Hugh_Ruka

Unfortunately that goes against the principle of the whole line ... The only good ship in that line will be Udaloi now. Grozovoi has bad agility for decent concealment DD. Ognevoi has no gun nor torpedo power. Udaloi with these changes will fall in line with the other T9 DDs in being much better then the next in line. Ognevoi needs main battery RoF boost.

actually it brings Grozo online with other DDs on consumable order so no more consumable mistakes ... I actually like that because I had to look at the consumables when playing Grozo instead of going by muscle memory. The Udaloi change is massive, it will make the ship much more versatile as it can now stealth torp with about 2km window ...

which one do you mean ?

Atlanta needs something and it is not gun reload ... I'd say it needs Legendary DM agility. Also would be nice if the Leningrad got the same turret traverse as the Minsk.

oh no CVs, me looks at Z-39

so basically "Save a star" ?

well ... after a 27% WR evening, I cannot say it is a problem with the MM ...

Any DD where I don't need 3x3 point skills ... or only need 1x4 point skill ... It is fine for a dedicated DD hunter, in any other role it just warns the BB that a DD is near ...

No they won't. Otherwise people might actually test them. Why do you expect WG to want actual testing done ?

Z-39 probably. Or Blyska ... I don't think Leningrad would work well.

And who decided to change the icons ? F.e. Speed boost ?

I think that's the preferred solution ...

Who decided to increase the BLUR of overlays like Modules etc ? It looks really awful and is not controllable at all. Can we get that fixed ? Or point my nose to where the control is that reduces it please ...

Arms race was fun, but a bit too many players ... 9v9 would be better. My goal was to try out Arms race and finish the Grozovoi LU. Got the LU at rank 3, did not play further. I would like some better algorithm for map rotation. Playing 6 times in a row Mountain Range gets boring.

how to properly comment on this one ... something along these lines: AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH ..... NO !!!!

I have realized that and edited my post right after I posted that ... I did not read the line properly :-( I was hoping for a 20% rudder buff

Nope, otherwise Z-52 would be on the list ... However the Khaba mod looks RAD !!! If that makes it into the game, the ship will be pretty strong with it ... EDIT: scratch that Khaba remark ... that's DEBUFF on action time of consumables ... that will be a junk unusable module with that part ....

You are aware this is a game and not a job or competition right ? RIGHT ? Why you heff to be mad ?

gives me "Invalid code" ... EDIT: had to click about 20 times until the code was finally accepted ... bummer

dunno ... took 5 tries in FF to activate the code, gave "Invalid Wargaming code format" error the first 4 times .... never had that issue before, I think it's something on WG side as usual.

depends on if they include the mod into the usual missions/challenges ... if not, nobody will play it .... same as Arms race when it was excluded ...

and after first DD engagement you will lose them anyway ... not worth over the one main gun

Adding fighters to Cleveland, Seattle and Worcester ? Really ? Also allowing DFAA on T5+ US DDs all hulls ... what's the point of the C hulls then for Mahan etc .. ? When will you remove those from game ? Anyway, this looks like across the board USN AA buffs ... if those ships need extra AA protection then that's a direct proof AA is not viable as a defensive measure against planes ...

normally it takes about 2 updates of testing a full line ... we have seen only T6 subs so far ... so I don't think 1-2 months is enough for them ... Yes I know it's WG we are talking about but still ...

and that same 3 squadrons could be wiped out by one DM or Mino or a single fighter squadron in one run. your point being ? you cannot pick and chose only a part of the picture that suits your agenda. you either consider all the variables or shut up. you are complaining about ONE particular T10 DD out of about 12 that is an issue for you. There are 6 CVs (T8/10) that are an issue for every OTHER T8+ DD ... kinda unbalanced don't you think ?