Taliesn
-
Content Сount
2,238 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
16405
Everything posted by Taliesn
-
Me está gustando mucho el Z-52, muy versátil
-
There is some twisting what I wrote and then there is this. The bit in bold is not true. I said there are poorer guns than Roma's at her tier and I stand by that. Not that there are worse ships than Roma. That doesn't mean she's the worst ship either, before you jump to conclusions. I'm not agreeing with you nor making your argument stronger. Learn to read, FFS. Bismark's guns are poor. So are Roma's to an extent, she still has one gun more though and deal more damage to begin with. Yes, no one has denied Roma's dispersion is poor, but she has other very good characteristics to compensate for this, so swings and roundabouts. She has better concealment than Bismark, is faster and is much more agile. And you are still doing better in her than with Bismark. Are you italian per chance or particularly infatuated with Roma? Or are you one of those that believe a premium ship should be better in just about anything than their same tier silver counterparts? Because other than that, I just can't get your point. Myself, I'm glad WG has released a BB that has weaknesses as well as strenghts. Therefore, balanced. In fact, tier VIII BBs are some of the better balanced ships in game per class/tier. Which is not something you can say about VII and IX for example.
- 174 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- roma
- italian bb
- (and 10 more)
-
Bismark a sniper compared to Roma? Christ on a bike, I've heard it all now. Not only it has one gun less and they do less damage, they are also notoriously poor at range and not particularly good against other BBs even at close ranges. You can give both ships 28km range they will still be poor. Roma has also better concealment, speed and is nimbler. Finally, players seem to be doing fine with Roma, btw (you have almost +15k with her than with Bismark for the love of god) and unlike someone that owns a Flint or a Black, there is no indication that only unicums have bought her. You being a case in point. There will always be a worst tier cruiser, just like there is a best tier one. That's life. And Hipper is not a very weak ship by any stretch of the imagination, unless you compare it to Kutuzov, and we know where that OP ship has ended. Maybe you don't play her to her strengths. Which she has. Pensacola is a nice ship, again, you have to know how to play her. Anyway, what kind of argument is that that you cannot grind a premium ship towards a better one? You knew what you were buying. You're all over the shop mate.
-
Yeah, nah. There is a whole line of BBs in game with poor guns compared to IJN, USA or RN BBs. Poorer than Roma's too in her tier. They are doing fine and are played a lot.
-
Absolutely no reason why you shouldn't be hitting more (and harder) with Iowa than with KM BBs. US shell velocity and arcs might be playing tricks with you if you're used to KM ballistics but other than that, nope, Iowa's guns are excellent.
-
Eeek? That's quite the feat considering he's rank 15 in the current Ranked season and he's unlocked Hakuryu less than a month ago...
-
I'm not sure what WG's intention was giving Roma better concealment than quite a few cruisers in game. You certainly don't need such a fantastic concealment in order to brawl. It's more likely they designed her as a hit and run cruiser-like BB rather than a pure brawler, armor notwithstanding. Another thing entirely different is players who want her to be something which she ain't. And another problem is, in order to force most of the playerbase to brawl and close support at caps you'd need to give a BB: Cruiser concealment (because it's no use being HE spammed from 16km out) Very good armor (because it's no use having to angle) Superb close range guns (because it's all about hitting and damage, right?) Torp. Protection (because torp wall skill) AA (because planes) Secondaries (because why not) A pair of b... There are IMO 3 main characteristics to balance a BB: Guns, Armor, Concealment/Mobility. And one of these should always be lacking (I'm looking specially at you, Conqueror) and further balance/diversity should be achieved through other stats/modules/gimmicks/whatever. And all BBs should have higher citadels.
-
Yamato y sus cañones "da lo mismo como te me pongas" Aunque para bajarte el Monqueror no hay que sufrir ni nada.
-
Prezackerly. Tal y como están diseñados añora (no puedo comentar cómo eran antes) son demasiado decisivos, ya sea a favor o en contra. Porque las características especiales del CV hacen que los 2 jugadores (rara vez ves 2 por bando más allá de tier IV-V) o mejor dicho, la habilidad de esos 2 jugadores en concreto, sea determinante de una forma que no lo va a ser nunca entre otros 2 jugadores, sean de DD, CA o BB. La capacidad de destruir un DD enemigo, de una sola oleada y desde una posición relativamente impune no la tiene ningún otro barco en el juego. Ninguna otra clase de barco tiene esa capacidad de desnivelar una partida desde el minuto 2. ¿Podrías copiar aquí ese post con tus ideas?
-
Entiendo que principalmente a torpedos, luego a bombas. El ataque manual en cazas, desde el punto de vista del resto de jugadores de la partida, es irrelevante.
-
Quitarlos del juego. Nah, ya en serio, no sé qué pueden hacer con ellos pero es evidente que con uno sólo por partida, si hay mucha diferencia en la habilidad de uno contra el otro, apaga y vámonos. Esta mañana un Taiho (enemigo, pero eso es lo de menos): 1ª Oleada, nuestro DD en A al fondo 2ª Oleada, nuestro DD en B al fondo 3ª Oleada, un NC (algo tocado) entrando en C al fondo, porque yo había salido de C después de capturar, intuyendo que venía a por mí. Lo que me lleva a pensar que ahora mismo están OP para los que son capaces de dominar su manejo, y completamente inútiles en manos de quien no sabe qué hacer con él. Nos quejamos de los BBs que envían al fondo a un crucero de una salva pero la capacidad que tiene los CVs de hacer lo mismo no sólo con cruceros sino con DDs es similar o mayor.
-
Eeeek? There is no captain skill that will increase your torps' range. There is one (level 2) that decreases it, your torps gaining +5 knots instead. Vigilance means you are able to spot torpedoes earlier
-
No te vas a liquidar a un DD full HP pero por debajo de 4-5k si no se anda con cuidado se va al fondo mientras tú disparas el armamento principal a un crucero/acorazado. Visto desde el otro lado, si vas en un DD intentas evitar que te espoteen dentro del rango de las secundarias de un Bismark/FdG/GK si o si. Si encima vas ya muy tocado, se convierte en una zona de exclusión. Añádele la hydro que llevan y generalmente te vas a buscar un objetivo más apetecible.
-
Things are getting worst, u must change something
Taliesn replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
I was more on about a DD's decission to start shooting when the enemy BB is on 2k instead of 10k and asking if that was steal killing or simply the DD being smart, waiting until he is more sure he's not gonna lose half his HP and then help. I wouldn't say it's steal killing myself. I can't see the point in launching torps against a target you know he will be gone by the time your torps arrive, but I can see why most players do it (myself included eh?) even though those torps usually end up being a threat to your team mates. Shooting at a bow on cruiser when you are sailing a 30 sec reload BB is not generally a good idea. Again, the situation may call for it, but generally speaking I'd rather wait 15 secs to have a better angle or even shoot at another target entirely. Did I even say I'd wait 1-2 minutes to shoot someone? Don't put words in my mouth. Yeah, maybe. Maybe I've already shot the other guns at another target near by. Stupid, sure, because RNG and dispersion. But that was my point. Securing a kill is everything. Overkill is probably what happens most of the time but it pays off to be on the safe side. -
Things are getting worst, u must change something
Taliesn replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
Bit of a hard reading that. Still none the wiser what that has to do with what I wrote. Particularly since you have quoted my bit about DDs doing the (not in my view) steal killing, rather than the next paragraph which was related to BBs, but hey ho. There are plenty of stupid BB and DD players (lets not go into CV players) out there but that was never the point from OP (AFAIK) nor mine. That those BBs in your match chose to finish off the enemy BB was not the problem. That they chose not to engage in the game at all was. Just like those line hugging DDs who don't want to cap/scout or that Des Moines I encountered this morning who was spamming HE from max range in Trap (A) instead of using his radar to help defend B. -
Things are getting worst, u must change something
Taliesn replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
So what about those DDs opening fire when the enemy BB is down to 2K? Are they kill stealing or doing their bit when he won't be insta-deleted? What about those launching torps that have absolute zero chance of ever hiting the target because half the team is already shooting at it? Are they kill stealing to? When on a BB you have one salvo every 25-30 secs. You have to make them count. Shooting at a bow on cruiser with poor dispersion means you will be lucky with a couple of hits. Same cruiser takes a beating from other angles and veers right/left and suddenly the skies open. This has nothing to do with the extremely bad player who camps at max range, no matter the ship he's sailing. 9 out of 10 times, it is always better to secure the kill. In a way it is not dissimilar to firing just one turret, thinking that'd be enough, because, you know, 5 km out, perfect broadside to my guns, other targets around... and then RNG happens. -
Scapa Flow, lo de Londres es una broma.
-
Una de esta mañana
-
Pero lo que argumenta Cromseth es lógico. Si en cada equipo hay 1 Super Unicum 1 Unicum 3 Buenos 3 Reguleros 3 Pobres 1 Manco/AFK Lo que consigues es que pasadas unas cuantas miles de partidas el Manco tenga el mismo o parecido WR que tú, o incluso podría ser mejor. Seguro que a ti no te molesta, pero más de uno habrá por ahí que echará pestes del resultado. Y pasadas 100.000 batallas, todos en 45-55% de WR Luego está el tema del PR, que cada jugador es un mundo y no es igual de bueno en todas las clases, ni en todos los barcos de una rama. Dicho esto, a mi la experiencia del juego me resulta agradable. Es más, prefiero las aleatorias a las ranked, fíjate. ¿Que una partida de cada diez es como si te pasen el rodillo? Pues si. También pasa al contrario. Pero disfruto el 80% de las partidas, y por eso sigo jugando e invirtiendo en el juego.
-
In a nutshell. Some people just want to be carried or have an easy ride.
-
Efectivamente, llevar un barco como el Missouri (o cualquier BB USA de tier alto, o cruceros tipo Minotaur, Des Moines o Hindenburg) a full AA no es óptimo. Si algún día arreglan los CVs y se ven en tiers VIII-IX-X tantos como puedes encontrarte en tiers bajos, entonces se podrá discutir la relativa eficacia de convertir una muy buena AA en una bestia parda. Ahora mismo, que te encuentras 1 CV en 10 partidas de tier IX-X y encima te va a evitar mientras tenga objetivos más fáciles simplemente no merece la pena.
-
Futuro Contenido World of Warships // Discusión General
Taliesn replied to Xsilent's topic in Gameplay
Gracias Risalan! He jugado CVs en un par de empujones, no los juego a diario como el resto de clases. Probablemente me decante por el Kaga por aquello del MM y que me han gustado más los IJN. No me veo por ahora con un tier VIII cruzándote con Des Moines, Minotaurs y BBs USA a gogo. -
¿Con quien del foro te has encontrado en batalla?
Taliesn replied to RommelVSTyra's topic in Gameplay
Yo muchas veces ni me fijo en los nombres. De hecho, si no me llegas a saludar en partida ni me entero, así que si no saludo a algún "fellow forumite" no es por antisocial sino porque no presto atención -
Futuro Contenido World of Warships // Discusión General
Taliesn replied to Xsilent's topic in Gameplay
Supongamos que quiero caer en la "twampa" y comprar un CV antes de que desaparezcan. ¿Qué aconsejáis, teniendo en cuenta que estoy en tier VI de ambas líneas? ¿Saipan? ¿Kaga? ¿Merece la pena el Enterprise, por aquello de que a veces un CV de tier VIII es necesario para algunas misiones, o es mejor subir hasta el Shokaku o Lexi? -
Sitting currently on KGV and Duke of York, where EM is needed. On Mino EM is completely unnecessary. Manual AA on Mino (or Hindenburg for that matter) is overkill, you get to see a CV in 1 out of 10 battles, and there is a good chance he will avoid you like the plague (funnily enough, thinking that you are probably heavily AA specced) anyway. Same reason I use hydro on both Hindenburg and Kutuzov. You get to use it more often than DefAA given the lack of carriers in top tiers.