Wulf_Ace

I am close to finish grinding her, well its not bad ,not terrible. Its "diffrent" , long reload, not that great turn rate, not possible to fire ships. On the other hand, long torpedoes, great dmg even against battleships, sometimes it feels real tough, unlike other tier 7 ships I had. I would put her somewhere in the middle if not maybe above middle tier 7s. You have to adopt to her different gameplay, thats it, after that you will like her. Edit: Other tier 7s I ve played, -Schors is really paper ship, every hit no matter where goes a lot of my HP -Helena, great fast guns but no range, and also squishy -New Orleans, definitely the worst, really strong AP but thats all he has, paper hull, slow turn rate, slow acceleration, feels like a new paper mexico.

So one picture is Des Moines taking 33 750 dmg from BB Republik,a bit too much for back side of the ship? THe second one is Stalingrad one shooting(detonation) Yamato from this angle.

When I update other games WoWs seems so small. Just see the Call of duty warzone, the updates are over 10, 15GB, that is ridiculous!

Then nobody would play the game, and THEN the WG would realize hey its not the players its us. Wargaming ruined WoT by greed this game is going in that similar way,even bigger since less players plays it,so every "smolensk" annoying ship will chase away even more players. If by now you didnt realize that wargaming in their games never listens too players (hence the submarines,cv-s) then you will either stop playing or stop complaining. When downloading this game there should be a sign, Wargaming doesnt care,"copyright".

you dont even own Venezia, I hate crying on forums about things like this, oh CV are strong, venezia is strong, smolensk is strong, jesus deal with it or stop playing the game. THere are million games there to play.

you see more then one-two venezias in game? in opposit where I see 4-5 stalingrads in one game.

Yeah so OP, that everybody plays her in CB, hmm wait they are not. I rather play my Des Moines with good tankines, fast reload then 20 sec "battleship" venezia.

So they were sister ship, both the same, so why does one has normal 28 cm (11 in) C/34 guns and the other Gneisenau has 38 cm (15 in) SK C/34? So the Germans planned to rearm them with bigger guns but they never did, so i really dont see a point of giving one of them normal guns and the other one guns he never had. Since the difference in damage almost in half, then 19 sec reload on Schnarnhorst is too much? Maybe just maybe putting an option on Gneisenau to mount 28cm guns? and to research the other one. Grosser Kurfurst has that option of big or smaller caliber guns . While Tirpitz and Bismarck as also the same sister ships, they have the same guns mounted on them,and Tirpitz as premium ship also gets buffed with torpedoes? So my question is, why does wargaming treats ships that are of the same build (class) diffrenty?

Do you know what I do when I dont like some game? I dont play it. Goodbye now

Then Tirpitz should have been tech tree ship and Bismarck premium

Can a man dream? :)

You cant really say that "knowing" how good or bad player is cant help you to decide your tactic in general. That I want to say, that its not a thing that it bothers you to have in game. It can be used as a stats same as knowing what ship has what armament same as knowing how good is the player who plays it, right?

Well with your explanation then it doesnt matter the MM,since you dont choose to attack better players, right?

Lets say a situation: you see two enemys, both you can attack, but you see one player is really good while other is really bad, which one will you attack? Which one is a bigger threat to your team and your victory?

No Smolensk no Jean Bart, there is little to nothing interesting to buy now for coal. Guess I ll continue to save my coal

I got 5 and when I saw 5 I laugh so hard. WG are a bunch of funny guys.

Yes there is, press P and enjoy.

Why do you all complain? Lets be honest, they wouldnt make this event if people dont buy this things. So who is here to blame then us. If we do really unite and dont buy a single thing, they would stop or change to something else and better. But players will buy and buy stuff to get this things, to buy things that they can grind anyway in next second patch, (except camuflage), but still its not worth it. This is one of the psychological thing. People want things that many cant have, they want to be unique, be better, and if they have money why not? Right? So in conclusion if you really want to change something start a topic or chat somewhere about stoping all players to buy this stuff, if they stop getting money they will stop making this events. But that will never happen and we are to blame not them.

DD- Maass CL- Helena but grinding Schors also as option BB- Schnarhorst but Gneisenau is the best, maybe if I have credits I ll buy him again since I was dumb enough to sell it.

He was the only light in that movie

why would they put those ships in game, what would be their place in game and tactic exactly?

Yes I saw a post, cant remember where exactly now but they did confirmed that selling moskva will get you credits and with PATCH 0.9.5 also a brand new ship. So, wait for patch 0.9.5 and sell it day before, get credits, get ship.

So when I wrote players with low IQ I got warning point, but when you write dumb as rocks thats ok. I guess there are really WG levels of insulting others.

I think that effects all players mentally , when somebody is telling you are bad then you play bad, when somebody encourages you then you try your best. Chat is very important in this game and every other game.

cant be worst then a movie about that ship...