Cammo1962

SNAFU bots ??

Well @YabbaCoe WG could just let the Missouri go back to what they original promised and stop hidding it behind loot/gambling boxes. Or is it because that it is more lucrative to keep the loot/gambling boxes for WG (And please dont give me a none answer) ??

It will be a cold day in hell before he appers @King_Of_The_Potatoes

Well @Tanaka_15 trust has to be earned too

Well @Bellegar that grunt will be SNAFU and FUBAR.

Hi @Crysantos by dont push a none important employee under the bus while one of the big bosses goes free

Only some @Yabbacoe so where is the logic in only some ??

If you belive this game is free to play you are dead wrong buster. WeeGee lives for people to buy ships, doubloons and loot boxes.

The problem right is that WeeGee does not care about us veterans they only care about getting new players in sothat they can spent money on ships andlootboxes. And after a couple of month they will leave when they find out how scummy WeeGee is.

Regarding WeeGee there is no logic and there will never ever be that @leonport

No no you spelled it wrong it is spelled spreadsh@@t

This here is from the danish MSN https://www.msn.com/da-dk/underholdning/spil/aggressive-monetisation-driver-spillere-væk-fra-world-of-warships/ar-AANB1Cp?ocid=sf

It´s simple they will say: Sorry we cant explain it because of miscommunication @ShipForBrains

Damm did not get the bribe

Well have right now reached out to a local news media here in Denmark and explained them about the situation so hoppefully the will make a story out of it.

Nope @MementoMori_6030

Naaaah i would not dream of doing that @CptBarney

Hi @MrConway i think you might thik that over about the fun, banter and information because people want answers sorry to say that.

Den snupper jeg når jeg kommer hjem.

As i have done in here is calling out them over the twins and will dø the tonight in WoWs stream @Camperdown

Yesterday Jingles put this up on his facebookpage. The Mighty Jingles This copied from my response to the WG response on the EU forums: While I appreciate everyones' response to this non-apology that completely fails to address any of the core issues and seems to be worded in such a way as to try to not provoke any further outrage in the hope that all of this will simply go away soon, I feel that it's important we all stop and take a healthy dose of reality. 1. No-one should have been expecting any specific details to be forthcoming about how WG plan to address the core issues - increasingly aggressive monetisation and the locking of more and more core game components behind gambling walls in a game that children as low as the age of 7 can play. They simply haven't had time yet to formulate any strategy where that's concerned. However, the fact that Wargaming has specifically failed to even mention they have any plans to tackle these issues should tell you just how committed they are to ensuring these things remain part of their monetisation strategy. They're even attempting to normalise gambling by offering freebies in the shape of lootboxes too - just look at how you gain early access to submarines. Make no mistake, things will get worse, not better, regardless of how many people vote with their wallets in protest. 2. The simple reason for this is that none of us matter to Wargamings' monetisation strategy. Oh I'm sure they'd prefer that we all remained paying customers, but they don't really care that much if we don't. After all, there's only so many times they can sell us a Marco Polo or a Pommern. Once we've bought a premium ship or bundle that's one revenue stream permanently closed to them. No matter how many of us give up and walk away in disgust, nothing will change, because new customers are where Wargaming are focussing their priorities - customers who aren't used to the predatory monetisation and haven't seen years of community dumpster fires brushed off with the same non-apologies of empty promises to do better in future. New customers they can sell Marco Polos and Pommerns to, until they get just as pissed off and start reacting the same way we are. We think that customer turnover and churn will make Wargaming sit up and take notice but it won't. Customer turnover and churn is Wargamings' monetisation strategy.

Hi @Crysantos this is not want we want but what wer we want is that WG goes back to what they said from the start the people could buy it for doubloons and NOT missions and absolutly NOT hidden behind a wall of loot boxes. So @Crysantos cant WG not just for once be true to what they have said ?? P.S. Perhaps it is time that i contacted some of our local media in my contry and told them about this situation. Kind regards Cammo192

Or something

As i understand it a firm that WG does their buissness with is under investegation for money laundering. And as i understand it it's falls at WG too @BrettMRC

Bly me only semi-serious you disapoint me @Gvozdika because are always so so serious