Jump to content

Systergummi

Players
  • Content Сount

    330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    8721
  • Clan

    [-GGS-]

About Systergummi

  • Rank
    Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia
    [-GGS-]

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Even if it was so. Another DD-setup would probably be better then the same. IFHE DDs (Akizuki, Kiev) beat cruisers, they are however big and clumpsy with bad consealment. A comp of Cossak, Loyang, Kidd, Lightning would probably be good against them. Then again they wouldnt be as good against a cruiser comp... And around we go.
  2. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Thanks for the insight. It kinda makes me sad though if thats how it is, that the balance between BBs and cruisers is that broken. Would it be viable to restrict team-comp even further then today? Say teams must have 1BB, 1 CA/CL, 1DD or 2 Cruisers and 2DDs? Or would it just restrict creativity?
  3. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    I would love to try it. And Im not questioning that heavy DD-comps are effective at t8. But back to the question at hand. Would 2 BBs per team break the game when CW goes back to normal (7vs7, t10). Saying that 2 BBs are to much would be like saying randoms cant be played at all. At high tiers its usually 5 BBs, 4-5 CA/CLs and 2 DDs, add in the odd CV. Sure people whine when DD-numbers go to high. As they do now in CW. In my eyes high cruiser-comps are just as bad. Why not force people to take balanced comps? If CW goes back to 1 BB and 5-6 Cruisers then Im not touching it ever again... sadly.
  4. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    But would 2 BBs in a mix of 7 ships really render Cruisers obsolete? I found this on Reddit just now btw
  5. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    LOL Is it really that strong? I say some people on Reddit claiming they counterd it with Bayards and Chappas I think. Maybe both? Have a minimum of one of each class. And a max of one of each ship? Im still not convinsed that the 1BB cap is nessesary.
  6. Systergummi

    How did you do with the "French Whaling"?

    I bought the 4 navy camos. I will probably play the french DDs a lot anyway. From the free containers I got 3 DDs, so with Sirocco I had enough for 2 bundles too.
  7. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Then again is it more unfair then the 1BB the rest CA/CL comp we had a lot in the last t10 seasons? Maybe we should cap DD-numbers to 2 or 3 as well?
  8. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Colbert truely terrifies me as a DD-player. Ive just met one so far, think it was Yuzruel or something (Omni). Udaloi can usually survive most ordeals, but I melted so fast it was incredible.
  9. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    So we would just get 2BB the rest DDs? Do you think clans would play that?
  10. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Well 5xKiev with IFHE might not be to fun to play against. Or any comp of Akizuki/Kiev/Cossak etc. Then again 5-6 cruisers rather limits DD-play to. So balance? Maybe its the most fun for everyone?
  11. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    But does it rule out cruisers? Teams would probably still field atleast 2? For flanking (herassing) and for stationary map-controle (DM, Salem etc).
  12. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    True! HIV and Moscva are not bad eighter. To me crossfire seems like good, smart gameplay and should be encouraged?
  13. Systergummi

    2 BBs in Clan Wars?

    Im just curious to why there is a cap at 1 BB. I played CW a lot the first season, a little the second and then I found that playing a DD in heavy cruiser meta was booring and unrewarding so I stopped. Yesterday I played 5 games and had a blast. We ran 1 BB (Vlad no suprise) and 1 DD (me in a Cossak) and 4 cruisers, as did every team we met. There were on average 2 radars on each team but the duration is so much lower on t8 that moving around was fairly easy. Ive read on Reddit that a lot of teams run high DD-comps this season. Especially on the SEA server. A lot of people seem upset by this, atleast on Reddit. I cant understand why. 5-6 cruisers as is the norm in CW t10 7vs7 and that is ok? What would happen if teams could field 2 BBs when the next season starts and we go back to the t10 norm. Would we get more balanced teams with 2 BB 3 CA/CL and 2 DD? Or will it screw things up in ways that I cant comprehend? Regards
  14. Systergummi

    WG you have got to teach your players

    I wasnt suggesting anything I was wondering how a skillbased MM would look like. Then again Im sorry for my pottymouth.
  15. Systergummi

    WG you have got to teach your players

    But how do you make a skillbased MM? WR is out of the question. If you put people with high WR against each other over 100s or 1000s of games of canselling out each other their WR will be as crappy as the 40% shits which will also cansel each other out. Everyone will have around 50%. At which point great players will again be matched against retarded ones as the MM cant tell them apart. PR might work better but constantly being matched against other people with good PR will limit what you can do and bring it down. If you have crappy PR playing other crappy players will allow you to survive longer, thus doing more, thus increasing your PR.............
×