ForlornSailor

Mate, I hate to do it, but I beg to differ... 1 win / 1 loss from evening session is missing. My wows-numbers isnt updating, but avg damage is beyong 80k. And before someone says, I have no idea what im doing with my Cesare or a BB in general, I suggest to check my randoms stats.

Buahahah. you cant write this stuff. I assume he thinks, since he didnt saw you (undetected), you cant see him either. I think, this logic is learnd right about the age of 2 for normal human beeings? Then again - the avarage wows-players doesnt qualify as normal human beeing (had to learn today again) so...

Something is wrong. something is VERY wrong. WG - you hate me? I literally have to kill all enemys to win ranked. I got an avg dmg of ~80k today and 5W 7L. Its INSANITY! This one tops it. Im 1 vs 3 and beeing insulted by my carrier for about 10 mins (well he insulted others too but since I told him so play Co-Op, he was on my butt all the time). He flew all his planes along the border to snipe. I told him to move, since I saw the cruiser is headding for him - he insulted me - then he died - insulted me more.

I hear that. I have so far not a single game without High Calibre, all played in Divi and im at 50% WR. The throws ive seen... I actually once wrote "gg" in chat, just to witness 4 of our ships getting oneshotted in the minute after that - turning a 5vs3 into a 1vs2 (I managed to kill one of them during that "performanceshow").

Put it on a RN CL and see the magic it can do. But yea, I agree with you: it would be better for the game if that "skill" wouldnt exists. There are a couple of those. I personally am against Incoming fire alert...

I hope you know, that this argument of your can be turned complely around on you? And it even makes more sense that way. A BB/CL/DD can litereally have 1 HP left and deal as much or even more damage then a BB/CL/DD withfull HP? In no way are they restricted in their damage capability by taking damage. Unlike the CV. He can literally have full HP but be absolutly useless, when he lost all his planes. He has lost his offensive capabilities. Other ships dont lose them - unless they permanently get a module destoryed. You talk as if any ship other then a CV, that gets hit ONCE is send to port right away. Thats not the reality.

As someone, who was argueing in favor of matching radars 1-to-1, I have to say: this is a very good point that I havent thought of.

a) it was said by many other people then me b) what is that, what you write then? godgiven facts? tz The cruiser is your direct counter.Stop whining when he does what he is supposed to do - killing you aha. yea.

Nope. Didnt quote like that, liar. Didnt use any bold to put an emphasis, which you obviously needed to do to distract from your defensiv reaction. But yea I get it "uuh its a thread against DDs! Must defend, whine & flame, cuz its MUH DDs!" If you´d even understand that his has nothing to do with DDs in the first place, that would be great, k?

A) Im from Finland B) The Washington Capitals are my favourite team from the NHL That should answer the question already on Top of that, Ovechkin is my favourite hockey player so

No... if you´d read, what I quoted, you´d see, it was an argument against "restricting people's choice of how and what they can play." And FYI @Captain_KriegWurst in low/mid tiers, there are 2 CVs per side allowed. Yet still you cant division up with another CV.

Ive seen you play DD. All I gotta say is: The way you played, its no wonder you think "small mistake" means death. Smoking up in the cap, waiting and just eating torps... Is that your huge experiance? Maybe get the basics right before you call others inexperianced.

Can I play a CV with my buddy picking a CV aswell?

I generally like to role my head over my keyboard as I generally just like to hear the sound of my keys clicking without worrying too much.

Exactly. This has been mentioned quite often. Sidenote: WG said, current CV is "disconnected from gameplay" What is the rework then? I play completly alone. Absolutly. I dont need to care about enemy fighters, I dont need to watch, where I can stack DoT with my team since I do this all by myself. I see a lot of talk how bad the current CVs are @Pikkozoikum but you dont care to adress any of the problems of the new gameplay? Maybe you havent identified them yet?

You know whats the real funny thing? We literally have a test-server. They could have used that environment to gather people and let them test, what they have proposed in the forums over the years. Yet they didnt even concider that. But they let randoms in GZs reach havoc on the gameplay in randoms. And, ofc, they can do a testing NOW. To me, it feels like just another slap in the face. Sure, CV/RTS Gameplay isnt appealing to everyone. No argument there. And tbh, the way CVs were designed in the first place - it wasnt suppose to be the go-to-class. CVs actually are/were meant to be 1 out of 12 (2 out of 12 for lower tiers). So I feel, when WG is argueing about the popularity, they are not beeing honest. They just wanted to add some more arguments to their case, make a bigger list. Its also funny, that now they actually say in the videos "oh, there is a skill gap between CV players and that creates problems". Never before have they acknowleged anything like that. With ships like Saipan they even made it worse, giving better players even more tools to dominate less decent players.

Do we? Not sure if I wasnt clear enough: I and others are beeing ignored while reporting this bug. simply ignored! I have been giving constructive critisism for 2 years. Ive typed my fingers bloody in my spare time over and over again (as have others) with the only reason, to make this game better. Sure, some things are my personaly view and It would be delusional to demand, everything I write needs to be implemented. Im far from beeing that thick. Yet, other things, that I and other have said are so painfully obvious bad decisions, that yes, they needed to change. Saipan - AP bombs - T4/5 manual attack removal, just to mention those three. So how to support someone, that doesnt listen? like at all? I reached the point, were I think, this forum is a waste of time. And yes, saying the CV-Rework is bad and pointing exactly out what it wrong with it, is constructive critism. Its more constructive then saying "RTS is bad mkay!"

Read the thread, it has been explained in detail many times why that is bad. Bad for DDs. Radar has cooldown.

Read the guy above you. CVs arent unpupolar by default. There is a reason for that. And its easy to fix. But WG effed it over the years. Now, if you are REALLY interested in seeing the whole picture, you go back 1 year... 2 years in the history of forumites like @El2aZeR @ghostbuster_ @Commander_Cornflakes or even myself and you will find them preaching, how CVs are heading the wrong way, WGs ideas/changes are bad for the gameplay, that it will kill CVs for new players, what instead should be done to balance CVs and make them more attractive.... and so on. This is not a new topic.

Lets take a look sideways at the whole pictore for a moment, shall we? They´d actually have a lot of other things on the table, much more urgent. Which they dont attent to. - Port UI. Affect everyone in the game. Gotten even worse lately (check current thread, im affected myself) - There is a bug in Cherry Blossom OP, you can not get 5 stars anymore. Ever. Ive reported it over 20 days ago - its actually in the game longer, I heard from other Operation players. They dont care. AT ALL. - QoL-improvements. Lots of things have been asked. Make it easier to attach/dettach signals f.e. A buttom, that lets you dettach all signals on all ships. "Its not our priorty" is the standard answer for, I wanna say years. These are actually things, that annoy people so hard, they wont play the game. Back to CVs: Lets face it. Its rather that CVs are beeing removed and replaced by a new class, that only shares the same name. Appart from the CV-rework, which obviously impacts CVs completly - it changes the entire game. - The role of ships change. - AA has to change - it actually IS changing, as we see from the mechanics. - Balance of ships between each other changes - ships, that have been build around AA strenght are in a different role now (Hightier RN CLs f.e.). - The way DCP impacts you changes - What are you going to do, when you get a flooding from the first TBs? and he is still over you? DCP? rather not. It is by far the biggest change ever introduced into the game. And there is a huge potential to screw it up. You can do as much testing as you want, on testserver, people dont behave the same as on live server. Also, huge part of the playerbase doesnt care / know about testserver. No matter how good the rewokr will be (objective/subjective - doesnt matter) Im expecting a sh!tstorm soon after it goes live. And the point wont be, if people complain for a reason, but rather: do you change the game so much after such a huge time? Same goes for subs pretty much. This is all besides the point, if you actually like the current or the new CV-gameplay more. Its about how people in general react to huge changes.

So how do you know this? You dont. im pretty sure. Or are you going to tell me, that the engine doesnt support chat and port aswell? Cuz its bugged forever and getting worse. Maybe we should rework the entire game then? About the other two quotes: Did you stop reading my answers after the first 5 words or are you deliberatly quoting out of context? Because I mentioned the things, that you are using to counter me, and told you, why that is and why its getting worse. If you want to discuss, then dont try to be a smartboy, k?

Has to do what exactly with RTS? Other RTS games are perfectly fine. WGs fault, not RTS. Totaly your personal, biased view. YOU dont like RTS, we get it. RTS players like it. Again, nothing wrong with RTS. Also doesnt impact the game. I will NOT go into detail, why CV-Player numbers are low. @ghostbuster_ mentioned a lot of thing, the forums are filled with why that is over the years. Yes, its a balancing issue. People suggested range, change of spotting mechanics and what not. Again, read up the gazillions of threads, were people made suggestions about that. Nothing to do with RTS. Ofc you can balance that. And has nothing to do with RTS. Take 2 DDs and cross torp a BB - same effect. Are DDs now RTS? Besides: Now dropping the same target over 4 times and laugh while he is flooding is better how....? Skill gap has exactly what to do with RTS...? And: Yay. now both CVs get to farm the enemys for free. 20 sec in the game you have your first squad in the cap, raining down on the stupid DD, that moved ahead to play for the objective. Much fun! The radar-thread is FULL of people saying "I wont cap anymore, cuz there are radar cruisers behind every island". IF this rework is going to be somewhat popular, we WILL see threads "im not going to cap anymore, since the CV rapes me right away. btw, nice litte sideeffect: the DD will be permaspotted, while the CV is circeling him over and over.

This literally does not make sense. Everything, that was/is wrong with CVs has nothing to do with RTS itself. Its a matter of balancing.

You do actually PLAY this game, right? I fully support everything you said. Especially for some cruisers, there exist hilarious spawns. Ever spawnd in the center of Hotspot with Donskoi or Moskva? Looking from another angle - those are actually also good reasons to implement the suggestions from @BrusilovX.

Agree. And since 3 DDs in Divi is usualy super bad for your team (because they are, as already noted, usualy potatos), I´d say limit number of DDs per Division to 2. Still not optimal but better then nothing.