Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

veslingr

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    477

Everything posted by veslingr

  1. veslingr

    PEF........ I want my money back

    @almost 8 k games and full yellow stats....yeah....it is not a problem in ships...or you can delude yourself and blame everything else for your failure.
  2. veslingr

    PEF........ I want my money back

    somehow when i see his stats after 7 k games it looks like all ships are crap for him :)
  3. why do you cry....dont buy it....steel one way or other should never ever been on premium shop....and now that WG [edited]it and gave it you want it to be cheep...you know you can earn it for free thrue the game you lazy *edit
  4. by your number of games you should know DMG means crap in this game...you can burn Conqueror for 200 k dmg (and he lives) and been worst player in team. On other hand other guy can have 40k and been much more useful than you (lets say he did 40k do DDS). PR is directly tied to DMG so it can be epic misleading. yeah in 10 games you can have bad luck and been on 20%wr but n long run it will eaven..and if you in 1000 games have 50% WR than it is not luck, but you do little for team, and if you in next 1000 batles you have 55% wr you are improving
  5. well there is only one goal to this game and it is TO WIN.....everything else you dooing is to win..you spot to win, you do dmg to win, you cap to win.....so winrate is ultimate goal. does it have flaws? sure. does base exp has flaws? sure it does...it is eaven easier to grind PR or base exp than WR (DMG been crucial factor for PW and EXP)......grinding base exp in many ways can be dooing bad stuff for your team to win...like snipe from long range just to do dmg. didnt ranked show us that top XP does not mean best player for team?
  6. Why winrate? SO top clans recruit you, so you can compare yourself to others, so you can see how your skill improves, so you can compare different ships....
  7. It is no matter of rekt or no rekt but ships stats. Hp, armor, gunheandling, armorpenetration and so on. Any ship in which casual player scores his aboweaverage resault is strong ship. S is Kronstad on stereoids and K is a great ship
  8. No idea what did you post but this is not server stats of a ship
  9. veslingr

    Is there any point to the Bismarck?

    Basically you confirmed that B is at bottom. and have 4x2 turets, so can use only 50% guns in tank mode while FR can tank better wich is only ship that has someething worst than B...every other ship is better + has some nice "gimmic" like super heal (Vanguard) or very solid stealth+much stronger balistic (Roma). B is by all practical stats in top 3 worst BBs on t8.....Gascone + Massa having some glaring weakness too
  10. veslingr

    Is there any point to the Bismarck?

    he has worst gun in t8 BBs bracket. Low aplha, low caliber, bad dispersion She was tough ship 1,5 year ago, now everybody knows it eats 15k salvos if you aim a little bit higher and o not try to citadel it they can be halpfull but secondary spec is fun spec but not competitive.....after fire nerf of secondaries and their low caliber they are extremely situational and much more fun that effective. Bis/Tir are extremely fun ships but almost every other BBs is better than them
  11. veslingr

    Console Ready CV's....We all told you so ;-)

    Sadly complex "harder" games are for much smaller number of players, every attempt to "easy" the game and to make it more "user friendly" or to use right word "dumbed down" is forced by small playerbase. We had game but we did not have players translating WG did not have money, now we have half-product thats attracks more players and will continue so while it is on path of dumbing it down and attracting players who "grow up" on FB and arcade games. As we agree that this game exist for earning money and not because naval entusiast gather to create best naval game, WG is going for money (money=player base) and most of their decisions we dont like is driven by that idea - increase playerbase/earn more money CVs as class got fucked up and as much as I/we hate it it is for benefit of game (console adjustment) in long run. Wows in its "original" state did not appeal larg player base and that it major problem for WG and in the end for us who wold like to continue playing this game.
  12. veslingr

    Console Ready CV's....We all told you so ;-)

    I agree with you 100% BUT one thing i dont get how you did not get in your analysis. it is easy - NO MONEY NO GAME. WOWs does not have sustained profitability as it lacks massiveness like WOT. They basicly live or die by couple of thousands of players who will come or go in next month/year period. Profitable desktop games do not need console (do you play WOW on console?). to sumerize it, WOWP has 2 paths....consoled dumbed down play, arcade style or death in mid term. WOWp is dead WOWS is alive but with grim future if player base dont d WOT is moneymaker stil but with obvious decline of player base
  13. Why are you against bots? BOts play better than 50% of human players
  14. veslingr

    ST: CE change - interesting?

    Worch and chapy can not stealth radar. Not from this patch
  15. veslingr

    Royal Navy event craps on casual players

    i give them high five for putting at least some standards...it seam everybody wont to log in 1 time per month and get ALL rewards.....no you wont..go love your self and get back to wot...oki?
  16. veslingr

    Conqureror

    Yes. Cl
  17. veslingr

    Lets talk Republique... The French Tier X BB

    top 50%, 25, 10 and 5% playerss in t10 BBs have the best results in her and its their best WR/PR ship...so i know you dont want to hear it...but it is you not the ship
  18. veslingr

    Conqureror

    why Jack Dunkirk on Cnoq ffs? it is RN DD, CA captain?
  19. veslingr

    Conqureror

    it all stands...but you can gain WR eaven if AFK in battle......for PR you need to work....you will get 0 kills from 25 km, and dmg will be low (for that ship): both WR and PR can be grinned, but problem is that WR others (3 man division) can grind for you, while for your PR you must work alone and nobody can give you dmg or kills. nobody says high PR low WR guy is super player with bad luck, it can be smart grinder of PR that contributes to victory 0 points. but still DMG farming as grinding requires some kind of skill cause you compete with performance of other players in that "yours" ship, if everybody grinds fire dmg in Conqueror (as they do) trashold for average dmg for that ship is high and you need to work harder then them or your increment dmg compared to rest.
  20. veslingr

    Conqureror

    well yeah, it is combination. our captain i was referring is yellow thru all line in both PR and WR (t9 and t 10) so my conclusion was that it was him and not the ship
  21. veslingr

    Conqureror

    yeah, but trashold for Conqueror dmg is much higher than other BBs. expected values of BBs from wows stats Conq: - 103788.23623011 Yama - 83026.931972789 so higher expected dmg in incorporated in PR of Conqueeror than other ships to have same result in PR in yamato you need 83 k dmg while in Conq you need 103 k. so it can be farmed, but much harder than lets say WR in Saipan, flint , flint setup so you have high WR player with 5 k games where 2,5 are in this setup :). i see where you going with WR, but WR is in my opinion, easier to farm....in 3 man division 2 can carry idiot to 55% wr :)
  22. veslingr

    Conqureror

    PR is calculated as "your performance" vs "average server performance".....so if you are yellow you do worst than average of other players and if you are green or over you are equal or better than average. so when PR is calculated it is calculated how you compare against other captains, who have same "problems as you" aka MM, teams over long run. WR is other story, but PR is as good as it gets to your personal peerformance
×