-
Content Сount
2,975 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
477
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by veslingr
-
It looks like BBs are class that dominates Ranked in almost every stat. Wr DmG - top 5 star savers are BBs!!!! And popularity So is it time to limit OP class like in CB? In CB BBs are declared OP and reduced to 1.....time to do similar in Ranked?
-
As Belgian you should be ashamed of yourself and your country, it is producing most delicious chocolate in the world...and how many peoples dies from diseases that are related with overweight?....leave boxes alone, ban chocolate :)
-
I bet on Cyprus betting is very loosely regulated and you are fighting lost war in advance. Funny that this rattles you so much and not the fact that WG can tour bought/leased product turn to something totally different next day. To give exaggerated example. You pay with real money t8 premium ship and they can tomorrow turn in into t2 ship and have no legal obligation to refund you in any way except good will of WG. That rattles me more than luck containers because gamblers will gamble on 1.000.000.000 other legal online casinos, sport betting etc etc sites.
-
RANKED and skills of peoples there...
veslingr replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
Team with 48% wr in CB can not move forward to "R1 league". No matter the number of games. Nothing speculative about that. -
did anybody tested, which ones are better? or wich one is better for what purpose?
-
Well to use full legal terms this is not lottery because every containers wins.....in every there is prize. It is more like wheel of fortune where some slots have better prizes and others worst, but every slot has prize. That's why it is not "game of fortune" The thing I do not understand, why opt for ban of something you dont like (and have no need to buy) but others may like. I have clanmate who from 1 container got Lenin. He "payed" for him 1/10 of a prize. From 4 containers a got t5 and t 6 ship and in money turn I am in plus with those 2 ships. Offc I could get 0 ships and only flags and camos. But it was my decision and I do not feel robbed even if I did get crap. It was my decision and I knew odds were not on my side.
-
RANKED and skills of peoples there...
veslingr replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
Exactly my point. To rank out you need one of 2 thing. Skill or endurance. Or something in between. Less skill more endurance, more skill less endurance. But skill is not mandatory. For instance in CB endurance means crap. With 48% we you will never ever progress to highest league. There skill is mandatory factor. I am sad if you think guy with 48% wr and unable to rank out by saving stars in that amount of games is average player. For me average player is 55% wr guy. (But probably statistic would not agree with me because skill is deteriorating fast in this game). If you personally did not ranked out it only means your skill is to low for endurance you input in game. By simple words you did not grind hard enought. -
This ship will not be especially strong but it will be fun. And we know only fun is important here (so many say). I will take it just for sake of 20 km torps.
-
Containers will stay in most EU countries. Are they some kind of lottery? Yes they are. Are loterry allowed in most EU countries..yes the are. Main thing is that containers you do not need to buy to have same experience as other players. In short nobody force anybody to buy them if they do not like gamble.
-
RANKED and skills of peoples there...
veslingr replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
We can agree that we don't agree. Obviously your standards what is skill (picking right ship) is lower than mine. Guy in your example just was not patient enought. With 0 skill you need to invest alot of time or luck. -
RANKED and skills of peoples there...
veslingr replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
What is grind? Repetitive playing battles to reach some fix number of points/stars with no limit in attempts but fixed amount of stars required. In grind skill is not necessary part of grind. Time and patience is. Yes skill reduce time for grind but it is not needed for reaching final goal. It is like - earn 10.000 bas exp. Uniqums will reach it in 5 games. Potatoes in 25 games. But in the end you reach it by skill or by patients. But skill is not mandatory here. That is why I define Ranked as pure grind. Time is necessary part of it, skill is not. 45.9 WR guys shows us skill is not needed to ranked out. Same as skill is not needed to reach 10.000 base exp. P.s. If we would have fixed amount of attempts to rank out that it would not be a grind. -
RU hidden project ")
-
I just can not imagine how 15 or lower knots ships would fit in this game
-
[Discussion] How/if there should be lower income.
veslingr replied to Sir_Grzegorz's topic in General Discussion
Steel should be premium resource for competitive gameplay. Coal.....I think that is good idea. -
RANKED and skills of peoples there...
veslingr replied to remenberMYname's topic in General Discussion
Lowest WR for this season and R1 is 45,9% ....45.9!!!!!! Can we agree that Ranked is pure grind. Good players will grind it in 50 games, bad in 500.....but in the end anybody can grind it if have patients and time -
[Discussion] How/if there should be lower income.
veslingr replied to Sir_Grzegorz's topic in General Discussion
I would lower income drastically. It is only way to "punish" bad play @higher tiers. Right now you can potato on tx without worry about your silver bank. I would bring economies to WOT level. -
Don't conclude. It is not your stronger side.
-
How world you know?:)
-
Funny guy
-
WG probably has that stats. Also I think prem camo(?!) Is calculated in exp gains..prem acxount(?!)...we know this site is not counting base exp which would be most accurate but takes some modifications into account).
-
Sadly not. It is whole seasons stats. And one more important stat that is missing is ship that saved star the most....many claim it is CV. Average dmg combined with low number of games does not support that. I would bet Kreml saved more stars than Haku due to 1.5 more games (more chance to save star) plus slightly higher dmg primary Ap On other hand GC had 15% more dmg than haku, 100% more games and he also had more saved stars due to large margins in plus dmg (admited alot of fires) and more games. It is my guess. I just do not see reason to remove CV. Low number of games and mediocre stats in general.
-
If we remove all stats. Ship that you see 2 games in 100 games is not gamebraker, and 2 others CV did nothing. Clear conclusion, supported by stats CV as class did not broke Ranked. They did not dominated ranked. If you ranked out in 200 games you saw them 10 times where 6 times were bad Aud and Midway and 4 times dangerous Haku who's efficiency probably was lovered because potato heard it is flavor of the month.
-
Haku 2% of games Kreml 4.7 % of games. Kreml was 150% more played than haku and beeing 3th in wr and 3th in dmg shows that in general public it is stronger and more influential ship than Haku. About skill we do not know. We can guess. But potato also can freexp. Let's talk about yamato and GC?
-
So if anything stats shows that Kremlin with 4.7% games played and position ind dmg and we were more OP and dominant than Hakuryu. OP also ranked out in Kremlin....
-
Haku was in 2% of battles. CV were totally in 5% of battles. Midway and RN ones have disasters stats all over and did not influence battles at all. Haku is 6th in Wr (not so important) and 6th in total dmg dealth. Funny charts is dominated with BBs where Kremlin domination is obvious. So 2% of games, middle of charts....no CV did not influence battles in whole. On other hand BBs did dominate all stats. Over 36% battles were in BBs, five top dmg dealer are BBs.... Observation of low number of cruisers is wrong. They were second most played class with almost 30%.
