Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Hugh_Ruka

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    4,054

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5642

  • Clan

    [OGHF2]

Posts posted by Hugh_Ruka

  2. Posted

    To answer your CVs part, back then CVs played differently. There was actual counterplay and such. But there were also other extremes ... And WG in their infinite wisdom fixed the wrong things and we ended with the mess we have today. Actually back then I was considering trying CVs seriously. Did not manage before the rework.

     

    For the rest, I agree and I am a bit guilty of dragging the games down. I must say I have fully embraced the new "straight to new battle" option introduced recently and do not take time off to spectate and learn anymore ... no reason to do so ...

    • Cool 3

  6. Posted

    4 hours ago, ColonelPete said:

    The poster should at least post his opinion.

    Linking to a video is not a good way to express ones opinion.

    Imagine everyone would do that.

    everybody would express their agreement with the contents of the video if they don't state otherwise in the post ... I mean why write a lengthy message when the video says it already ?

    • Cool 2
    • Bad 1

  7. Posted

    CVs in a 6v6 format ? Are you sure ? What happened to the "group up to defend against CVs" ? There will be 2 blobs sailing around the map when CVs are present ?

     

    Also why all Leagues T10 ? I will still troll in a Khaba just for the fun of it but that's about the only outcome. Many people will not take that season seriously or participate with such a setup ...

     

    EDIT: I can already see all the "Improve/Change Ranked" threads just because of this :-)

    • Cool 2

  8. Posted

    I had a few of these but in a different way. Guns green, click not registering at first, next one goes through. Looks like lag tbh so maybe that's just it, but ping ingame shows normal values ...

  9. Posted

    25 minutes ago, Dark_Meta_ said:

    When did "post a random Flame-u video under every devblog for outrage sake" become a thing?

    Can we stop that?

     

    And no posting new topics with a video in it and generic "game is ruined!!11! we must be mad!!1111!!11" are no good either

    well ... have you watched it ? he's mostly harping on all the known problems that are in the game and just pointing out how they apply to the new ships ... I mean he's a bit sensationalist there but still valid points ...

    • Cool 3
    • Bad 1

  10. Posted

    Tier 9 BB with 9.7sesc rudder ... Khabarovsk cries in the corner ... but TBH that ship is beyond saving now. If it gets better rudder, it cannot use it because it needs the LM, so concealment is still horrendous ... It would need a range buff but then the LM needs reworking again ... I've given up on WG doing anything reasonable with that ship ...

    • Cool 1
    • Funny 1

  13. Posted

    9 hours ago, Karasu_Browarszky said:

    There are 15 non-premium Soviet era containers.

     

    image.png.e922ee6ad7e6fdb72fb773b0ae5d107a.png

     

    Here's what they gave in all their (non-premium) Soviet glory!

     

    shot-23.06.15_00.26.35-0717.jpg

     

    Pretty dumb, right? Well, it's a handy way of converting your coal to credits at a disadvantageous rate. A bit like in the Soviet era when buying US dollars with roubles....

    this would actually be decent back in the day when camos had a purpose ...

    • Cool 2

  14. Posted

    No more CVs and CV mechanics until AA is properly working and balanced. Also you do NOT mention any mine countermeasures anywhere ... I hope you HAVE something there other than slow down and try to navigate around them ...

     

    Strategic missions is just the usual mission chains in a different graphical presentation ? If yes, you can scrap it already ... wasted resources ...

    • Cool 3
    • Boring 1

  17. Posted

    Actually he has a point .... a ship with only one type of shell and no torps will have this where exactly ? armament 2 ? and ship with AP/HE/Torps will have this on Armament 4 ? it is highly confusing because the number of weapon types you can have varies from ship to ship and the settings are whole client only ...

    • Cool 2

  20. Posted

    58 minutes ago, Nauseica said:

    Some one call the paramedics in WG balancing department they are definitely sick , japanese and german buffs in the same dev blog !!! (ye i know nothing big deal but hey its something)

     

    I dont understand why soviet dd's concealment get air increase :cap_hmm:

    I think the WG balance department has some other special operation ongoing and these are temporary interns that created these changes ... does not look like the usual bunch ...

    • Funny 3

  22. Posted

    3 hours ago, Sunleader said:

     

    He cant.

     

    Pay Attention to the Details of his Post.

     

    ""Third to Last"" He got 1300 Base Exp and Ranked 4th Place on his Team.  The is no 8 People above him.  Its a Ranked Battle. There was only 6 Players per Team.

    So thats Pretty Normal for 60k Damage and 1 Kill. Especially as he got 0 Capture Points.

    it was only a 8 Minute Battle to begin with.

     

    Also.

    The Submarine Scored a Kill as well. So there is no way the Submarine dealt no Damage.

     

     

     

    He is likely just making a Bait Topic.

    he clearly stated that the sub rammed the enemy sub ...

     

    also since when does absolute damage factor in the XP ? last time I checked it is % of the ship HP you did damage to and he did nice damage to 2 DDS ...

     

    but you do know it all as usual ...

    • Cool 2

  23. Posted

    23 hours ago, 159Hunter said:

    Played an OP today, the battle report seems to be broken:

    - total amount of shells is missing one AP ( a citadel on me ) from the Bayern (see total of PD = 3 but only 2 show up )

    - also missing the forts, but I can't remember if this was always the case?

    counting.jpg.da4b5b21bb38214ee8eedcb95bae4fc4.jpg

    overview shows 18 shells (15 / 3) but the detailed one shows 18 and only 17 when you count the breakdown ... also damage numbers do not add up ...

×