Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

veslingr

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    477

Everything posted by veslingr

  1. veslingr

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    No that is not a problem.....there should not be "no fly zone" and WG stated there will no be immunity...
  2. veslingr

    Montana buff when?

    yes..that is why Monty is most used BB in competitive gampleply..because it suck..so hard...those presice 12 guns....sucks.....thise devastatig stikes on cruisers..so bad.....
  3. veslingr

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    because they are whiners?
  4. veslingr

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    clear LTP issue
  5. veslingr

    Harugumo vs Khabarovsk

    For me, no question asked, harugumo is better ship. by better i mean more effective in and more beneficial towards win. Those 2 ships, even both are dakadaka have totally different play style.
  6. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    and Cvs do 20% less overal dmg :)
  7. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    No problem, glad to help you :) Just one thing, in this terrible times, when potatos in CV farms everything in their path and game is unplayable you have steady increase in every possible stats including WR, PR, survavibility? In last 21 days you have +0,04 in WR, + 4 in PR and +0,05 in battles survived so i really do not see that devastating impact on your play, or stats except personal dislike of meta.
  8. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    You can not balance uniqumsbecause they will outplay you no matter what :) if you look average stats for CVs you will not find them overthetop. In fact they do not stand over other classes. and most "cryers" will never pull stats to prove their point. Because stats do not support idea that CVs are OP in any regard.
  9. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    so if most CVs are bad, and do not influence game that much it means CVs are balanced...remember that WG balance ships on gameplay of average players....so if they nerf them, most games (average players) would be basically useless.
  10. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    And you should not be 100% safe in my opinion. But with good positioning and team play you will reduce CV strike by 80 - 90 %
  11. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    I play mostly DD and dont have that problem. How's that?
  12. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    If you think so you will be CV priority target.
  13. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    Don't confuse smart play and passive skill. Shooting over island does not make you immune but unable to strike. From other side. From side you are very much vulnerable. There are no defeat. Only different playstyle that you can love or hate but that is personal feeling and has nothing to do with balance of game.
  14. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    Pasive skills should never be able to "win" over player....so WG did GJ here...... or if we gonna go that path pls ad skills that: - make you totally immune to HE - make you totally immune to torpedos - Make you totally immune to citadel hits. fun, isnt it?
  15. veslingr

    Making ranked less fustrating

    Rework how xp is gain and we solved problem.
  16. veslingr

    remove cv from ranked

    Well it kinda need to be 2 km from dd. So it is some kind of skill. If dd knows how to play he has room to do his job.
  17. veslingr

    That shouldn't be possible #CV #ranked

    So you want that passive skill stop other player. Not anymore.
  18. veslingr

    remove cv from ranked

    When Ranked become competitive? :)
  19. veslingr

    remove cv from ranked

    funny....i will not mention names, but some of guys who cry here, in all seasons are on 42% WR (yes even seasons when CV was not part of Ranked)....but now they have excuse :)
  20. veslingr

    Good aa change on pts

    Well I agree on a part of round world and sky:) just disagree about aaa sugestion :)
  21. veslingr

    Good aa change on pts

    Do you play CV? If you do you would know how wrong are you. This is a change that will give opportunity to do more strikes on aaa strongships.
  22. veslingr

    Good aa change on pts

    before any noob go blabing about cv main - last 90 battles - DDs are clearly unplayable
  23. veslingr

    Good aa change on pts

    still noobs will die from glorious pilots... still guys like OP wiil cry on bottom of the see...
  24. veslingr

    Is wargaming trying to finish this game

    i guess we are talking with BBs player :) it is nice that focus (with heavy BB meta) of whining from CV shifting to DDs....all is back in order :)
  25. veslingr

    Why is slingshot not fixed yet?

    Slingshot is not a bug, it is ingame mehanic. Problem with it is that with strong AAA it gives planes chance to survive so they got immunity, if they remove it planes would die like flys. they would neeto to revork the whole thing and i do not think it will be soon
×