ForlornSailor

READ - AGAIN ! You - completly - missed the point of the post !!!!!

I always know where the BBs are, they dont need to be spotted to make upmy mind, where I position myself. Also: we are talking about a couple of hundred meters, which will translate into SECONDS (!) you are making it sound,as if Im going to win half a minute or something. That whole example you build there is so constructed - it would play out exactly the same right now. Ok. we raise concelament of cruisers, so thats a buff. Now Ive seen it all here in the forums.

Read again....

I had it also, that the shells landed way too short, like at 2/3 of the distance, that they actually should have travelled. Got a screen with Mino around somewhere... gotta search. There I was shooting almostmax range and the shells landed in no mans land at ~12 km or something?

How are they suppose to suffer? Which is the class, that has the smallest problems if spotted? Right. BBs. What should punish them harder? The Cruisers? Which are also spotted easier and actually suffer through this? DDs? How should a DD punish a BB harder, when the difference is: spotted at 14 or 15 km. It makes zero difference.

Donskoi even has the best Torps of the entire line :)

Yea you wish. Right now flamuu did a cross drop on the test server with the new Midway. Against a DD. 2 hits. Then he came back with drop No.3 and gave the DD a perma flood.

I dont know how related that is - but did any of you ever had salvos, which went to completly wrong places? like all shells just fly many kilometers away from where you actually aimed them at? This happens to me occasionaly on ships with fast reload and usualy when I switch the target. Had it today with Jervis. Those 2, that Ive marked, are actually mine, aimed for the bow of the Tirpitz.

Because - Kron cant bow tank, which Stalin can. - Stalin has one of the worst concealments, so it will always be spotted, while Kron has workable concealment to use open waters. - And they arent similar ships.

Dude you were on flamuus stream these days. Yea, I agree - your personal skill IS missing in your Winrate. Just not in the way you think... What you did in your Conqueror was more then laughable.

Have you ever concidered ruining your stats on purpose? Then you´ll get WGs attention and can make them build a decent game for all of us. Come on, be our Martyr, we will forever praise your name if you make this happen! Sorry, im out of any reasonable ideas at this point, so must resolve to religious lunacy.

I mean you are citing the only shipclass, that has a limit in CB, to form that argument for a Cruiser. Hm. Why dont you want to limit the number of, lets say, Zaos? And what about Harugumos? Worcesters? Let me just tell you this: Its much harder to deal with 7 Harugumos then with 7 Stalingrads. You have just been trolled by good players. Do you think, you chances of winning would have been better, if they´d had a different setup? Seriously? And If you think, thats what they do all the time, I can tell you from first hand: its not their normal setup (in case we really talk about 5D).

Well, some people need to be put in their place. He thinks he can run around in this thread, attacking everyone that has a different view then his and insult them - and then he doesnt like the taste of his own soup? Its absurd. Actually, he even attacks one guy, that just informed him about the offical position of WG and calls him an "radar abuser". This guy needs to learn some manners and how to discussion. And if it needs to be done by pushing him into a mirror - then so be it.

Wow, over 5,8 mil pot. dmg indeed is impressive. Although I have to tell you - you dont qualify for the group I described. With your 61% WR account you are simply too good.

*edited

Thats the power (or problem, matter of perspective) of statistics. There are diferent way of looking at them, different way to interprete them. And without context, they conclusion can often be falsified or flat out wrong. With statistics you can prove almost anything (has been done even by well-educated people). You could prolly prove, that drinking water turns people into mass-murderers. About this specific thing: NBTR telling, his captain was bad and that we was inexperianced at that time, is one of those facts, that are not shown by the naked numbers. We all have ships like that in our stats. Well. Some dont - they reroll becuase they obviously cant take it. Some people picking on the weakest link in the stats (like one guy does here again), are just morons tbfh. They have understood little themself. Yea especially for those people the forum has the ignore-function. Its useless to argue with them, since they are incapable of having a discussion in the first place. As I said above: they will look for anything in your stats, that fit their agenda and build their fake-castle around it, to make your position look invalid. For those people, we probably would have to have 10.000 games played in each and every ship in this game (they would find the 1 ship missing and pick on that) with all very high super-unicum stats - but then they´d pull the "no-life" card, so whats the point in talking to them? Let them think, they know better how you play and whats your abilities and how they have changed over time. Isnt it hillarious, that they think, they can judge this better, while they dont know you and have most likely never even see you play? Thats what it all boils down to and its really makes me laugh, thinking about it this way.

*edited

What a load of bull. However, I can safely assume from your response, that you have no idea how to play against radar and use it to your advantage. I take the current radar over LoS-Radar ANY day. While Playing a DD. Now whats your answer to that? And why is this thread gathering so much attention? Focusing on one aspect of the russian-radar, completly ignoring the rest. I have a comparision with the same level: FFS DAT CRUISER HAS 8 SEC RELOAD - MA BB NEEDS 30 SEC !! DAT NOT FAIR - CHANGE NAO. How can anyone make such a one-dimensional post and also think, he has a point?

Yep, thats a perfect way to spend dubloons atm. Cant get better then that. @Giorgio_marksman I´d suggest to buy something - if you dont go for the port slots - max. T7. Also, you should in general stay at that level for now. You arent ready for T8+, thats obvious from your stats. Example is your Nagato - Izumo - Yamato. You are ok in Nagato, you obviously skipped Amagi with Free XP - which is a shame, since its a decent ship - and then manage the same avarage damage on Izumo as you have with Nagato. And only 20k more with Yamato.

I know what you are trying to say here, but to be fair: Looking at the best players and compare the stats that way doesnt really tell you much. Let me explain. There is sort of a "maximum" damage you can achieve in avarage. You see a lot of the best players beeing in this same range, the same, that we see on the screenshot. It simply isnt possible - on avarage - to get much higher. So given that a player can pull out the maximum out of one ship (which those players can, we agree on that I guess), they will get into this range. The same goes for Winrate pretty much. Certain factors will push you in some ranges +/- a few Percent. Solo-->Division-->Division with CV (given the division players are the same skill) = rising Winrate. You say it yourself: what will be much more interesting, is this: Which we should soon see? I cant wait for the first 50% randoms players to get their hands on Stalin. Im serious. It will actually tell us a lot. We just have to hold our horses a little bit longer.

Yup. Go there and upload that replay, Id love to see that @BarthalomewKuma

Yup. Can confirm, its reworked and in rotation.

I would also like to know, who at WG came up with that .

Cossack in Dynamo is.... I have no problem to division with the best of the best and compete with them about kills. But there simply is no competition against a Cossack... My greatest gaming achievment is already 2 days old. Not that great result by numbers, but with my smoke-teamplay & spotting I enabled @DFens_666 in his Fiji to have a great round. And thats what DDs are all about, so im happy On top of that, it was the game that pushed me over this line: