Hugh_Ruka

You are proposing teamwork in this game ? You'd have more success trying to remove the 2nd Amendment from the US constitution ...

you've hit the Kleber on his saturated midships part probably

how ... did ... you ... MANAGE that WR ? I could not even if I tried ... amazing ...

Each CV tier has the same problem ... no matter if 6, 8 or 10 .... I had 4 games with CVs in a row where I was just bullied by the CV in a DD (Bronze) and could not do anything but lose HP ... so YMMV ...

yeah, only in it for the commander (for Haida) ...

oh lol, so once the mission is completed you have no way to see how much you contributed ? way to go WG ... somebody thought this one through it seems ....

poor Indianapolis ...

Now imagine WG nerfing the crap out of it come next patch :-))))

Definitely, that's why you have these recurring threads that people were detonated from 100% by one attack :-)

as I said, that depends on which side you look at ... from the sender point of view, one salvo, boom ... 100 to 0 ... from the receiver point of view, technically it is not possible ...

That's the difference between the sender and receiver .... on the sending side, you cannot fire single barrel from a multibarrel turret, so you send 3-4 shells with one click (event on sender side). However on the receiver side, these are counted separately. Each shell on its own. Thus you are detonated by a single event from the sending side while it is multiple events on the receiving side. Then you have nerds like Pete that will always the the most nerdy definition to just dismiss the argument without actually thinking about both sides of it ... An extreme example is a torpedo spread from a non-RN DD that can only send a full launcher of torpedoes ... there can be actually a few seconds between torpedo hits. Those are definitely multiple events on the receiving side while being the same event on the sending side.

Except Khaba is for a few years no longer a DD but a light cruiser without a citadel ...

Oh why don't you suggest just comparing the numbers when the game launched ? Those were the highest in history ... oh wait ... He did include the relevant numbers because they height of popularity in recent years was due to external influence (covid) and not game quality ... now we are back at what game quality gives us ... and it sure does not look that well ... also why would Asia serve be relevant to the main point other than a point of comparison ?

Khabarovsk buff when ?

Yes you do. Otherwise you'd not be posting here ....

I have spent several years playing this game. Now I am no walking encyclopedia but I do understand all of the current ingame mechanics. Can somebody explain to me how the proposed change should work ? Because I am lost ... WG: Can you please describe model situations how you envision this "thing" being useful to the player and how it should work ? thank you ...

except class specific goals (f.e. hits by rockets or aerial torpedoes), I do not see why I should be prevented form competing with other ship classes in the same ? I can citadel in a DD, there are even DDs with secondary guns etc ... it is just artificial restrictions or lazynes to put up 3 class missions with the SAME requirement (f.e. earn X amount of base XP) and just separate that by class qualifiers. I can perfectly complete 80% of those missions in a DD yet I am not allowed to. hard skill criteria are not that bad if restricted to one game mode. we had similar with clan battles, you had to be member of a clan of a certain size to earn steel ... now we have mercs so anybody can do that ... the only badge of honor available in this game is either I have X amount of time to grind or I have Y amount of money I spent ... even Ranked was reduced to a participation trophy grind. and speaking of probois ... when everybody selects only the optimal ship, we end with a CB situation where you meet the same 4-5 ships in the top leagues just because they are optimal and WG have to ban certain ships because they are too optimal ...

well you are the one advocating for some skill based MM or did I misunderstand ? so I'd like to know how that should look like ...

yeah sure ... you could start by defining how you would measure skill from existing stats ... I am genuinely curious ...

you know this is funny ... from all the information on the actual project this is based on, they had some serious trouble fitting the autoloader into quad turrets even on a BB hull ...

well this is a game, not a job ... if you are not having fun feel free to play something else ...

The most time I spend on this game is watching Flamu ... then I start the client, click the daily shipment reward and that's it most of the days. I do play a few ranked games here and there. I have even given up on my goal to get all silver T10 DDs. The gameplay has degraded that much ...

So to get the tokens one has to grind more and more each EA event ... why am I not surprised ... Oh and good job with the global mission thingy ... another FOMO addition to the game. So I cannot play for some reason and the mission gets completed without me, I am out of luck.

Where is the difference ? It's just another type of grind. Also you are aware there are already skill based missions of the type "In 1 battle ..." those are nothing less than skill bars ... so why stop there ?

You cannot have nice things in this game ... company policy ...