Cammo1962

Again @Seraphice we have told you that we jugde you aka WG by your actions not by your words because people still dont trust you aka WG because of their past. And yes WG has send surveys out regarding Superships and i will bet that most of them who answered said they were fun in their own mode and the same with subs, but again you still dont listen enough to us and as i wrote before there is plenty of historical ships implememnt to the game so why are you aka WG still proceeding with this stupid project ?? And dont come and tell me that it is because the wast majority wants because i dont belive that and i will bet that around 60% dont belive it either and you know that i got a valid point here.

That is a biiiig understatement @Seraphice. And 9 out of 10 times it will go through.

Dont forget that CVs and subs are WGs pet projects and you are not allowed to set fire on CVs or flood them with torps because that is "historical" correct

@Seraphice people liked to play them in the temp-mode that was created to them a while ago and people had said that but you/WG dont listen and that is the same with subs we liked them in their special mode not in the game and you god damm know that, but as i wrote we judge WG for their action and not what they write and that had been said plenty of times and not just by me but a lot others too. And you and WG that there is plenty of historical ships left to implement into the game and you aka WG still goes ahead with this stupid project. And i dont care how hars or angry that you the staff and WG will be at me i am brought up with always say my honest opinion and with your is that so ? i can see that you are pretty annoyed of me speaking up and to honest i dont give a s... Kind regards Cammo1962

And again @YabbaCoe you aka WeeGee give us something that we god damm dont want so again we judge WeeGee by their actions and not their words

Thx for the conformation @YabbaCoe

Is that global @YabbaCoe ??

So DDs have be punished for useing smoke ??

Perhaps but that he wrote still sounds like when a politician talks it is just bla bla bla and that i cant care less about i judge them by their actions not their words anymore and we in have to hold up to their word @RuruushuVuiBuritania

It's like hearing a politician talk when Seraphice writes that @RuruushuVuiBuritania

Say what @Andrewbassg ??

Well looking at the stats for the San Diego right now she is utter trash @Andrewbassg

@YabbaCoe chat when you are in battle on PTS is disconnected that must be a bug.

Just been out on PTS and there was f...ing 3 subs on each side so @YabbaCoe, @Seraphice aka WeeGee get some f...ing restrictions otherwise this game will be unplayable

Well @Verblonde it is one of WeeGees petprojects and nothing bad to CVs or subs should never be done to them we all know this

That is not true i as a BB and DD main has to active go in and spot the ships in my DD while a CV can sit in the back and just send his planes up and if WeeGee goes forward with this my DDs that have low concealtment will be worth nothing.

Research Bureau does not have ships on PTS @tank_buser87

I think it is a miscommunication from WGs side because it is normally all the ships in a nation that gets it @principat121 and here it is: The reward for completing each section of the collection is the ability to mount 2 flags on Italian destroyers, cruisers, and battleships, respectively. The final reward for collecting all elements of the collection is Italian destroyer VI Leone, a commemorative flag, and an achievement.

And why will US subs not be avaible during the test but others subs are @Seraphice ??

Well @YabbaCoe by not keep the AA historical correct (because from what i can see the AA is soooo much crap) the San Diego will and do repeat will not a interesting ship to play it will only be another port queen and WG knows that. And i do think that the Devs and you should read up about the San Diego and here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_San_Diego_(CL-53) and just read the first 4 lines and see how you aka WG are butchering this fine and noble cruiser.

@YabbaCoe WG claims to be historical correct but you are butchering the San Diego´s AA that was one of the best during WW2 and is there a reason to why WG does not like Bofors 40 mm AA guns and make them worse than they infact was ??

Dear @YabbaCoe aka WeeGee WTF are you thinking of here DDs and other ships have enough of a hard time and now you introduce this ??

Nope We dont need more CVs in the game there are enough of them and we have never wanted subs in the game but you aka WG still went ahead does that explain it or do you need further explaining @Seraphice ??

Schlieffen is a battle cruiser and not actually a BB and the Schlieffens guns has cruiser precision when they shoot but otherwise i do agree with you

That`s a difficult answer but i do like to brawl in my german BBs and that is where they all shine because the dispersion are so bad that it sometimes is hard to hit anything with the guns.