veslingr

Yes you will move and give him 20-30 sec of "darkens" which he does not have now. It is a plus. He can safely disengage or cap or whatever. While now you place 3 fighters over 3 caps an no dd will cap it unspoted. You can not do it now. It is just not the same 100% uptime permaspot while not gimping strike. And posibility of multispoting. Talking from point of 1 cv.

It is closing skill gap because it is no more cv vs cv game. It is not a duel as before. Offc better player will do more for team as in any class but he can not shut noob down and still carry team. And yes it is a nerd. If any it is a nerf in spoting. About dmg we will see soon. Also lower tier CVS lose much power. T6 and t 8 lost a lot. I would say they can not carry game anymore as before. Strike potential is much lower.

Now you have permaspoting and striking in same time. And real permaspoting. In new play you do not have that and strike capability. You need to reload and move from target. Now you can hover 2 bombers all the time and still have 3 fighters and 3 TB for strike. While other caps are not spotted. Simple is that. New playstyle nerfed cv spoting big time. And no way you can turn that around. 8 planes vs 1.... About strike. You change direct strike for dot dmg that can or can not happen. Many many times I got 3 drops with 0 flood. About potato and flack. Potato with rocket planes WILL hit dd and you can not stop it like you can now cause no 2 fighters and rockets are idiot proof dmg with high speed planes.

If you most play dd this CV rework is bless for you. No more 3 cap simultaneous spot aka permaspoted whole game because cv now have 1 squad instead of 6 or 8. Big difference. Also no more instadeath from cross drop of good cv player. Yes still he can hunt you and do dmg to you with rocket or bombs but at least 2 other spots are in dark. This change is direct buff for dd. And very soon you will not meet 3 CVS per side P.s. Planes no more spots torps so it is also plus.

Well no. Not a single ship has/had influence as good cv in game

Well yes. Influence of cv will be much smaller. From spoting to oneshoting. And it will not be duel of cv vs cv do eaven 38% will do something. While in current gameplay other cv would totally shut him down.

Finally it is over. To many 38% wr guys in t10 CVS ruined games for others

where they were target practice...as explained before. nobody denies that IT had 4-th or 5-th largest navy...but what they did with it was totally other story and in 42 they were "grounded" because lack of fuel. the end.

i know you feel but hurt because you are IT but you need just to live with that nobody outside Italy thinks IT navy did anything in WW2 than beeng target practice for RN/RAF

if you would look at the discussion from the start you would see that in fact i defend WG choice for going for RU ships before some other new nation for 2 reasons: - they are RU company - no other nation (that is not in game) had any more significant role than RU navy, we can argue if IT had the same in those 3 year or similar, but when we combine that with fact that WIG is RU company there really is not a big complaint for going for RU instead IT navy.

no, it is how much it was involved not how big it was. if i am not mistaken ( and i am not) most IT navy battles went like this - BBS in port...RN/RAF suprize attack = 3 BBS sunk..it is not naval battle. on other hand RU for 6 years did convoy escorts, AAA cover over biggest battles of war like Stalingrad, Moskva...if anything RU navy was 4 years longer in war

not a big ones, but IT navy from 42 was docked and in 43 surrendered

but their player base is slowly growing, and CV rework will not have big inpact....we all remember shitstorm about radio location....and nothing happened...forum is full of whiners....95% of playerbase never ever enter forum

agree

because i think it is true

i dont have time or will for this, if you wanna believe that ITA navy had more engagement in ww2 than RU - be my gust. If you wanna leave WOWS because the insult you by not making ITA ships but went for RU line - be my guest i am fine with both

Austr-Hungary did not exist Italy had less action than RU (it is easy checked facts) Yugoslavia had almost 0 action pls share your intel who had more action in WW2 and that we do not have them in game?

n,o it is ok because WG is "russian". they did not "rape" this game with RU ships....almost every other "real" naval power has much more ships than RU also i am not russian and i prefer RU BB line over couple of ships from HU, AU, Italy......why? Because RU side did more naval fighting in ww2 than those other nations P.S. RU ships are not OP, and they have less OP ships than other nations...only OP thing in RU is Stalingrad and now start counting: Saipan Black Flint kamikazy Belfast That italy t5 BBs Lo Young

1. yes...AAA is OP it needs to be tuned down.....agree on DDs....they will hurt alot 2. it is RU game, so it is ok.....every ship in this game is "fantasy" ship becasue it only share name with ship that existed 3. this really is not a thing to object 4. same as 3. 5. agree 6. to much conternten in same patch...i can understand that 7. this WHOLE GAAME IS ARCAD - i dont know whyyou cna not live with magical bufs but can live that some ships have cloacking device..you know there were no stealth in real life 8. dont buy it 9.. i really do not see any major objection

tanking is not historically accurate.....ships went down or were severely crippled after 2 torps..here...10 are not problem for "tanks" also pls point me to "heal" in real battles

i am not mocking it, i am just stating that realism would kill game play. most peoples when talking about realism here are talking about things that have nothing in common with realism but game play, same peoples accept that dd in invisible!!!!!! but object lobing iceland style of play because it is NOT REAL, but have no problem with droping tops from 5,4 km unseen.....wtf?? every aspect of imaginary gameplay that peoples dont like is NOT REALISTIC, but will accept 99% other stuff that have nothing in common with realism because they do not object that.

why i am silly....there were no concealment in real life :) also: limited ammo a fact that all map except ocean are 100% unrealistic overheating of engines killed crew ramming 1 km battle of BBS mate this is 100% imaginary elemnt game and as such it would be unplayable if it had 30% realism in it

engine could not be reparied in 30 seconds fire can not be repaired in 20 seconda guns can not shoot 200 rounds in 20 minutes (cooling problem) there were no "lock" targets and torpedo indicators ships could not engage and disengage in 2 minutes (stealth) dds did not have "cloacking device - you no see me in 5.8 km ships could not survive more than couple of direct hits from large caliber guns there were no magical "repair party" or deff AAAA and so on and on and on now imagine how boring game would be if this imaginary effects were real..engine out = end of game = crew repairing engine 30 days

no it does not matter because game play would be boring..

on t 7 you lose credits only if you are extremely bad player. This game has totally different economy than wow...it is so easy to have money without premium account and if you play the game for 1+ year you for sure have couple of freemiums and farming money is just so easy....i am sitting on 160 millions....