Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


About Taliesn

  • Rank
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

1,025 profile views
  1. Taliesn


    Ok, let me begin with a I'm not very fond of the tin foil hat brigade and the caveat that maybe I have been very lucky in these three years I've played WoWs in getting regular SCs (choosing TYL) but it's been a while since I've seen any. And I don't see people posting theirs. So I'm thinking, has there been a nerf (ninja or not) to the SC drop rate that I'm unaware of? Or... [tinfoil hat on] is this WG being pissed off at the in-game buffs debacle?
  2. Taliesn

    USS Black still worth the steel post CV-rework?

    Long smoke, radar, very good concealment, nice enough guns, top lol torps... Black is still great. Very few (if any) DDs are good against CVs anyway, and on top of that you can expect the number of CVs to diminish once the initial rework fever has passed so it shouldn't be a major consideration. I can't see why would you compare them to a BB and BC, absolutely different playstyle.
  3. Taliesn

    MM with Minotaur and Seattle

    Zao you say? I feel you bro In fairness, it's only 181 battles so ten more victories in those 181 battles would move the WR to a respectable 54% but even so...
  4. Taliesn

    Transaction Error with Camo

    Thanks mate, as it happens I tried the time honoured: And it worked. Go figure.
  5. Taliesn

    Transaction Error with Camo

    Sooo, I know there is probably a section for this but lets face it, everybody checks gameplay. Anyone has had this issue? Somehow my Hindy doesn't have the premium camo on (I didn't disabled or removed it) and I can't load it back. It says Transaction Error. Any ideas why? (Probably some stupid thing I've missed but thanks in advance)
  6. Taliesn

    Yolo mode...

    I'd swap the CVs position. Blue (why not green, or am I colourblind now?) to start top left and Red to start bottom right.
  7. Taliesn

    Problema de ping por las noches?

    Was that some "fina ironía"? The spanish section of the wows forum was shut down on March 2018. Have you tried in Fuego y Acero? http://foros.aceroyfuego.com/topic/1103-problemas-de-ping/
  8. Agreed. She'll have a great time again when the italian cruisers enter the game in like 2029
  9. Taliesn

    I'm absolutely rubbish, or so some say

  10. Taliesn

    Opinions on an accidental friendly torp

    There is no superfluous info on the mini-map. You can bet there is usually a lot more chat spam than actual information in chat. And even a Stop GK (however stupid it may be) can be flooded and hidden behind BBs asking for air cover in a no CV match and the like...
  11. Taliesn

    Opinions on an accidental friendly torp

    Your torps your responsability, I'm afraid. Also, AFAIK Harugumo doesn't come equipped with Shima 20km torps and Kurfursts don't magically appear out of nowhere. i know mine doesn't.
  12. Taliesn

    Oh no Kremlin isnt OP

    Has someone checked in his relay if he had the same angle against the reds when he was blaped? For all we know he was finally turning towards them after the near Devstrike. Anyway, that was fun. Except for the Alaska, mind.
  13. Taliesn

    Naval Training Center - Ideas & suggestions

    I'm gonna shamelessly quote myself:
  14. Next we will be told that the playerbase likes to play multiple ships (one battle each to be precise) instead of a few preferred ones, after looking at the evidence from every second week of September where, only coincidentally, WG gives a SC for every tier X ship you have if you play a battle with them. But it's got nothing to do with that, oh no. WG wants people to play low tiers --------> Sells a tier VII silver ship with a huge boost to move as fast as possible from her and up to Des Moines. Suuuuuure thing. I know a common trope around here is to say the playerbase is pond life and I'm afraid somebody at WG has swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
  15. Taliesn

    Sovetsky Soyuz

    Sweet Mother of God! I never look at stats when playing in Division. Your stats in random solo are poor because, well, surprise surprise, you are not a very good player. Soyuz's camos are no different to the ones you put in any other ship. Wtf mate? Do you actually mean concealment? In which case I've already pointed to you that Soyuz has a good enough concealment compared to all tier IX BBs. Guns are BB guns. Better than most at close ranges, crap at long ranges like most BB guns are. Bismark or any other fully specced secondaries BB might be fun once every ten battles, but more often than not is not an optimal configuration. You are better served with FP for example. So there, a hint on how to play Soyuz. AA is not worse than you average tier 9 BB and I would guess it is actually good. But feel free to post any numbers to back your assertion. Range is good enough. If you are shooting things at 20km+ you are doing something wrong. And your stats would seem to confirm that. Random solo will NEVER improve. It is 24 people with litttle coordination and very different skill levels and motivation. Your PR and WR will improve if you become a better player. No other way around it, as you can't be forever carried by your team. So you don't give a damn about stats? Fine. Don't come here to give crap about ships if you don't know the very basics about them and about what you are doing in game, though. And no, you don't know very well how most of the ships are to be played. That much is clear by, guess what, looking at your stats. Finally, you should be banned for the mongoloids bit.