Aragathor

To absolutely no one's surprise more than half of the entries in this list are for Russian fake-paper carriers. Because there is no Russian Bias and the sun sets in the east.

WG then has arguments that certain modes are not "popular". This is how you stack the deck against your customers. Gaming companies today, with few exceptions, are not about fun and entertainment, they are about nickle and diming their customer base for every cent.

The more I play it the more I feel like taking reload mod is a dumb choice, the lack of range really hurts the ship.

So having better damage, better penetration angles, shorter fuse time, etc. makes the guns inferior. Gotcha. And Moskva has real tangible drawbacks that pay for the gun performance. It has almost no side armor. So when it is not nose in it suffers.

Well, could you please explain to me how reducing the AP penetration will make Petro identical to Moskva? Because one look HERE shows that reducing the armor penetration on the Petro guns will still leave enough other differences between it and the Moskva. And it doesn't make Moskva overpowered in any way. You don't see anyone moaning about Alaska because it was removed from sale and is now a Christmas scam box stuffing, like other "balanced" ships like Kamikaze.

Handling is not the best, the speed is good, but the massive turning circle is a pain. I've built mine for extra rudder and it helped, a bit.

Only the T7 perma is for free. WG was too lazy and cheap to create a T5 and T6 perma for players. And T8 requires doubloon packs to get.

Isn't that the T5 Japanese cruiser? Haarlem's 203mm and Johan de Witt's 240mm say hi.

A ship I would be reluctant to use in real life in the Black sea or the Baltic. Imagine an Atlantic storm and this ship. Well, ranked and CB are not the main modes to balance around. Unless you want to make dumb changes, like the YY nerf. The ship should be decent at something, and nose tanking is one thing it has. Plus, raising the sides would make it suffer from the same weakness as other similar Russian cruisers, low broadside survivability.

Nope, what Petro needs is a normalization of the 220mm guns so they don't behave like 380mm guns. And also it needs to be raised, because it has too little freeboard to actually go out at sea. PS: If you look at the ship in the dock port you can see the ship has a massive draft, much larger than comparable ships in it's class. WG artificially lowered the freeboard on it.

I really love how brawls are decided on the loading screen when a triple division faces off against solo players. Just shows how utterly incompetent WG is when it comes to understanding their own game.

I think Suffren would be a good choice for a premium at T6. Different from the silver cruiser and real.

If he knows his IGN then he or you can go here: https://eu.wargaming.net/support/en/products/lgn/help/29319/29321/29322/29323 Good luck with customer support. You'll need it.

Survivability is decent thanks to the combo of super heal and concealment. The accuracy is average, you miss some shots and it can be frustrating. Performance wise it's not an OP ship in the hands of a normal player. As to whether it's fun, I'd say that it is fun only to a small portion of the player base. The short range is a killer to all long range snipers that like to camp. And she's also not built for yolo plays.

I have 3, plus 2 20p that are close.

Did they ever care? When? The community effectively has a great game in front of them and a dev team hell bent on making the game worse. The only real and large improvements we see is after WG is faced with massive image losses.

For battleships I'd say Agincourt for premium, for silver König but with a decently skilled captain. Reason is simple, secondary ships at this tier can back the play of their teammates and in small engagements won't be too focused to feel it. For cruisers I'd go for Exeter or Furutaka. Both ships have strong 203mm guns and workable torps, Exeter also has a heal. For DDs the situation is complicated. Minekaze is a strong contender, but not the greatest as the guns are lacking. Nicholas with the 4x3 torp and decent guns can also do work, if you are willing to torp rush. Same goes for Okhotnik.

In dem Fall sage ich es war der Spieler und nicht das Schiff!

Auf den potenziellen Schaden zu schauen ist ein Fehler den die Devs machen. Nur weil etwas möglich ist, bedeutet es nicht dass es auch passiert. Die Ballistik der Geschosse auf der Dido/Rahmat ist grauenhaft im Vergleich zu Huang He. Deshalb werden auch die meisten Schüsse nicht treffen. Die Rahmat ist komplett abhängig von den Torpedos, ohne sie ist das Schiff nutzlos. Die Dido hat Torpedos mit kurzer Reichweite und schlechtere Ladezeit auf den Kanonen. Und dafür möchte Wargaming Geld.

Yes, even got an achievement for it. Sadly though no idea how to get the others.

The LittleWhiteMouse/Chobbitsu designed HMCS Sackville camo for the Yukon is available for free under the camo tab in-game. Also, their flag design is a simple 5 win mission active for all Yukon owners.

Can we get a requirement description for all of the achievements in the article? Because "When you receive a tile with an achievement for the first time, this achievement is credited to your account. Together with each achievement, you will also receive the Lunar Warrior themed camouflage as a gift." says nothing beyond the basics and is lazy.

I have the same issue. It's the graphical improvements that WG praised so much that are creating issues. There is no fix to this. Also, whatever they done also broke TXAA, as now it creates a lot of fuzzy graphics. For example on planes. You can even see it during official WG streams.

Naval battle still has Submarines in, and they are marked as double bonus too.

It's sad how WG once again made sure to make an event worse and less rewarding for the players. The German Battlecruiser release was such a promising thing, but WG in their greed again works hard to destroy any goodwill from those changes to grub for money. The T8 perma camo has to be paid for with doubloons (3000 doubloons to be precise as token packages sell for 1000 db per 800 tokens, that's the same price as regular camo), leaving only the T7 perma camo obtainable without spending cash. Plus the T6 ship has not been provided with an event perma camo, why? The answer is simple, WG is endlessly greedy and dumb.