-
Content Сount
2,975 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
477
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by veslingr
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
Ok mate, we can go that road...you lough my bad English i will yours tomato stats in wows..deal?- 97 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well not true. Good captain know weaknesses of its ships and use team to help him....If Ashik stick with 2 other BBS or with AAA cruiser, or communicate with his own CV for airp rotectiion his chances will rise
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
every day- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
exactly my point
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
aaaa spelling police...good good....- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
no idea what is the point here but i agree :)- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Objective is clear..peoples just potato and free exp thrue tiers....2 days ago i was in play with Henry who constantly whined in chad that he "must learn this ship"....when i asked what he was dooing thrue tiers 3-4-5-6-7-8-9 where FR cruisers have similar play style he had no good answer
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
waist of good steel- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Stalingrad 60 Seconds Fire Duration
veslingr replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
Stalin is OP ship....7 second longer fire will do nothing to change that- 97 replies
-
- stalingrad
- kronshtadt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
yeah...we will need "i win button" aka teamplay
-
Blyskawica - WG says it can't buff it because of "stats".
veslingr replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
Fair answer.....yes from your point of view Lenin is better and more fun ship...Bly got powercreeped abit. her main advantaga in old days was she had ability to stealthfire with "stock" captain. Removing stealthfire her low DPM hinders her alot -
whats wrong with normandie? I have 67k average dmg in it?
-
Blyskawica - WG says it can't buff it because of "stats".
veslingr replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
so fun = easy to use -
there are no bad ship just bad captains
-
Dunq = mastercard PEF = free
-
yeah, but it is very easy to check out ingame if this is my account or not
-
https://wows-numbers.com/player/503182571,Drvosjeca_Adler/ me
-
But that is ultimate truth, majority of peoples just can not play Batlecruisers (translating in lower average stats). They will not perform if you play it like BBs, and most of peoples play it like that and have bad results. And most of peoples will not admit it is their fault but - ship sucks. If you play Minotaur as Zao you will fail miserably, and if you play Zao as DM you will fail....no matter they all are in cruiser slot
-
Yes Dunq is much better ship than PEF, no question asked. Only thing PEF has over Dunq is that it is free :)
-
There is no T6 BBS that can fire all guns and hide citadel, except Dunq You can not citadel Dunq while in natural position Dreadnoughts have no speed to disengage that easily as Dunq, combined speed + stealth it is one of easiest BBs to disengage. I think rest of your post is pure LTP case, you base your statement that Dunq is bad ship because you have 40% wr in it
-
Bart and Burg, same as Dunq have low caliber guns that can not over match any bbs in their tier and are forced to use good position to do DMG. NM and Montana except number of guns have nothing in common in gameplay While Dunq and those 2 premiums have exaclty same gampelay, flanking BBS becasue they lack penetration to fight properly angled ships, on t 10 many cruisers will bounce 380 if angled correctly....so Bart, Burg and Dunq play the same - position over guns strenght. i dont know who is more or less inclined towards premium account but as soon as it is not looking towards basic XP and is taking modifiers into account we are in problem
-
i mean she does not need to show broadside to fire all guns. No other BBs can do that, yes you can angle but in one point you show broadside 10 seconds every 30 seconds. In fact this ship is hardest to devastate - devastate means taking 50%+ health in one salvo. And nobody will do that. It can burn and will eat high IFHE dmg, but will not get 20k salvo and in tank build burning BBs takes alot of time and focusfire from couple of ships. It is mobile it has OK stealth rating so it can disengage much easier than dreadnoughts. We can talk what is purpose of BBS.....i would say BBs main role is to push cruisers away from cap and Batlecruisers does that very very good. In fact they were build fot fighting cruisers and not other BBs. There is no hole in my argument, i stated this ship is solid DPS ship when played right. and in 100 games you eliminate luck (bad or good). Also do you know your highest playing ship has 200 battles and only 4 are in 100+ bracket?
-
Taking XP as indicator is always bad because premium account and flags are taken into account....and this stats shows what i am point - peoples just dont know how to play Battlecruisers. It is very bad ship if you want premium BBs. But if you want to prepare yourself for Jan Bart and/or Burgone it is perfect ship
-
100 battles is solid personal sample where good and bad strikes are evened. , and again you display common mistake in evaluating BBs - DPM and pen value totally forget about speed, and in this case tankines of ship and ability to have 100% time 100% uptime on guns.. In Dunq you will never open your side and risk devastation and you will have 100% DPM uptime.....no other BBS on t6 can have 100% DPM up time and be "safe" from devastation. So theoretically most of other BBs on t 6 have higher DPM but in battle then can use 66% of their DPM most of time or even less. Dunq and PEF have alot in common, they in fact are not BBs and if you do not play them as BBs they will yield resault
-
you wanna tell me now that even Dunq is bad ship? That ship is DMG machine....i just think many peoples do not how to play BBs if he is not "classic" bbs which means angle 30% and over match opponent
