Jump to content

Skyee_8492

Players
  • Content Сount

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan

    [UKGB]

About Skyee_8492

  • Rank
    Leading Rate
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

471 profile views
  1. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    Again i've had more experienced players i know have 4/5+ bad games in a row with bad teams and managed to keep there star every time yet still make the same line of thought i made. You get what the MM gives you and since its only rank 8 its not exactly going to be all T10 players with tons of game experience. Get a couple of bad players in a 6vs6 format and you can bet you're going to get more often than not crushed. Which FYI is facts.... Yall just claiming stupidity atm like this is only happening to me, it must be just me and non of you have ever experienced a thing. Another pointless effort on both yall parts but wp tho, wp cause its clear nobody whats a conversation rather just knock me down a peg or 2 which is sad really. Erm Stay mad i guess, you can't get them 1 ups on me you wanted FYI I won't be wasting my time on you cryers anymore cause frankly i don't care to argue with grown women... I promise you i won't check this bout stay stay booing to yourselves lmao I guess the next time you have a string of bad games remember it wasn't the MM or the lack luster players, it was just you since you was in the games. :D Laters Gaters
  2. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    He's not right, its his opinion and one i saw coming a mile off and not a very good one. I new people would go looking and complain about mine rather than trying to see my general point like i'm the only one who's experiencing this which i'm not i can assure you more experienced players i know have also brought up the same issues without my input.
  3. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    i think at this point does it even matter. It's not like anybody here has actually responded to the main point of the thought now is it
  4. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    I was just a thought, an idea like it needed to be a flushed out idea like im presenting into WG like they care. I did know y'all be this up tight about ones opinion and start the water works about me hiding mine and even if they was like 65% W/L win 10000 games you'd all still cry about something so if they was on show or not you'd still be booing about something if not that then something else. Gotta stay sucker free in a world full of lolly pops
  5. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    Duh! I knew people would go looking...
  6. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    I can only assume you guy's done like decent competition and lasting games since that are more often than not 1 sided since y'all crying about it Why wouldn't anybody want to have a decent games with players who're on the same par
  7. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    I made it clear stats are just a general broad scope of how good a player is like you can't have played 3000 games plus and still suck that hard. Y'all trying to claim the high ground that you won't get jumping off topic to my point with childish points to make which honestly should be no surprise at this point. Yall just some hypocritical [edited]mfs who tried to check mines to get one up and you couldn't now sour faces everywhere XD love it and quirkr, you're easily the worst offender cause if my stats was open they'd have go me first and you wouldn't be singing that same song. Take a seat pal, take a seat!
  8. Skyee_8492

    Better Ranked Battles " IN MY OPINION "

    Lmao to those who checked my profile to make a case ;) thats exactly why i hide my stats so you planks can't make a stupid unrelated case against me and trust me W/L is over 50%, about 5000 games played in case y'all was wondering. It's sad you couldn't just disagree or /& make a counter point or just pass on the thread instead you try to attack cause you feel insulted lmao sad. Nice you know yall feel some kinda way tho :P
  9. Ranked Battles The introduction of some kind of criteria I think it's about time Ranked Battles had some of kind of criteria that allows only the more genuine players to play this mode? How many times have to been given a bad deal on the MM and the match is totally 1 sided, lasted 2 minutes and you never stood a chance due to a picking of lack luster players who ain't really interested in ranking up. I know it's happened to me and when i check the guilty players out they always have what i would consider under par stats now generally i disregard stats in the grand scheme of things they are so general but they can help you get a general idea of how the person plays. Usually a sub standard W/L ratio is a good indicator i.e 3000 matches played with a W/L of 45% is a good indication that player is just not that interested and i've seen stats like theses. I enjoy ranked but its so aggravating when you get sold up the swanny by dilly dally players who throw games away with what i would consider Yolo plays especially since its mid tier ranked and anybody can just join in, it doesn't make it very enjoyable when you real rank 10 and you get a string of bad games now you're back at rank 12. The last ranked was a total chore with it being T7 and easily my worst performance with 160 games and i couldn't even crack into the 9s because i didn't play the Sinop and camp the game away behind an island i stood no chance of leveling up which i just gave up on but i digress. Ranked in my option needs some kind of criteria that only allows those above average players to be allowed access or completely change how players progress in ranked by binning of that stupid winner star that allows the top player to keep rank if that team lost cause half the time it doesn't make sense how the camper who did little in the way of strategic play comes top over the players being a little more active for example. Ideally it should be modified to allow the top half of a team to keep rank of the bottom 3 to be demoted. The top star does little in the way to promote team play since everybody is to concerned out winning themselves rather than the team which this game lacks criminally outside of divving up with people you know or clans. Edited: for format (please think mobile users too while posting)
  10. Skyee_8492

    Ark Royal "Historical" Camouflage

    I see your point but i personally wouldn't call it historical, its loosely historical. It's more of a throwback or paying homage but definitely not historical in my sense of the word. Maybe they should have pegged as "MS4a Type" camo rather than historical. I mean sure Ark's actual camo isn't all that but i can live with it due to its historical accuracy & that's personally what i like, Accuracy.
  11. Skyee_8492

    Ark Royal "Historical" Camouflage

    NEED HELP So I'm building a model of the HMS Ark Royal & I'm having some trouble finding any images of this "historical" camouflage. I have a few model warships in my collection and i don't want them to be all grey so I've decided to paint various camo schemes to for color diversity. Originally i was writing this for some help if anybody who reads this has this so called "historical" camo, i'd much appreciate some screen shots cause i can't find any of the other side which i assume is mirrored but also some bridge close ups and some stern shots cause all i can find are these 2 and a couple of others which are all bow shots of various angles which brings me onto my next point. I will say i'm making this as an assumption but why WG present this as an historical camouflage of the Ark Royal? Literally as i was typing this out i made one last ditch attempt to try find images of this camo before putting this out there. Low and behold, an image caught my eye and after clicking this link it turns out this so called "Historical Camouflage" isn't really historical as it seems. I mean yeah you could say its an historical camouflage but its not for the Ark Royal, Its for Illustrious! It's called MS4a Camo carried from 1940-42 & is not symmetrical but what i don't understand and I'm basing this on a lack of not knowing FYI but why present this as an historical camouflage when it isn't because I'm assuming WG isn't presenting of as an Illustrious camo for the Ark Royal and if that's the case it's very misleading which is why i can't find any images of this but also personally speaking disrespectful calling it historical when it isn't, Not for this ship. It's cheeky & i don't want to ring this bell for to long but what exactly is WoWs trying to be? Historically accurate? <LOL definitely not, Partly historical accurate where WG feels necessary? Making it up? It's all a little confusing since WG pride themselves in the topic but they do things like that which to me seems dishonest. It seems to me the focus has gone from trying accuracy initially to now just moving into making it up. Like I've said, This is mainly assumption but i wouldn't rule it out but to the original point & if you've made this far. Some Screenshots if you have this camo would greatly be appreciated.
  12. Skyee_8492

    Giulio Cesare

    Slow but steady productivity.
  13. Skyee_8492

    Giulio Cesare

    Yeah haha Its getting out of hand. Once these are done that's it.... I think! I can't possibly display them all at the same time so i think i'll just rotate them.
  14. Skyee_8492

    Giulio Cesare

    Started on 2 more haha not that i don't have at least another 4 on the go haha
  15. Skyee_8492

    Giulio Cesare

    That's sweet asf, Very well done sir! :) And yeah but i have plenty of time atm as we all do haha
×