yamato LM, Stalingrad accuracy LM comes stock with the ship. And what HE spammer will hurt you? Stalingrad can just rush in and overrun the HE spammer and the HE spammer can't even run away due to Stalingrad speed and you can forget about getting undetected because oh yes, radar! And now comes the BB variant on the horizon, yes absolutely great stuff! (not) I remember how Stalingrad balancing department handled the Stalingrad. They put out several test versions, one of which included an AP-only variant which in turn got improved shell characteristics and after all test iterations had been through extensive testing, roughly a day before it went final the balancing department decided to overbuff basically everything on this ship and finalise it without even asking themselves or the testers what they thought of this final design before sending it out the door. Stalingrad is one of the most retardproof ships ever and the new BB will even piss on everything else. Who in their right minds decided it was a good idea to create a ship like Slava? I have absolutely no trust in WG balancingdepartment as WG squandered this trust when they decided to ninjabuff Stalingrad at the last second without anyone being able to secondguess the final changes before it was send to live. It's absurd.