DFens_666

Played a couple of Dynamos today, got like ~140k FreeXP First with Cossack, man this thing is OP in that operation, atleast against the Schnellboote. First 4 salvos were all onehit kills

Last game i played with GK ~10 days ago i had the bestest dispersion ever guess not hitting is just BB stuff

Vacation? All the kiddies are running wild ruining the game Id only go in with 3x div which can carry almost any game - so it doesnt matter if your teammates are drooling all over their keyboard. Better yet, if they are slightly worse than the enemies, more to farm for you!

Page up / page down should do the trick (faster and slower ofc)

But other people probably like wows the way it is now, not being a simulation? I think the game itself is great, there is just other factors draging it down

BB/DD main by any chance since you seem to have problems with Radar and smoke? How about we add this stuff aswell, so you know, everyone gets their fair share of "simulation" - CVs will be totaly OP - BBs basicly dont hit anything, and they will be reduced to max 1 per battle (which is still too much ) - DDs get only 1 torp reload - Radar will be constantly on AND longer range than now also remove hitpoints because obvious reason. You cant just cherry pick some stuff which will make wows closer to reallife/simulation.

wows is not real life They can program the game however they see fit. Smoke works as described - whether you like it or not was not subject of the question.

Because as a coop main you know bot CVs tend to be better than human CVs most of the time? Real answer: you wish WG already admitted that CVs wont be balanced because they can only test so much on the PTS.

You talking about our divisions?

KGV is an HE spammer ship, so natually many players will rack up damage like nobody's business. I myself have a rather low average damage in it, because i shoot AP so often (im really not good spamming HE just dont get the fires i need, or someone else gets them, which is good for the game, but doesnt show on my PR) PR comes mostly from damage and kills, and after that from WR. Since you have a better WR in KGV compared to your other ships with a reasonable (could be more) amount of games, i say you have more influence on the game than with the other ships. PR is more of an ego-boost id say. I have won 8 out of 9 games with KGV aswell, yet my avg damage in it is below the top 50% of EU server, i dont care tho. I blast DDs with HE, and use AP on other targets. If you deal a good AP salvo on an enemy he will always die faster than burning him down with fires. Even more so if you start burning a BB, he retreats and heals himself back up again - its meaningles damage farming. If i go by avg damage on my T7 BBs, then yes, KGV is the lowest right now (Nelson > Nagato > Gneisenau > KGV - Colorado and DOY can be ignored) But if i win, i dont mind.

/s (because necessary)

Do you have another account aswell? Kinda hard to tell with only 5 battles played with DDs But the way i see it: BBs are "easy to play" yet kinda hard to really play well. You can see that with PR on wowsnumbers. Even high WR, high avg damage and good avg kills tends to be low unicum rating at best. You have to perform MUCH better in BBs to get a super unicum rating compared to Cruisers/DDs. (92k damage 0 kills is ~3000 PR with Cleveland, while 174k + 3 kills is only 3600 with Musashi - both wins) Having an impact on the game with a BB usually comes down to positioning and using your HP pool at the right time - not necessarily by dealing damage. You can farm damage from the back yet make your team lose by playing like that. BB is area denial - close to a cap, majority of the ships wont dare to push you, as they simply cant kill you fast enough, or you can kill them faster.

I see it the way, that not everyone can/should necessarily be good in every ship in the game (sure the best players will pull it off tho, and then there are still CVs being RTS not enjoyable for everyone). But there should be SOME ship somewhere which is enjoyable for everyone who is atleast willing to think when he is playing.

Lets for a moment forget that he basicly sucks in the mino, but How can he have fun playing the Mino? - He dies every game - He doesnt kill anything basicly - He doesnt even deal any damage (5k average can be considered doing nothing) I simply cant understand that. It would be so frustrating for me to die every game, doing literally nothing.

Have you looked at your own stats in a while? - Massa B has the best overall stats from your T8 ships (best damage, kills, basicly tied for WR with Cossack) - You havent played a single T8 Cruiser - Lightning is your worst T8 ship - which is a DD. - Monarch is a bad BB (so i heard atleast) You should really play some T8 cruisers and see how much fun it is getting raped by higher tier - CVs - basicly every BB - Pretty much every Cruiser aswell - Some DDs can dakka you to death with ease. Whats that supposed to mean? That they can win a 1vs1? Some Cruisers can do that to T9 and T10 BBs aswell... since BBs have pretty much the same armor and mostly the same guns, it doesnt really matter if its T8 or T10 T8 BBs can Citadel T10 BBs aswell - deals massive damage also

Its funny now that i got to play CBs for the first time, i feel it increased my skill level again. Basicly did the same sh*t with the shchors as i do with Hindi -> Slow down / speed up / wiggle all the time - they could barely hit me 9k damage received with 800k potential, and thats all HE except one AP salvo from Haguro (yes all BBs peppered HE at me aswell )

QE is great, i like it Dunno how you play it, but use AP. HE is crap, but because of the big caliber, AP can be very devastating + its very accurate imo. Citadelling cruisers is easy because of the sAP, and BBs you tend to get a lot of pens aswell regardless of angle (unless you face T8 ofc) Its probably more likely that he would be a bot tho... Im not saying, disabled people dont play, but i think more bots are in this game rather than disabled people. And there was one person on this forums not too long ago, who managed decent stats despite being disabled. At the same time ive seen streamers who basicly had slightly better stats than the OP showed - so everything is possible.

Business as usual Imo shchors is just OP af (4 min and i got my arsonist )

The problem is, we already have BBs as Cruiser killers. At the same time, the lineup is "unnatural", having more BBs as Cruisers probably most of the time. Or equal amount of both atleast. I also see a problem with the MM. When BCs have to be matched also, they will basicly be matched against the same ship everytime, as we simply dont have that many BCs to begin with. Either it might increase queue time for those who play BCs, or you would need to swap a BC either with a BB or with a Cruiser (most likely the latter) so you have the same match as we have now - no difference.

Well... your first sentence in this thread was to tell the OP to get out of this forum Even when you used the same post to give your opinion, you still kept derailing this thread with you bashing the OP for his bad english. But here you go: Yes, i agree with the OP, those players should not be playing Randoms.*edited*Basicly they are not even playing the game! Ive seen people turning their turrets left and right probably looking at islands, while they had targets to shoot at... I have no problem if they do that in coop, but in randoms you should try to do the best you can. And not shooting in a "shooter" is simply not an option. You said, everyone has the right to play this game - fair enough. Thats why they can play Coop. They are ruining other peoples TIME ! and fun by playing like crap.

You simply cant compare english to any other language. Even when English is not the native language of the majority of the people here, its still the most common language used between different nationalities. If i have to deal with foreigners at my work, im not trying to speak my or their language with them - usually english works best. So you cant blame anyone for going to the english forum EVEN if he would have his own section available (which he even hasnt in this case) Thats for the mods to decide

I thought about making a thread once on why T6 ships are worse vs T8 than T8 vs T10... couldnt be bothered tho. (same could be said about T7 vs T9 tho)

So in the last week you played Alabama twice and moan about it because you lost both? Alabama doesnt even need to grind through T8 since its a Premium. After looking at your stats: I cant understand why you complain actually Also in regards of your T8 vs T9 BB stats: T9 seems to be doing worse

how about no? Armor is basicly the same going from T8 to T10 so you can bowtank with ease. Unless you see Yamato or Musashi but they can overmatch a Montana aswell. Yet, T8 BBs tend to be (much) smaller and more nimble compared to their T10 breathren. Cruiser on the other hand basicly dont have any armor to bounce BB shells. But the T10 Cruiser actually can do it (atleast better), and their firepower is much higher. T8 vs T10 BB is pretty straight forward, reload isnt much different and you can bounce shells. T10 Cruiser just rip through T8 Cruisers. DDs have much less health, but stealth is not so much an issue, as it tends to be fairly good on T8. If i could choose on what NOT to play in a T10 game: - CV is the worst - then Cruiser (atleast most of em) - BB/DD depending on what ship exactly we talk about, but i prefer BB in T10 compared to Cruiser any day.

Uhm... Literally no difference there. - Both have 406mm guns, only Montana has 33% more firepower compared to Alabama. - All plating on both ships is enough to bounce each others shells (bowtanking works both ways). - Montana has advantage in a better protected citadel afaik... dont have alabama so dont know how the citadel looks on her, but Montana Citadel got lowered sometime earlier. - Montana has slightly better armor penetration with its AP - not that it really should matter.