DFens_666

I see he went full BBaby again in the 2nd game *pushes into several enemies* "BBs are fragile, wont take FP because i want something else, which ofc means, BBs should get everything because why not Would be interesting to know, how many fires came from the Georgia secondaries, you know, ANOTHER BATTLESHIP Oh, ontopic: I have Missouri, Musashi, Pommern and Georgia. Why do i need it?

What i dont get is, how do these people can keep on spewing their lies after such an event? Instead of saving even a little bit of dignity, they double down on more nonsense... Guess thats what the internet does, because IRL, someone would have smacked them in the head at some point

Do you remember that thread from a while back, where they asked which ships should receive a buff in our opinion? I dont think i have to say more...

*clubbing intensifies* At that whole saving potato stuff above: If you try to save a potato, you may succeed in that. And the result is, he will just stumble into the next situation which gets him killed. I stopped that long ago. You cant even get in there and make it a 2vs1, because they will screw you over and run off when the enemy sees you and then you are alone. And is your health thats going down, not his. So potatoes are essentially doing what they should NOT do: use others as meatshields. Thats the problem when people like Flamu say "using their teammates as meatshields" which makes ofc sense, because you dont want to lose the best player on your team. However, DK being very strong with our playerbase, they all think they are the best players themselves. I havent watched the video, but one remark for this: If the stronger side screws up on its own, then helping them would most likely not matter either. If they are more, and they still fail, then it means they were useless to begin with, and most likely a default loss from the get go.

2 Games - twice not getting a Kraken Overall, 3 Marblehead games, 5 DDs killed In the first one, they were all horny for our CV. Gnevny first, then Nicholas and even the Trento didnt see his teammates dying, so he though "well, lets see what happens when i go there".. yeah didnt turn out too well for him 2nd game was like "oh crap, im here at the island and 2 Kongos + Emerald + Huanghe are coming my way" Emerald came around the corner *Blap* there he went, the remaining enemies lost their head-lemming and started turning away while @Saltface popped me a smoke so they dont blapp me in return

One very important thing is prioritizing the right targets aswell: Here is one more DD ive hit, but didnt fit on the screen Those are the ones you want to kill first. Because DDs win games. BBs give damage but they are rather unimportant targets, especially early on in the game. Hitting a BB for 5k or 10k wont hurt him - he will just heal half of that back and it wont effect him at all. If you can land a good hit - sure, you can try that if there is no other target available, but its better to hit a DD for a few k or get a cit on a Cruiser than shattering/bouncing on a BB.

Because 60% players are pretty rare, i think its less than 1% of the playerbase. So statistically you might get one on your team every 8 games or so (maybe even less). (because half the time we can end up on the enemy team too, so 8 games are almost 200 players)

https://wows-numbers.com/de/player/569972785,Wolf_Harms/ Well, thats not entirely accurate... you currently have 46% WR (almost 47%) and last week its 47,6%. So definetely not 3 wins out of 10, its closer to 5 out of 10. And with 47% you are basicly right around the median WR of wows players. A bit more than half of the players have a better WR than you. (~48% is the median). Not every game ofc, as i wrote earlier, you lose 3 out of 10 by default. Only a handful of people can get more than 70% Solo WR, and almost everyone of those is playing CVs, because CVs have a higher match influence. Also you cant look at one evening seperately and say "oh well but i lost 9 in a row" or something like that, because that can happen. But over a larger sample size, only your skill matters. Some people can win up to 80% in 7v7s, so its possible. Ofc not everyone can do this, as we are all different and not everyone can be a top notch player even if they would try. No. Should i show you what teammates i have? heck, i posted a screenshot above, check my teammates, one of them had 41% WR...

Also So most people would have lost this game, because getting 5 kills and rushing 2 DDs down to kill needs skill. A lot of people would have probably just suicided or died in a crossfire, because they dont know better. Is that also rigged MM, because some people would have lost? And i didnt because i played smart and got the win when it was 3vs5 ships? Surely that guy is one of the "winning" players, who know how everything about this game... you think, our teammates are not 40% players? Yes they are.

Thats not being accepted into winner teams... its becoming a better player, so that YOU can win the game. 3/10 games you lose no matter what 3/10 gams you win no matter what 4/10 games YOU decide if you win or lose. But well, as the others already said, waste of time apparently...

I bet you would only find like 10 people playing wows who would say, that T4 CVs are balanced... and all of them are Hosho mains

New player retention must be horrble, but maybe they dont care, when 1 out of 10 spends like 2000 bucks in his first months playing the game and then buggers off because spending any amount will not make him a better player. WG has the numbers, so i guess they are fine with it?

Did you miss the whole "CVs are not balanced, because if we balance CVs, then we lose players, and low player numbers mean CV rework is failure and then people will lose their jobs because bosses dont like wasting money on shitty reworks"? Lowtier CVs are keeping player numbers healthy, thus CV rework remains a success! Most played CVs by individual players (last 28days)... good luck with more nerfs for T4 CVs Ofc i whole-heartedly agree with you, but this motion is futile. WG will do diddly-squat.

I always wonder what these people do, when they get their asses handed to them by a 2 tiers lower ship? I guess thats when the cheat accusations come out, because otherwise brain goes poof

Thats already the case, since (usually) both teams have the same amount of CV/BB/DD/Cruiser and both teams have the same tier ships aswell. There is no inherit imbalance between teams, by giving one team a CV and the other not f.e. Your proposal means, there is no need to become a better player. If both teams have an equal chance to win by default, then skill essentially becomes useless. Why should i thrive to become better, if that means that the enemies also have a better player? If i play bad = 50% WR. If i play good = 50% WR. One requires effort on my part, the other not. That would be if 2 people have the same job, and one guy works 8h and the other 4h and both get the same wage. Id just take the 4h job, because why put in more effort for zero gain? A system where someone who is better gets better result is as fair as it can be. If you improve yourself, you win more. Here i dont see the connection. Sure your team will have a slightly worse chance of winning because you already take up on spot. But thats only true as long as you are a below average player. If you try to get better, then your team has a better chance of winning. If you want to become better, make a new thread and ask for help. Upload some replays, so others can watch them and give you pointers. Here are enough people around who are willing to help you, if you want to become a better player. Its your choice.

So he will get better teammates when he "finishes" his 200 games in protected MM? The only way to teach people anything in protected MM, would be to actually put smarter bots in there. Bots in protected MM literally dont even hit you, and often they start staring contests with other bots and you can do a drive-by or yolo torp them with your DD. No wonder DD players suck after exiting protected MM, when all they did down there is torp everything to dust from 1km. Suddenly, human opposition doesnt just yolo into you and deal 0 damage while you can just farm them. It teaches bad habits - nothing more.

Randoms Permaranked CBs Brawls Special modes How much crap do we need? Couldnt care less tbh... rewards are not worth the crap going on in that mode. Is it the same as last time? Like make division during battle and then torp your div mate, cancel the div and [edited]him 1 sec before the torps hit for ultra mega kek? Or trying to invite someone to div, he cancels, then he attempts to kill you because he is captain beachcommander, but ofc he sucks so you pull down his pants and play with his dingeling, so he tries to invite you into div so you dont kill him? crap gamemode, crap rewards, crap players = best to avoid.

If you want to have a chance to get rare ships from XMas containers, the best bet is to buy any other ship you can get before that. Because once you have all the other crap out of the way, you can get ships like Enty, Benham, Musashi...

Maybe the T7 Commonwelth Monarch which was just announced...

Im playing the Manly-mans build I was thinking to swap out the secondary range mod for the dispersion mod in slot 3, because the dispersion is just so YIKES at times...

Seeing this, i doubt WG will buff Flint (last 28 days stats). Players / Battles played / WR / XP / Damage / Avg kills So WR is basicly same, less XP (i assume less damage on DDs), more damage, and same avg kills. Survivability is also the same (25,6-26,3%, Flint has the highest) Spreadshit verdict: Balanzekov!

I wanted to also play secondary Pommern, but in the end you are so dependant on your DDs not screwing up So i played Benham and won 9 out 10 instead...

The last time they nerfed Hindenburg it got stronger

T61 T61 T61 In that order I really wouldnt buy any T7 ship because MM stinks. T6 MM stinks aswell, but not so much. T61 can cope with that. And buying a CV?