Hugh_Ruka

The problem with the above is, playstyles differ, ship and captain builds differ. What worked for some CC might not work for me. But I have no way to test. It's the same when somebody recommends a movie to you. You may like the same genre but you might dislike that specific movie.

"the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium if the performance has begun with the consumer’s prior express consent and his acknowledgment that he thereby loses his right of withdrawal." I still have an issue with the word performance here. I guess it is an issue of "lost in translation". I have looked at my native language one and German one, both to me have a different meaning of the English version .... whatever. It seems your view is the correct one. Unfortunately EU does use a general term for "digital content", which is not really good. Because under the same definition you can have music, movies, visual art, software etc ... and each of these categories is distinct in the specific sections. The question is, does f.e. the applicable law for music where it clashes with music as "digital content" take precedence or does the "digital content" part take precedence.

I just had a cursory google search for the relevant EU Directive, I have found my native language one: 2019/770. There are no such provisions that are described in the "Cancelling digital downloads" part in that directive. Now it may be outdated (it is from 2019 after all), but digital content and digital services are considered for the 14 day period as well with only exceptions being delivery via public sector and streaming during a performance. Also please note the KEY words at the of what you highlighted: "online digital content", "starting the performance". this is valid for delivery by streaming, i.e a live event that CANNOT be returned by definition. afaik same applies to concerts. once you take part you cannot ask for a refund. only if you did not attend.

breaking news, UK is not longer in the EU ...

not exactly. there is NO special case made for digital media. that means they fall under the same laws as anything else. it is not about the type of good but about the availability of proper testing/try before buy options.

Care to enlighten us HOW ? There are several key aspects of ships you cannot check by just looking at the ship in port. At some point in time there were rental options for premiums considered and the idea never came back. You can simply disable XP/credits generation for rental ships leaving players with expenses (modules, service costs) so the option is not abused ...

V1 would be hilarious enough ...

Afaik the EU DDs have narrow and normal narrow spreads, try using the normal narrow one :-)

You can do that in modern Ranked even better ...

and the distribution of WR vs time played you just pulled out of your behind to back up that claim ?

and what does the timeframe of the stats have to do with date of acquiring the ship ? yes playing longer does not equal better but it generally is the case ...

that's a rather skewed statistics. Missouri was the T9 first premium to be cut from the game. Far earlier than JB and the others. So those having Missouri are the more seasoned people (excluding lottery winners) so it should have better stats.

Operations are the ONLY mode for small clans to play together that don't want to participate in CBs. There is no other game mode that features 3+ divisions.

Can you remember a massive Operations rework that would start WG on the sunk cost fallacy route internally ? I don't ....

Most of us are asking for the return of Operations that ALREADY EXISTED !!! So no new map or even operation design needed.

So I have watched Flambass testing on PTS. I have not tried myself and will not try myself since the rewards for PTS are CTs only. Anyway a few observations: 1. Why does the Snorkel mast raise when the sub is submerging ? Makes no sense since there is no snorkel depth option anyway. And snorkel does not work underwater. 2. The combat underwater is even more boring than watching CVs. And Sub to Sub engagements are boring as hell to watch. Have to watch a few different streamers on PTS, but subs don't look engaging to me at all. EDIT: Watched Flamu, my observations are basically confirmed ....

Well given that players from all over the place reported the issue, it can only be YOUR ISP as that is the only common element here. Or game servers ...

I bet the "new" Missouri will have this line in the shop: If deemed necessary, balance changes may be applied to Missouri ....

So why not introduce a sistership and keep Missouri only to people who owned it ? Ooooh wait, the confusion this causes will actually mean some people will buy the new one by MISTAKE and that's what you are hoping for ? Also will the NEW Missouri be available for FreeXP as the old one ? OH NO IT WON'T !!! time to mothball the game and migrate to something worth the time. the greed on display in recent months crossed the last boundary with this ...

Not intentionally ...

I am saving whatever RB points I have is for signals.

please looks carefully, the title is different, the length is different ... publishing date ?

Oh, so I am not the only one ... started happening last week ...

No, this one:

Just a remark, you have another How it Works video on the channel that is named Essentials, but it is NOT the one in the article ...